390:— due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. "Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out," is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called "Porn Bios," this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting
296:. Redirecting non-notable articles to Listings of a subject which has been found to be non-notable is absurd. Playmate-hood, being inherently non-notable, does not prop up this article, nor can it prop up a List of playmates. Redirecting to non-notable lists only makes work for Admins who will have to delete these redirects later. Also, significantly, this is an inadequately-sourced BLP in a controversial area.
395:
sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see
394:
ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern
Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and
191:
is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by
Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts
269:. Does not appear to be enough nontrivial reliably sourced content to justify an independent article. This has been the outcome of most recent AFD discussions for less prominent Playmates as well the way most recently named Playmates have been handled.
216:
Google news hits over several decades, seem to clearly establish notability, being a playmate is not a criteria for deletion of otherwise notable people. Article needs improvement with additional references, not deletion.
149:
360:
386:- The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of
288:
This should have been done after consensus determined
Playmate-hood's non-notability. Should sufficient sourcing and claim of notability later be found, the article can be re-started.
180:
110:
337:
143:
317:
314:
17:
266:
48:. Procedural keep because the nomination and subsequent discussion is tainted by the noms topic ban. can be immediately relisted.
274:
391:
83:
78:
164:
87:
454:
36:
131:
270:
70:
399:
at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way.
453:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
125:
402:
This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign.
121:
440:
413:
375:
352:
329:
305:
278:
255:
230:
207:
52:
301:
157:
423:
387:
248:
223:
171:
409:
371:
348:
325:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
396:
197:
436:
201:
297:
137:
74:
397:
Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user
243:
218:
405:
367:
344:
321:
49:
104:
432:
426:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
66:
58:
447:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
235:
Nomination was made in violation of a still active topic ban
361:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
236:
100:
96:
92:
156:
431:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
196:are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the
170:
181:Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
457:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
359:Note: This debate has been included in the
336:Note: This debate has been included in the
338:list of People-related deletion discussions
358:
335:
313:Note: This debate has been added to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
267:List of Playboy Playmates of 1987
1:
198:general notability guideline
238:and so it should also be a
474:
376:20:58, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
353:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
330:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
306:19:20, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
279:16:45, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
231:03:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
208:02:58, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
450:Please do not modify it.
256:03:00, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
192:solely related to their
53:14:10, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
441:02:41, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
414:13:53, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
315:WikiProject Pornography
271:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
185:Playmate of the Month
189:Playmate of the Year
392:WP:I DON'T LIKE IT
44:The result was
443:
404:
378:
364:
355:
341:
318:list of deletions
253:
228:
205:
465:
452:
430:
428:
400:
365:
342:
332:
249:
246:
224:
221:
203:
175:
174:
160:
108:
90:
34:
473:
472:
468:
467:
466:
464:
463:
462:
461:
455:deletion review
448:
439:
421:
384:Procedural Keep
312:
252:
244:
240:procedural keep
227:
219:
183:. Being chosen
117:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
471:
469:
460:
459:
444:
435:
429:
418:
417:
416:
380:
379:
356:
333:
309:
308:
282:
281:
260:
259:
258:
250:
225:
178:
177:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
470:
458:
456:
451:
445:
442:
438:
434:
427:
425:
420:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
398:
393:
389:
385:
382:
381:
377:
373:
369:
362:
357:
354:
350:
346:
339:
334:
331:
327:
323:
319:
316:
311:
310:
307:
303:
299:
295:
293:
287:
284:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
261:
257:
254:
247:
241:
237:
234:
233:
232:
229:
222:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
206:
199:
195:
190:
186:
182:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:Find sources:
115:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
449:
446:
422:
401:
383:
291:
289:
285:
262:
239:
213:
194:playmatehood
193:
188:
184:
179:
167:
161:
153:
146:
140:
134:
128:
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
144:free images
388:WP:BEFORE
368:• Gene93k
345:• Gene93k
322:• Gene93k
298:Dekkappai
67:Luann Lee
59:Luann Lee
424:Relisted
294:redirect
263:Redirect
111:View log
406:Carrite
202:Damiens
150:WP refs
138:scholar
84:protect
79:history
50:Spartaz
286:Delete
122:Google
88:delete
433:Logan
245:Monty
220:Monty
165:JSTOR
126:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
437:Talk
410:talk
372:talk
349:talk
326:talk
302:talk
275:talk
214:Keep
158:FENS
132:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
46:keep
366:--
292:NOT
290:Do
265:to
251:845
226:845
204:.rf
187:or
172:TWL
109:– (
412:)
374:)
363:.
351:)
340:.
328:)
320:.
304:)
277:)
242:.
200:.
152:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
408:(
370:(
347:(
343:—
324:(
300:(
273:(
176:)
168:·
162:·
154:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.