723:
grown rather slenderer. Finally he states that it is possible that someone might be interested in this information. We delete articles every day that people are interested in, because they don't meet policies or guidelines. That somethign is interesting is not automatic grounds for its inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG). Uncle G's arguments are weak, they do not address the objections to this list raised in the nomination, and opinions
262:
and it's far more interesting than many other articles here that most people would never dream of deleting. There's no major reason to get rid of this, and the fact that it survived two votes already makes it seem like certain people are just pulling the we're going to vote until I get the answer I
722:
is not a compelling argument. Each article must pass policies and guidelines on its own regardless of the existence of any other article. Even if one were to ignore that flaw in his argument, since the last AFD of this article a number of those lists have been deleted, so that particular reed has
295:
from "keep" to "no consensus." Six months passed between the second and the third. Hardly the mark of an organized effort to nominate and renominate until the desired result is achieved, and suggesting that the nominator is engaged in that sort of conduct strikes me as something of a failure to
135:
475:
I don't see what's 'indiscrimate' about this list, it has very clear criteria for inclusion. As Gene Poole says, this list is going to be useful to some hard pressed radio producer - or Bob Dylan in theme time radio hour. Saying that it's incomplete is an argument for adding songs to it, not
713:
but his cited guideline states that the creator (and by extension, the defenders) of a list must be prepared to explain why the list contributes to the state of human knowledge. I don't see any such explanation in any of the AFDs of this article. He goes on to cite a slew of
447:, per Uncle G's comments in past discussions. Most of the arguments I'm seeing for deletion are too vague or flimsy to convince me otherwise. Terms like "indiscriminate" and "unencyclopedic" need some fleshing out before we can have a real discussion here.
131:
489:
The fact that
Knowledge (XXG) is not paper does not mean that every article gets a free pass. Regardless of the storage medium of the information on Knowledge (XXG), any individual article still has to meet the appropriate policies and guidelines.
88:
83:
92:
680:
Just because it's true (and sourced) doesn't mean that it should be included in
Knowledge (XXG). Even if the article itself is not indiscriminate (i.e. it has clear inclusion criteria), that doesn't mean that
75:
785:
and see how that develops. In the meantime, these songs are still a loosely-associated list of things with nothing in common but the presence of some digits in the title. A list can follow the list
851:, with many songs appearing in both lists. Are both really required? Or could they be merged into a single article, thus removing one "pointless" list but still keeping the basic information? (
855:
831:
810:
797:
768:
731:
701:
689:
672:
651:
635:
627:, I must confess that the comments from Uncle G which seem to be cliching it for so many people seem to be eluding me. His arguments in both previous debates are pretty weak.--
619:
607:
595:
575:
558:
542:
510:
494:
480:
467:
451:
439:
413:
400:
387:
375:
363:
341:
323:
304:
279:
267:
250:
230:
212:
200:
175:
158:
57:
715:
115:
663:
554:, but I think that if we have articles about songs with names, songs with places, and songs under one minute, we might as well have this one, too.
122:
Lists can certainly be quite useful, but this is taking it a bit too far. We don’t need a list of everything that can possibly be listed. Delete as
806:
The problem is that the main policies in question (not indiscriminate, not a directory...) are perhaps the vaguest policies on
Knowledge (XXG).
710:
782:
275:
I don't like it when people keep trying again and again to get an article deleted because they don't like it. Plus I agree with Dream Guy
227:
79:
463:
would I find this information if I had a need for it? ...and as a radio programme director I can think of plenty of reasons why I might. --
147:
320:
71:
63:
747:
have something in common: they lead people to call the numbers, a fact that has been noted and even used as a form of marketing. See
17:
196:
587:. As noted above, the criterion for inclusion is crystal-clear, and self-verifying. Third AFD, and sometimes consensus does
317:
781:, does not have a phone number in its title) and speculates about a third. If you think that is notable, feel free to write
719:
568:
551:
349:. My first thought when I saw this was "wow, we certainly have everything here... but what is it for??" Unencyclopedic.
895:
36:
848:
748:
171:. The songs have nothing in common beyond happening to have a phone number in the name and are otherwise unrelated.
259:
224:
894:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
824:
152:
881:
145:
123:
130:. As far as I can tell from the links, 3 real pages link here. This has been through AfD twice; it was
760:
372:
221:
192:
820:
789:
by being well-defined in inclusion criteria and still be unsuitable for
Knowledge (XXG) if it fails
852:
616:
436:
724:
875:
870:
603:
per the wise arguments made by Uncle G in previous debates, common sense has not changed since.
519:
777:
The linked article cites two songs which have inspired crank calls (one of which, Alicia Keys'
615:. Fairly indiscriminate reason for grouping these songs together, and can never be complete. -
686:
669:
477:
276:
53:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
397:
865:
740:
682:
644:
297:
292:
168:
127:
755:
633:
604:
464:
351:
248:
184:
331:
239:
864:
Believe it's been said but this is just a directory of loosely associated things which
698:
648:
507:
426:
384:
828:
807:
794:
728:
572:
491:
448:
410:
301:
264:
172:
555:
335:
209:
49:
109:
592:
629:
316:- a list of indiscriminate, unencyclopedic information if ever there was one.
244:
291:- over a year went by between the first AFD and the second during which time
739:
As Uncle G pointed out, this list is well-defined and unlikely to attract
685:
doesn't apply. In my opinion this article is not of any encyclopedic use.
888:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
709:- his argument in the last AFD is quite uncompelling. He cites
169:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory of loosely-associated topics
476:
deleting the whole article. Knowledge (XXG) isn't paper.
783:
List of songs which have inspired prank telephone calls
105:
101:
97:
220:
per RockMFR, by which I mean per Uncle G elsewhere.
697:- This is worthy of a category but not an article.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
383:some lists are useful. This isn't one of those.
72:List of songs whose title includes a phone number
64:List of songs whose title includes a phone number
898:). No further edits should be made to this page.
550:, I know we aren't supposed to use our basis as
409:There is no way this would stand as a category.
208:per Uncle G's comments in the previous afd. ---
435:per nom. Time for Ricky to lose that number....
8:
716:lists about presidents of the United States
868:. Can't believe this survived AfD twice.
571:is not a reason for keeping this article.
506:per Uncle G's comments in previous AFDs.
662:: This debate has been included in the
567:Good to know that you understand that
258:- I'm pretty much a deletionist, but
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
751:, particularly the last paragraph.
847:This article is rather similar to
645:indiscriminate list of information
183:, it's an indiscriminate list. --
24:
743:. Furthermore, the songs listed
371:for the same reason as Otto4711.
136:got no consensus in November 2006
394:Delete, but turn into a category
707:Comment to those citing Uncle G
664:list of Lists-related deletions
849:List of songs about telephones
1:
518:, trivia, not encyclopedic.
260:Knowledge (XXG) is not paper
238:, idiosyncratic list with a
915:
825:you don't like the policy
425:Thanks a lot, now I have
891:Please do not modify it.
856:14:16, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
832:04:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
811:00:46, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
798:21:32, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
769:21:25, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
732:19:36, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
702:18:03, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
690:10:15, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
673:09:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
652:22:49, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
636:18:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
620:17:45, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
608:17:44, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
596:16:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
576:18:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
559:15:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
543:13:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
511:05:56, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
495:18:05, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
481:04:38, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
468:03:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
452:03:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
440:02:18, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
414:00:54, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
401:15:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
388:10:41, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
376:09:56, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
364:09:45, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
342:09:04, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
324:08:59, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
305:13:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
280:22:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
268:08:51, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
251:07:24, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
231:05:08, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
213:04:34, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
201:01:24, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
176:01:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
159:01:12, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
58:01:39, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
866:Knowledge (XXG) is not
727:should be discounted.
718:to justify this list.
293:consensus was modified
711:a guideline for lists
695:Delete but Categorise
683:WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE
242:underlying concept.--
128:WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE
821:you like the article
819:Or it could be that
132:Kept in October 2005
720:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
569:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
552:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
632:
247:
741:original research
667:
628:
298:assume good faith
243:
906:
893:
880:
878:
873:
767:
763:
758:
658:
539:
537:
535:
533:
531:
360:
357:
354:
188:
187:Dennis The Tiger
150:
143:
113:
95:
34:
914:
913:
909:
908:
907:
905:
904:
903:
902:
896:deletion review
889:
876:
871:
869:
761:
756:
752:
725:relying on them
593:Smerdis of Tlön
529:
527:
525:
523:
521:
358:
355:
352:
186:
155:
148:
139:
86:
70:
67:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
912:
910:
901:
900:
884:
883:
859:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
814:
813:
801:
800:
772:
771:
734:
704:
692:
675:
655:
654:
638:
622:
610:
598:
581:
580:
579:
578:
562:
561:
545:
513:
500:
499:
498:
497:
484:
483:
470:
454:
442:
437:Carlossuarez46
430:
419:
418:
417:
416:
404:
403:
396:. As per nom.
391:
378:
366:
344:
326:
310:
309:
308:
307:
283:
282:
270:
253:
233:
215:
203:
178:
153:
141:BlastOButter42
120:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
911:
899:
897:
892:
886:
885:
882:
879:
874:
867:
863:
860:
857:
854:
850:
846:
843:
842:
833:
830:
826:
822:
818:
817:
816:
815:
812:
809:
805:
804:
803:
802:
799:
796:
792:
788:
784:
780:
776:
775:
774:
773:
770:
766:
765:
764:
759:
750:
746:
742:
738:
735:
733:
730:
726:
721:
717:
712:
708:
705:
703:
700:
696:
693:
691:
688:
684:
679:
676:
674:
671:
665:
661:
657:
656:
653:
650:
646:
642:
639:
637:
634:
631:
626:
623:
621:
618:
614:
611:
609:
606:
602:
599:
597:
594:
590:
586:
583:
582:
577:
574:
570:
566:
565:
564:
563:
560:
557:
553:
549:
546:
544:
541:
540:
517:
514:
512:
509:
505:
502:
501:
496:
493:
488:
487:
486:
485:
482:
479:
474:
471:
469:
466:
462:
458:
455:
453:
450:
446:
443:
441:
438:
434:
431:
428:
424:
421:
420:
415:
412:
408:
407:
406:
405:
402:
399:
395:
392:
389:
386:
382:
379:
377:
374:
370:
367:
365:
362:
361:
348:
345:
343:
340:
339:
338:
333:
330:
327:
325:
322:
319:
315:
312:
311:
306:
303:
299:
294:
290:
287:
286:
285:
284:
281:
278:
274:
271:
269:
266:
261:
257:
254:
252:
249:
246:
241:
237:
234:
232:
229:
226:
223:
219:
216:
214:
211:
207:
204:
202:
198:
194:
190:
189:
182:
179:
177:
174:
170:
166:
163:
162:
161:
160:
157:
156:
151:
146:
142:
137:
133:
129:
125:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
890:
887:
861:
844:
790:
786:
778:
754:
753:
749:this article
744:
736:
706:
694:
687:Pax:Vobiscum
677:
670:Pax:Vobiscum
659:
640:
624:
612:
600:
588:
584:
547:
520:
515:
503:
478:Nick mallory
472:
460:
456:
444:
432:
422:
393:
380:
368:
350:
346:
336:
334:
328:
313:
288:
277:Theophilus75
272:
263:want thing.
255:
235:
217:
205:
185:
180:
164:
144:
140:
121:
45:
43:
31:
28:
429:in my head.
398:Dalejenkins
240:non-notable
787:guidelines
605:Burntsauce
591:change. -
465:Gene_poole
373:Punkmorten
872:Goodnight
699:A1octopus
649:Acalamari
508:JavaTenor
427:that song
385:Lankiveil
332:listcruft
318:Fut.Perf.
124:Listcruft
853:Mabuzzer
829:Otto4711
808:Zagalejo
795:Otto4711
729:Otto4711
573:Otto4711
492:Otto4711
459:. Where
449:Zagalejo
411:Otto4711
302:Otto4711
265:DreamGuy
173:Otto4711
126:and per
116:View log
762:ithemis
625:Comment
556:Useight
423:Comment
337:Hut 8.5
289:Comment
225:megalon
210:RockMFR
89:protect
84:history
50:Krimpet
862:Delete
845:Merge?
791:policy
678:Delete
643:as an
641:Delete
613:Delete
516:Delete
433:Delete
381:Delete
369:Delete
347:Delete
329:Delete
314:Delete
236:Delete
181:Delete
165:Delete
93:delete
46:delete
779:Diary
737:Keep.
630:Nydas
522:: -->
245:Nydas
197:stuff
154:Speak
138:. --
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
877:mush
823:and
757:—Cel
660:Note
617:fchd
601:Keep
585:Keep
548:Keep
538:<
504:Keep
473:Keep
461:else
457:Keep
445:Keep
356:tleG
273:Keep
256:Keep
228:2000
222:Maxa
218:Keep
206:Keep
195:and
193:Rawr
149:Hear
134:and
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
668:--
666:.
589:not
359:irl
353:Cat
114:– (
827:.
793:.
745:do
647:.
300:.
199:)
167:-
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
858:)
536:t
534:n
532:a
530:i
528:d
526:a
524:R
390:.
321:☼
191:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.