387:, while it's a very informative list for those, who never been to London, but want to know more about its culture and life. It only needs further expand and short descriptions for its entries (e.g., what locations and people have been mentioned). –
158:
271:
It doesn't seem to me to be indiscriminate. "List of songs which include words which contain none of the letters from 'catfish'" would be indiscriminate. This seems to be thematic and not unreasonable given
152:
119:
92:
87:
96:
444:
421:
206:
Not every song on the list has an article. We can put the articles on the list into a category, but we would have to write ones for the remaining songs. –
79:
234:
There's no need to discount a song as not notable just because it doesn't have its own article. Nobody had the time to write about them, that's all. –
246:
If the songs are notable, shouldn't they at least have a source supporting their inclusion in the list? Virtually none of these items have a source. -
396:
Keep - I used this list of songs to help plan a music session celebrating St George's Day at a centre for adults with learning difficulties.
468:
173:
403:
346:
140:
290:
83:
17:
324:- Inclusion criteria seems obvious, not an infinite list, not an obscure subject, a decent source of in-links, nicely done.
134:
476:
459:
436:
411:
391:
379:
354:
333:
316:
299:
255:
241:
229:
213:
200:
61:
238:
210:
130:
218:
If they aren't notable for articles, why should they be on this list? That's the very definition of "indiscriminate".
75:
67:
180:
491:
36:
490:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
472:
407:
350:
235:
207:
189:
A pretty indiscriminate list, one that will never be finished and really should be a category, not a list.
312:
388:
284:
146:
399:
166:
273:
341:- the issues are cleanup (of entries where neither the song nor the artist has an article) and
455:
432:
375:
329:
308:
251:
56:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
279:
363:
219:
190:
451:
428:
368:
325:
247:
50:
113:
342:
345:, but the inclusion criterion is clear and, as mentioned, not unreasonable.--
362:
Clearly defined inclusion criteria for the list. Nominator should read
484:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
366:
to see that a category doesn't replace a list, and vice-versa.
109:
105:
101:
165:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
494:). No further edits should be made to this page.
179:
8:
443:Note: This debate has been included in the
420:Note: This debate has been included in the
445:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
442:
422:list of Music-related deletion discussions
419:
307:Seems like a good enough list for WP.
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
224:Dhéanamh ar rolla bairille!
195:Dhéanamh ar rolla bairille!
511:
477:19:51, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
460:13:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
437:13:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
412:09:50, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
392:08:58, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
380:18:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
355:17:38, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
334:16:19, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
317:15:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
300:12:45, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
256:15:06, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
242:11:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
230:10:48, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
214:10:46, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
201:10:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
76:List of songs about London
68:List of songs about London
62:04:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC)
487:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
462:
448:
439:
425:
402:comment added by
225:
196:
502:
489:
449:
426:
414:
389:George Serdechny
371:
298:
295:
294:
287:
282:
227:
223:
198:
194:
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
44:The result was
34:
510:
509:
505:
504:
503:
501:
500:
499:
498:
492:deletion review
485:
397:
369:
292:
291:
285:
280:
277:
220:
191:
126:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
508:
506:
497:
496:
480:
479:
469:24.136.102.226
464:
463:
440:
416:
415:
394:
382:
357:
336:
319:
302:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
507:
495:
493:
488:
482:
481:
478:
474:
470:
466:
465:
461:
457:
453:
446:
441:
438:
434:
430:
423:
418:
417:
413:
409:
405:
404:86.135.68.215
401:
395:
393:
390:
386:
383:
381:
377:
373:
372:
365:
361:
358:
356:
352:
348:
347:70.80.234.163
344:
343:verifiability
340:
337:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
318:
314:
310:
306:
303:
301:
296:
288:
283:
275:
270:
267:
266:
257:
253:
249:
245:
244:
243:
240:
237:
233:
232:
231:
228:
226:
217:
216:
215:
212:
209:
205:
204:
203:
202:
199:
197:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
58:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
486:
483:
384:
367:
359:
338:
321:
309:Jaque Hammer
304:
268:
236:BuickCentury
221:
208:BuickCentury
192:
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
55:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
398:—Preceding
293:prorogation
274:WP:LISTPURP
153:free images
452:• Gene93k
429:• Gene93k
339:Weak keep
269:Weak keep
400:unsigned
281:Treasury
120:View log
467:Keep.
370:Lugnuts
326:Carrite
248:MrFizyx
159:WP refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
51:postdlf
364:WP:CLN
239:Driver
211:Driver
131:Google
97:delete
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
473:talk
456:talk
433:talk
408:talk
385:Keep
376:talk
360:Keep
351:talk
330:talk
322:Keep
313:talk
305:Keep
252:talk
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
57:talk
46:KEEP
450:--
427:--
286:Tag
181:TWL
118:– (
48:.
475:)
458:)
447:.
435:)
424:.
410:)
378:)
353:)
332:)
315:)
297:─╢
278:╟─
276:.
254:)
222:狐
193:狐
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
471:(
454:(
431:(
406:(
374:(
349:(
328:(
311:(
289:►
250:(
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.