358:
as vague, possibly subjective and not a significant category: "popularly associated" is a very vague claim, "sexy" is vague, and playing a sexy role however defined doesn't really put you in a discrete category that is analysed in depth by multiple writers. Would you allow
261:
If we can't come up with a reason for something to be included in the encyclopedia, then it shouldn't be included. But ignoring that for a moment, can you give me a formal, encyclopedic definition of "sexy" that isn't POV or OR, and
174:
242:. Since the subject is actresses, it's hard to believe that reliable sources can't be found that refer to them or the roles they played as "sexy", so I'm not sure the original research argument holds here either. ~
168:
417:
127:
100:
95:
397:
104:
364:
87:
134:
288:. I agree with your point; all I'm saying is there are plenty of sources with lists of "top sexiest actresses of 2012" or whatever, that could be used to support
238:. I have to admit I can't see a good reason to delete this or keep this. I have to ask: What policy or guideline is being violated here? It's in compliance with
270:
the people included in that list? Or even better, a potential formal title for the list, assuming there was a reason for keeping it in the first place.
189:
293:
156:
368:
17:
532:
495:
475:
429:
409:
388:
348:
332:
307:
279:
253:
226:
69:
150:
213:
or whatever, unfortunately there is no clear CSD criteria for it or I would use that. This list serves no purpose. It should be
491:
467:
379:
be notable with sufficient media coverage, but this article is too far from any encyclopedic topic to rename, merge, or fix. --
146:
91:
196:
551:
508:
360:
83:
75:
40:
372:
162:
384:
504:
547:
525:
471:
284:
Formal encyclopedic definition and relevant related articles are right there at the disambiguation page
36:
488:
463:
182:
320:
380:
343:
302:
273:
248:
220:
425:
405:
328:
64:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
546:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
239:
214:
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
520:
449:
445:
206:
453:
365:
list of
Philippine actresses a majority of schoolboys would like to have intercourse with
210:
485:
458:
441:
338:
297:
243:
507:
this but (as Cola suggested above) how is it any different to creating the article
421:
401:
324:
58:
121:
205:
This was PRODed but there is no reason it should exist until Nov 25. Call it
512:
375:
may well be notable, and even competitions/polls for the sexiest actress
371:? Knowledge (XXG) is not a site for movie trivia lists. Topics such as
511:? It's POV social-media-type stuff which is entirely appropriate for
540:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
285:
516:
294:
List of
Filipina actresses judged 'sexy' by popular press
117:
113:
109:
181:
418:
list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions
195:
369:list of Philippine actresses who've played nurses
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
554:). No further edits should be made to this page.
398:list of Philippines-related deletion discussions
337:Heh. I didn't know about that essay. Thanks. ~
452:and this list will be primarily populated by
8:
440:per my PROD statement: "No demonstration of
416:Note: This debate has been included in the
396:Note: This debate has been included in the
415:
395:
292:entries on this list. A title change like
296:would be better. Or maybe a category. ~
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
509:List of ugly Philippine actresses
361:list of tall Philippine actresses
84:List of sexy Philippine actresses
76:List of sexy Philippine actresses
450:a publisher of original thought
373:sexuality in Philippines cinema
483:per nom and above. Obviously.
1:
533:01:39, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
496:00:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
476:00:27, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
430:00:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
410:00:23, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
389:00:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
349:23:35, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
333:22:31, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
319:- while some users feel that
308:23:35, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
280:21:34, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
254:21:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
227:21:11, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
70:02:47, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
446:general notability guideline
266:a potential BLP concern for
571:
448:. Knowledge (XXG) is not
543:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
321:all hotties are notable
323:, I rather disagree.
503:- I'm not trying to
519:, but not for WP.
432:
412:
347:
306:
252:
562:
545:
529:
494:
341:
300:
278:
276:
246:
225:
223:
200:
199:
185:
137:
125:
107:
48:The result was
34:
570:
569:
565:
564:
563:
561:
560:
559:
558:
552:deletion review
541:
527:
484:
274:
271:
221:
218:
142:
133:
98:
82:
79:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
568:
566:
557:
556:
536:
535:
498:
478:
434:
433:
413:
392:
391:
353:
352:
351:
314:
313:
312:
311:
310:
203:
202:
139:
78:
73:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
567:
555:
553:
549:
544:
538:
537:
534:
531:
530:
524:
523:
518:
514:
510:
506:
505:WP:OTHERSTUFF
502:
499:
497:
493:
490:
487:
482:
479:
477:
473:
469:
465:
461:
460:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
436:
435:
431:
427:
423:
419:
414:
411:
407:
403:
399:
394:
393:
390:
386:
382:
381:Colapeninsula
378:
374:
370:
366:
362:
357:
354:
350:
345:
340:
336:
335:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
309:
304:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
282:
281:
277:
275:FreeRangeFrog
269:
265:
260:
257:
256:
255:
250:
245:
241:
237:
235:
231:
230:
229:
228:
224:
222:FreeRangeFrog
216:
212:
208:
198:
194:
191:
188:
184:
180:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
148:
145:
144:Find sources:
140:
136:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
77:
74:
72:
71:
67:
66:
61:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
542:
539:
526:
521:
500:
480:
457:
437:
376:
355:
316:
289:
267:
263:
258:
233:
232:
204:
192:
186:
178:
171:
165:
159:
153:
143:
130:
63:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
481:Snow delete
169:free images
442:notability
548:talk page
513:The Chive
459:Callanecc
422:• Gene93k
402:• Gene93k
37:talk page
550:or in a
522:Stalwart
468:contribs
444:per the
339:Amatulić
298:Amatulić
244:Amatulić
128:View log
39:or in a
325:Bearian
259:Comment
240:WP:LIST
234:Comment
215:snow'ed
175:WP refs
163:scholar
101:protect
96:history
59:postdlf
54:WP:SNOW
501:Delete
438:Delete
356:Delete
317:Delete
236:Delete
207:WP:POV
147:Google
105:delete
50:DELETE
377:might
264:isn't
211:WP:OR
190:JSTOR
151:books
135:Stats
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
472:logs
464:talk
426:talk
406:talk
385:talk
344:talk
329:talk
303:talk
290:some
286:sexy
249:talk
183:FENS
157:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
65:talk
528:111
517:FHM
515:or
492:ley
489:and
486:TBr
456:."
367:or
363:or
268:all
209:or
197:TWL
126:– (
474:)
470:•
466:•
454:OR
428:)
420:.
408:)
400:.
387:)
331:)
217:.
177:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
68:)
56:.
52:,
462:(
424:(
404:(
383:(
346:)
342:(
327:(
305:)
301:(
272:§
251:)
247:(
219:§
201:)
193:·
187:·
179:·
172:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
149:(
141:(
138:)
131:·
124:)
86:(
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.