395:— due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. "Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out," is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called "Porn Bios," this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting
400:
sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see
399:
ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern
Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and
196:
is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by
Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts
353:
428:- the combination of being a Playboy centerfold, her film career, and lawsuit make her notable. Note that whilst being a Playboy centerfold does not guarantee notability, it does not guarantee non-notability either.--
154:
326:
352:- Her filmography is verified by a review of her Google Books hits. Should probably also mention something about her lawsuit about their playboy footage being used in another pornography video.
391:- The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of
115:
185:
148:
303:
283:
280:
88:
83:
92:
17:
235:. But it came out that was just one of those small imperceptible roles. She is listed as an actress on 14 titles on imdb, and her
75:
222:
217:. Movie credits probably satisfy WP:ENT and would justify an independent article when combined with Playmate-related coverage.
169:
136:
396:
231:
At first, I was also of this impression. She appears in at least one somewhat popular movie of the time, Michael J. Fox's
452:
36:
218:
404:
at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way.
130:
451:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
360:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
437:
418:
381:
364:
341:
318:
295:
269:
226:
208:
126:
57:
53:
407:
This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign.
176:
79:
356:
162:
392:
372:: If HW says she's notable (and his standards are not lax), there's no need for me to say more.--
414:
337:
314:
291:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
142:
433:
49:
401:
263:
202:
71:
63:
402:
Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user
374:
239:
is all of them is minor (with the likely exception of playboy direct-to-videos like
410:
333:
310:
287:
109:
429:
201:
are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the general notability criteria.
232:
247:). in the movies pages I followed, you can only find her name by clicking
445:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
327:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
105:
101:
97:
161:
175:
186:Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
455:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
325:Note: This debate has been included in the
302:Note: This debate has been included in the
304:list of People-related deletion discussions
324:
301:
279:Note: This debate has been added to the
262:on Sexy Shorts makes her pass WP:ENT? --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
245:Shape-Up for Sensational Sex
472:
342:23:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
319:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
296:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
270:04:39, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
227:03:05, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
209:02:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
448:Please do not modify it.
197:solely related to their
32:Please do not modify it.
438:10:36, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
419:14:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
382:00:48, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
365:22:00, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
281:WikiProject Pornography
58:14:47, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
258:on Private School or
219:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
190:Playmate of the Month
194:Playmate of the Year
397:WP:I DON'T LIKE IT
44:The result was
409:
380:
344:
330:
321:
307:
284:list of deletions
267:
206:
463:
450:
405:
379:
331:
308:
298:
265:
204:
180:
179:
165:
113:
95:
34:
471:
470:
466:
465:
464:
462:
461:
460:
459:
453:deletion review
446:
389:Procedural Keep
278:
188:. Being chosen
122:
86:
72:Lynda Wiesmeier
70:
67:
64:Lynda Wiesmeier
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
469:
467:
458:
457:
441:
440:
422:
421:
385:
384:
367:
357:Morbidthoughts
346:
345:
322:
299:
275:
274:
273:
272:
260:girl in shower
252:
183:
182:
119:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
468:
456:
454:
449:
443:
442:
439:
435:
431:
427:
424:
423:
420:
416:
412:
408:
403:
398:
394:
390:
387:
386:
383:
377:
376:
371:
368:
366:
362:
358:
354:
351:
348:
347:
343:
339:
335:
328:
323:
320:
316:
312:
305:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
277:
276:
271:
268:
261:
257:
254:Does playing
253:
250:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
229:
228:
224:
220:
216:
213:
212:
211:
210:
207:
200:
195:
191:
187:
178:
174:
171:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
138:
135:
132:
128:
125:
124:Find sources:
120:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
56:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
447:
444:
425:
406:
388:
373:
369:
349:
259:
255:
249:full credits
248:
244:
240:
236:
214:
199:playmatehood
198:
193:
189:
184:
172:
166:
158:
151:
145:
139:
133:
123:
52:
45:
43:
31:
28:
256:school girl
149:free images
393:WP:BEFORE
334:• Gene93k
311:• Gene93k
288:• Gene93k
233:Teen Wolf
375:Milowent
241:R.S.V.P.
116:View log
411:Carrite
264:Damiens
203:Damiens
155:WP refs
143:scholar
89:protect
84:history
430:Toddy1
127:Google
93:delete
54:tizzle
170:JSTOR
131:books
110:views
102:watch
98:links
50:Scien
16:<
434:talk
426:Keep
415:talk
370:Keep
361:talk
350:Keep
338:talk
315:talk
292:talk
243:and
237:role
223:talk
215:Keep
163:FENS
137:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
48:. —
46:keep
332:--
266:.rf
205:.rf
192:or
177:TWL
114:– (
436:)
417:)
378:•
363:)
355:.
340:)
329:.
317:)
306:.
294:)
286:.
225:)
157:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
432:(
413:(
359:(
336:(
313:(
309:—
290:(
251:.
221:(
181:)
173:·
167:·
159:·
152:·
146:·
140:·
134:·
129:(
121:(
118:)
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.