Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/List of streets and roads in Hong Kong - Knowledge

Source 📝

689:- Knowledge is not a directory or a bunch of mismatched information. This list only promotes the creation of small street stubs (which deserve to be deleted too) which will probably never get beyond being a stub. If I made an article List of streets in New Zealand, it would be deleted & all its articles deleted too. Other than the main streets, all should go (perhaps rename the article to List of main streets in Hong Kong). Overall delete, but if someone can suggest a better idea, please do so... 677:-- It could be argued that most lists on Knowledge amount to directory entries; if it were only notable streets, it could be from a directory of notable streets in Hong Kong. There are loads of such lists, a lot of big cities have them for streets, subway stations, skyscrapers, etc, and valid arguments have been made for their usefulness. Until there's a more general discussion on whether all of these do or don't belong on Knowledge, I don't think targeting one city is appropriate. 123:. Knowledge is not a directory and should not serve as an index of roads in Hong Kong. Not all roads and streets in Hong Kong are notable. While some roads are notable, the listing of all roads and streets in Hong Kong will spur the eventual growth of non-notable roads. This existence of such a list is hard to maintain. This article can better fulfill its intended goal through the use of a category and merging the remaining useful content into 477:. I can't imagine any vote to keep here. This isn't a list of significant or notable roads in HK, it's a list of ALL of them. That's the dictionary definition of a street directory. I'm also unimpressed at the assertions that this article "could" become useful or that it is a temporary holding page for the HK Wikiproject. This article was created 273:
with goals such as splitting information into multiple pages to unclutter and provide navigation resources. Without referencing the aims and methods of the project, we shouldn't judge an isolated piece of it. There are several other articles which could also be judged harshly, in isolation from one
619:
I believe several people simply don't like 'lists', and so want to vote delete here. As I've said above, I think that properly used lists and categories can serve as navigation aids and therefore are useful. (And usefulness is a valid consideration, otherwise you would want to swear off things like
607:
What is the difference in the implementation of the Hong Kong-related set, apparently patterned much like previous projects, that upsets people? I suppose some didn't realize that at 6.8M people the Hong Kong population is certainly of the same magnitude as New York City at 8.1M people. And I
649:, which will include all the streets and roads notable enough to warrant separate articles. There are a small number of tunnels under the Thames, or bridges in NYC, and the history of them as a general topic is therefore notable--and books have been written bout just such topics. 413:
So 1. Are there more than 140 roads on the list? If yes, just delete some items, but not the whole list, and rename the list into "List of notable streets and roads in Hong Kong". 2. Are there more than 140 articles about roads in Hong Kong?
518:
mentions as 'bad' to say in arguments, but to avoid some parochialism simply because it is Hong Kong, please compare to New York City. In that area there are a web of interlinked articles and categories - here are 'some' of them:
331:, one of the purposes of a list is to be useful for development, and this list can clearly be expandable and also to show which articles do not exist, as well as whether they should be. It is not unmaintable. This is not a 663:
I agree that a category would be a better solution. Then all lists that are noteable enough to have their own article would be included, and debates on inclusion and deletion could more easily be handled separately.
85: 80: 89: 72: 548: 432:
rule, that'd be a maximum of 137. Counting just the roads I come up with 242 entries minus 90 redlinks, 152. Pretty close if you throw out the entries without articles.
165: 142: 112: 287: 631:
to suggest for this information? Remembering of course that that same suggestion could (should?) be applied to New York City and every other project like this.
497:
per nom and RGTraynor. Like RGTraynor, I am confused to see any votes for keep here at all. Some have argued above about the useufulness of this article, but
588: 624:
and other shortcuts). Please do not single out one article because you dislike the idea of lists. Would converting to a more category heavy mix be better?
282: 76: 481:
ago, and before a flurry in March there'd been few substantive edits for half a year. Plainly the HK Wikiproject isn't as invested in it as all of that.
552: 528: 600: 68: 60: 309:
a valid use of lists in Knowledge. Please consider this is much larger than the issue of one article. More background evaluation is needed.
693: 681: 668: 655: 635: 596: 532: 505: 489: 465: 453: 436: 419: 408: 392: 380: 360: 343: 313: 251: 235: 217: 200: 188: 184:
Turn this into a coherent article, not just a scattershot list. This stuff could potentially be merged into some existing article as well.
174: 152: 131: 54: 613: 592: 580: 556: 540: 536: 584: 277: 524: 262: 17: 576: 568: 560: 564: 544: 292: 708: 36: 572: 707:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
249: 228: 124: 368:
Very useful here at Wikiatlas. What, this site is an encyclopedia and not a street directory? Oh, then
171: 149: 128: 185: 339:
is a directory: it is not a list of loosely assicated topics, or a list for conducting business. –
246: 49: 645:
on the analogy of the above articles,and the general way decisions are going, the solution is a
336: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
498: 377: 415: 356: 340: 197: 690: 482: 450: 328: 214: 196:
It's amazing how many streets and roads in Hong Kong have their own articles already.
621: 515: 474: 462: 429: 401: 332: 120: 678: 389: 106: 265:
people can be consulted. I really don't think this article can be considered in
665: 632: 502: 433: 405: 373: 324: 310: 232: 352: 449:. If it can be renamed and de-listed. i.e. turned into a coherent article. 425: 269:
from the others that apparently fall within that project, and may have been
404:, in that they are ALL meaningful to at least 50,000 people? I doupt it.-- 651: 355:, plus that it is important to differentiate a list from a directory.--: 301:
It may be that together these effectively enhance the ability of reader
428:
article says the 2006 population was 6,864,000. With reference to the
609: 245:
This article has the potential to be turned into something useful.
701:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
388:, but a fair few of the streets link to disambig pages. 102: 98: 94: 119:
Prod contested. This article meets criteria for what
213:Change to keep per everyone else who said to keep. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 549:Category:Buildings and structures in New York City 231:. No reason to delete this; improve as needed. 227:This is just as good as any other article in the 711:). No further edits should be made to this page. 288:List of buildings, sites and areas in Hong Kong 627:So what I'd like to hear is, what is a useful 585:Category:Streets and squares in New York City 8: 589:Category:Railroad terminals in New York City 283:List of airports and heliports in Hong Kong 553:Category:Transportation in New York City 529:Category:Transportation in New York City 164:: This debate has been included in the 141:: This debate has been included in the 499:usefulness is not an inclusion criteria 601:Category:Bus stations in New York City 69:List of streets and roads in Hong Kong 61:List of streets and roads in Hong Kong 577:Category:Grand Street (New York City) 7: 597:List of streetcar lines in the Bronx 533:Bridges and tunnels in New York City 614:Tunnels underneath the River Thames 593:Railroad terminals in New York City 261:and postpone any action, until the 166:list of Hong Kong-related deletions 143:list of Hong Kong-related deletions 24: 581:Category:Fifth Avenue (Manhattan) 557:Category:Streets in New York City 541:Category:Tunnels in New York City 537:Category:Bridges in New York City 303:to find the information they seek 278:List of Hong Kong-related topics 525:Transportation in New York City 514:Well, I know this more of what 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 608:haven't looked at places like 1: 569:Category:Streets in Manhattan 561:Category:Streets in the Bronx 274:another. Here are a couple: 565:Category:Streets in Brooklyn 545:Expressways in New York City 211:Knowledge is not for lists. 728: 694:05:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 573:Category:Streets in Queens 293:List of areas of Hong Kong 55:07:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC) 682:16:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 669:11:37, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 656:07:25, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 636:03:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 506:01:15, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 490:14:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 466:13:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 454:12:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 437:03:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 420:02:44, 7 April 2007 (UTC) 409:09:41, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 393:09:05, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 381:08:48, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 361:06:24, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 344:06:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 314:05:43, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 252:03:30, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 236:03:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 218:02:35, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 201:01:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 189:00:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 175:00:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 153:00:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 132:00:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC) 704:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 271:fostered by the project 229:Category:Lists of roads 612:. (hmm, peeking I see 125:Transport in Hong Kong 400:Do the road all pass 263:WikiProject Hong Kong 182:Rename and de-list 337:list of countries 169: 155: 146: 53: 719: 706: 486: 475:WP:NOT#DIRECTORY 160: 147: 137: 121:Knowledge is not 110: 92: 52: 34: 727: 726: 722: 721: 720: 718: 717: 716: 715: 709:deletion review 702: 484: 83: 67: 64: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 725: 723: 714: 713: 697: 696: 684: 672: 658: 640: 639: 638: 625: 617: 605: 604: 603: 509: 492: 479:fifteen months 468: 456: 441: 440: 439: 422: 395: 383: 363: 346: 317: 316: 298: 297: 296: 295: 290: 285: 280: 255: 254: 239: 238: 221: 220: 204: 203: 191: 186:SchmuckyTheCat 178: 177: 157: 156: 117: 116: 63: 58: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 724: 712: 710: 705: 699: 698: 695: 692: 688: 685: 683: 680: 676: 673: 670: 667: 662: 659: 657: 654: 653: 648: 644: 641: 637: 634: 630: 626: 623: 618: 615: 611: 606: 602: 598: 594: 590: 586: 582: 578: 574: 570: 566: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 526: 523: 522: 521: 520: 517: 513: 510: 507: 504: 500: 496: 493: 491: 488: 487: 480: 476: 472: 469: 467: 464: 460: 457: 455: 452: 448: 447: 442: 438: 435: 431: 427: 423: 421: 417: 412: 411: 410: 407: 403: 399: 396: 394: 391: 387: 384: 382: 379: 375: 371: 367: 364: 362: 358: 354: 350: 347: 345: 342: 338: 335:as much as a 334: 330: 326: 322: 319: 318: 315: 312: 308: 304: 300: 299: 294: 291: 289: 286: 284: 281: 279: 276: 275: 272: 268: 264: 260: 257: 256: 253: 250: 248: 247:Hornandsoccer 244: 241: 240: 237: 234: 230: 226: 223: 222: 219: 216: 212: 210: 206: 205: 202: 199: 195: 192: 190: 187: 183: 180: 179: 176: 173: 167: 163: 159: 158: 154: 151: 144: 140: 136: 135: 134: 133: 130: 126: 122: 114: 108: 104: 100: 96: 91: 87: 82: 78: 74: 70: 66: 65: 62: 59: 57: 56: 51: 50:Seraphimblade 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 703: 700: 686: 674: 660: 650: 646: 642: 628: 511: 494: 483: 478: 470: 461:and cleanup 458: 445: 443: 397: 385: 369: 365: 348: 320: 306: 305:. And that 302: 270: 266: 258: 242: 224: 208: 207: 193: 181: 161: 138: 118: 46:no consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 485:RGTraynor 416:Raphaelmak 357:Raphaelmak 353:User:Pomte 198:Realkyhick 691:Spawn Man 629:direction 426:Hong Kong 333:directory 267:isolation 215:Acalamari 661:Comment: 647:category 463:Regan123 194:Comment: 113:View log 679:bobanny 643:Comment 512:Comment 398:Comment 390:Lugnuts 329:WP:LIST 327:. From 86:protect 81:history 687:Delete 666:Dr bab 633:Shenme 622:WP:ANI 610:London 516:WP:ATA 503:Dr bab 495:Delete 471:Delete 451:Tom M. 434:Shenme 430:WP:50k 406:Dacium 402:WP:50k 374:Calton 370:delete 325:Shenme 311:Shenme 233:Hmains 209:Delete 90:delete 444:Keep 341:Pomte 172:Luke! 150:Luke! 129:Luke! 107:views 99:watch 95:links 16:< 675:Keep 473:per 459:Keep 446:ONLY 424:The 418:: 386:Keep 378:Talk 372:. -- 366:Keep 359:: 351:per 349:Keep 323:per 321:Keep 259:Keep 243:Keep 225:keep 162:Note 139:Note 103:logs 77:talk 73:edit 652:DGG 414:--: 170:-- 168:. 148:-- 145:. 111:– ( 599:, 595:, 591:, 587:, 583:, 579:, 575:, 571:, 567:, 563:, 559:, 555:, 551:, 547:, 543:, 539:, 535:, 531:, 527:, 501:. 376:| 307:is 127:. 105:| 101:| 97:| 93:| 88:| 84:| 79:| 75:| 48:. 671:. 616:) 508:. 115:) 109:) 71:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
Seraphimblade
07:11, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
List of streets and roads in Hong Kong
List of streets and roads in Hong Kong
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Knowledge is not
Transport in Hong Kong
Luke!
00:39, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
list of Hong Kong-related deletions
Luke!
00:50, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
list of Hong Kong-related deletions
Luke!
00:51, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
SchmuckyTheCat
00:56, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Realkyhick
01:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.