98:
93:
102:
85:
214:
Just because you can't concieve of a use now doesn't mean it isn't useful to someone else, imagine if someone was doing research on the attitudes of hi-tech companies to disabled people, this article might prove highly useful, perhaps all it really needs is to be expanded beyond the scope of a mere
595:, if I may comment. I more or less have a point (or points) similar to those above, and feel that this wiki is unwarranted; besides, the title may be a tad too long, and with such "software projects", such as "
809:
793:
776:
764:
752:
740:
709:
696:
682:
658:
645:
608:
587:
564:
548:
533:
521:
506:
486:
474:
458:
435:
408:
399:
374:
356:
344:
328:
316:
304:
261:
252:
219:
209:
176:
156:
622:
It's not a big jump and not even original research (if A=B, and B=C, is it's not OR to say that A=C, where A, B, and C, are "offensive", "spastic", and "software project", as its simple deduction and not
718:
802:
132:
Lists can be very useful on
Knowledge (XXG), but I think this is taking it a bit too far. We don’t need a list of everything that can possibly be listed, and I think this would fall under
654:
OR to imply that because the word "gimp" is offensive when applied to disabled persons, the acronym "GIMP" applied to a software project is offensive as well. So, delete per OR. --
125:
620:. Of the two sources provided in the article which I could access, both mentioned terms like "spastic" as being offensive, but did not specifically tie it to "software projects".
89:
365:
81:
73:
466:
as blatant POV and possibly actionable by the companies cited. If these were names of people being listed instead of software, it would have been speedy deleted per
443:
Original research and the list's title also indicates a blatant POV. No reliable sources referenced to indicate that people with disabilities find these
599:", what makes it "offensive to many people with disabilities"? Prior knowledge, yes, I suppose. Again, this is subjective, and 'unencyclopaedic'. -
388:
293:
241:
198:
145:
64:
650:
Just to clarify my comment above: A strict logical deduction of the nature presented above (A=B, B=C, ergo A=C) is not OR. However, it
428:
626:
17:
379:
Is "listcruft" a category? Because i think it probably should be. I bet there are quite a few articles that would qualify. --
772:
just cos I find it fkn hilarious, as a biffy!!! (oops, am I allowed to call myself a biffy or have I just offended myself?!)
542:
824:
36:
431:
228:
limit. A list of how tall the buildings on your street are might be useful also, but does that mean we should include
556:
I am a keen defender of lists and AFD articles that might have a future, but there has to be a limit. POV &
823:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
60:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
499:
393:
298:
246:
203:
150:
136:, though it doesn’t fall under any of the specific categories. No pages link there, and I doubt any would. --
604:
425:
52:
386:
291:
239:
196:
143:
719:
List of wireless web-access standards whose name is a term offensive to many persons of
Italian ancestry
518:
803:
List of software projects whose name is a term offensive to a small number of people with disabilities
189:
says, "That something is 100% true does not mean it is suitable for inclusion in
Knowledge (XXG)." --
405:
258:
216:
173:
693:
583:
the claims made, such as that these software products are offensive to people with disabilities. --
56:
676:
600:
454:
421:
482:
although the idea has merit, it is not encyclopedic in nature and is really an opinion piece. --
655:
642:
584:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
666:
366:
List of software projects whose name is not a term offensive to many people with disabilities
515:
372:
786:
779:(ps not an entirely serious comment, although I really am a biffy and it is fkn hilarious!)
699:
Every word can have an offensive meaning, given that there are 6000 languages on our planet
636:
557:
467:
337:
186:
166:
133:
577:
573:
82:
List of software projects whose name is a term offensive to many people with disabilities
74:
List of software projects whose name is a term offensive to many people with disabilities
722:
503:
278:
580:
806:
749:
671:
530:
471:
449:
313:
717:
Kill it now before we have a rash of similar lists about what's offensive to whom.
257:
I am Jack's sense of total and utter indifference, You're probably right anyway. --
790:
561:
325:
119:
761:
706:
545:
483:
369:
341:
353:
773:
596:
447:
to be offensive, much less "many", and probably no such sources exist. --
817:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
529:
blatant POV article, indiscriminate, unsourced and unprovable.
420:
Not doing my usual citation of policy, this is just silly. -
282:
115:
111:
107:
404:
ROFL, go create it, it would a most ironic event! --
277:
I've just noticed that this was prodded on Jan 27 by
181:
Yes, but that doesn't mean we should make a list for
324:the "lame" list. I think it was created as a joke.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
627:Political correctness in relation to disabilities
827:). No further edits should be made to this page.
789:indiscriminate information. Not encyclopedic.
352:- not encyclopedic content, even remotely. --
312:completely unencyclopedic original research.
8:
631:Otherwise, the scope of the article is just
170:Knowledge (XXG) is not a paper encyclopedia
629:article, then maybe merge it to that.
494:. The criterion for inclusion in this
165:You're forgetting the first heading in
502:would be highly difficult to find. —
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
185:. Who would ever need this list? As
172:, WP needs more lists, not less! --
24:
368:? (please, nobody create that)?
281:but an anonymous IP removed it (
224:Perhaps, but there's got to be
48:18:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
1:
810:17:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
794:17:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
777:16:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
765:16:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
753:15:21, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
741:15:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
710:14:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
697:11:52, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
683:10:35, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
659:07:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
646:07:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
609:07:30, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
588:07:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
565:06:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
549:06:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
534:06:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
522:05:28, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
507:05:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
487:04:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
475:04:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
459:03:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
436:03:08, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
409:02:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
400:02:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
375:02:19, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
357:02:18, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
345:02:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
329:01:56, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
317:01:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
305:01:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
262:02:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
253:02:24, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
220:01:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
210:01:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
177:01:32, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
157:01:22, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
670:, with emphasis on the "D".
364:as listcruft. What's next,
844:
820:Please do not modify it.
543:WP:HOLYCRAPWHATWEREYOUON
32:Please do not modify it.
760:. Wow. Just ... wow.
748:- for obvious reasons.
705:Gimp the lame crips. --
232:in Knowledge (XXG)? --
187:WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE
134:WP:NOT#INDISCRIMINATE
498:is too subjective;
801:in order to avoid
46:DELETE. OBVIOUSLY.
679:
434:
69:
55:comment added by
835:
822:
738:
735:
732:
729:
690:
677:
424:
391:
384:
296:
289:
244:
237:
201:
194:
148:
141:
123:
105:
68:
49:
34:
843:
842:
838:
837:
836:
834:
833:
832:
831:
825:deletion review
818:
736:
733:
730:
727:
688:
406:Librarianofages
396:
389:
380:
301:
294:
285:
259:Librarianofages
249:
242:
233:
217:Librarianofages
206:
199:
190:
174:Librarianofages
153:
146:
137:
96:
80:
77:
50:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
841:
839:
830:
829:
813:
812:
796:
780:
767:
755:
746:Pile-on delete
743:
723:Andrew Lenahan
712:
700:
685:
663:
662:
661:
625:If there is a
611:
590:
567:
551:
536:
524:
509:
489:
477:
461:
438:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
394:
382:BlastOButter42
359:
347:
331:
319:
307:
299:
287:BlastOButter42
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
247:
235:BlastOButter42
204:
192:BlastOButter42
151:
139:BlastOButter42
130:
129:
76:
71:
57:A Man In Black
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
840:
828:
826:
821:
815:
814:
811:
808:
804:
800:
797:
795:
792:
788:
784:
781:
778:
775:
771:
768:
766:
763:
759:
756:
754:
751:
747:
744:
742:
739:
724:
720:
716:
713:
711:
708:
704:
701:
698:
695:
692:
686:
684:
681:
680:
673:
669:
668:
664:
660:
657:
653:
649:
648:
647:
644:
640:
638:
634:
628:
624:
619:
615:
614:Holy #*(&
612:
610:
606:
602:
598:
594:
591:
589:
586:
582:
579:
575:
571:
568:
566:
563:
559:
555:
552:
550:
547:
544:
540:
537:
535:
532:
528:
525:
523:
520:
517:
513:
510:
508:
505:
501:
497:
493:
490:
488:
485:
481:
478:
476:
473:
469:
465:
462:
460:
456:
452:
451:
446:
445:program names
442:
439:
437:
433:
430:
427:
423:
422:ElbridgeGerry
419:
416:
410:
407:
403:
402:
401:
398:
397:
392:
387:
383:
378:
377:
376:
373:
371:
367:
363:
360:
358:
355:
351:
348:
346:
343:
339:
335:
332:
330:
327:
323:
320:
318:
315:
311:
308:
306:
303:
302:
297:
292:
288:
283:
280:
276:
273:
263:
260:
256:
255:
254:
251:
250:
245:
240:
236:
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:
218:
213:
212:
211:
208:
207:
202:
197:
193:
188:
184:
180:
179:
178:
175:
171:
168:
164:
161:
160:
159:
158:
155:
154:
149:
144:
140:
135:
127:
121:
117:
113:
109:
104:
100:
95:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
75:
72:
70:
66:
62:
58:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
819:
816:
798:
782:
769:
757:
745:
726:
714:
702:
687:
675:
665:
656:Black Falcon
651:
643:Black Falcon
632:
630:
621:
617:
616:... I mean,
613:
592:
585:Shirahadasha
569:
553:
538:
526:
511:
495:
491:
479:
463:
448:
444:
440:
417:
385:
381:
361:
349:
333:
321:
309:
290:
286:
274:
238:
234:
229:
225:
195:
191:
182:
169:
162:
142:
138:
131:
51:— Preceding
45:
43:
31:
28:
516:John Reaves
514:Listcruft.
215:list... --
721:, anyone?
623:research).
183:everything
694:Al-Bargit
581:verifying
504:Carolfrog
279:Subwayguy
807:dcandeto
750:Moreschi
672:Grutness
635:narrow (
597:The GIMP
531:Resolute
472:23skidoo
314:Nardman1
126:View log
65:contribs
53:unsigned
791:A Train
667:WP:DAFT
593:Deleted
578:sources
562:AntiVan
500:sources
326:Croxley
275:Comment
99:protect
94:history
799:Delete
787:WP:NOT
783:Delete
762:Arkyan
758:Delete
715:Delete
707:Golbez
703:Delete
691:Delete
689:Speedy
637:WP:NOT
618:delete
601:Qwerty
570:Delete
558:WP:NOT
554:Delete
546:JuJube
539:Delete
527:Delete
519:(talk)
512:Delete
492:Delete
484:Xnuala
480:Delete
468:WP:BLP
464:Delete
441:Delete
418:Delete
370:Veinor
362:Delete
350:Delete
342:Djma12
338:WP:NOT
334:Delete
322:Delete
310:Delete
284:). --
167:WP:NOT
103:delete
576:. No
574:WP:OR
450:Farix
432:block
395:Speak
354:Haemo
300:Speak
248:Speak
205:Speak
152:Speak
120:views
112:watch
108:links
16:<
774:Jcuk
770:Keep
678:wha?
605:talk
572:per
541:per
496:list
455:Talk
390:Hear
336:per
295:Hear
243:Hear
230:that
226:some
200:Hear
163:Keep
147:Hear
116:logs
90:talk
86:edit
61:talk
805:.
734:bli
674:...
641:--
633:too
124:– (
785:.
737:nd
731:ar
728:St
725:-
652:is
639:).
607:)
560:.
470:.
457:)
340:.
118:|
114:|
110:|
106:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
67:)
63:•
603:(
453:(
429:c
426:t
128:)
122:)
84:(
59:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.