208:
allowed to continue. It is to educate readers about the application, not to promote it, You don't exactly see something in there like, "This App is better than the rest, Use it and only it, It will be the only thing you need", And the testers probably haven't explored the software completely yet so there may be parts they don't know about yet. In short, I fail to see how this does not pass the criterion for articles, and I believe that many of the beta testers would love to contribute while their testing the software. It wasn't made by a certain company but then again, neither was the
Replacement Firmware FlashMe for the DS but that still has an article. This is simply a Replacement application for NintendoDS Slot-1 flash cartridges. I also believe that this article would become more proper given time. It was only started a little while ago. Thank you for your time and please reconsider the deletion of this article. ShadowEO (talk) 06:16, 31 May 2009 (UTC) Retrieved from "
415:
nothing that any of us can do to change that. I don't understand why you can't accept GBATemp citations, They post news about homebrew applications. The snippets for such news are on the front page but sure, the actual articles themselves are in forum posts, that's so that people can comment on the application/news post. If you take a look at it maybe you'll see that, just go there and click any news post and hit either Source or View post. In fact, here is a link to the specified post and if you see, all news posts are replicated on the forums via an automated news posting bot.
361:- I added a source from a site called GameGrep to the references of the article. We are working on references, also keywords you might want to add into your searches XMBLite Nintendo DS NDS Soulanger, He named his project after a Flilipno dish that is made with cheeseburger I believe. Thank you for giving us the time to look for references.
207:
also... I don't see how it promotes a non-notable piece of software. For us (NDS Homebrew Users) it's pretty notable. Is it not notable because it's unreleased? If so then why has ID Tech 5 not been flagged for deletion since it's non-released. I agree fully with
Fgghjjkll that this article should be
414:
I have read them, and I'm trying really hard to keep this article here. This is a very big project for
NintendoDS Homebrew and is as of yet in closed beta and unreleased as my recent edits to the post say. The author prefers to use the GBATemp forums for status updates and announcements and there's
129:
444:
Status updates, news posts, discussion forums etc are not independent and reliable third party sources. What's needed is a reference to some statement or analysis by a respected industry magazine, guru or whatever, or something like that. Please read
535:
has been tagged as inadequately referenced and quite right too. Maybe it should be challenged. Any editor, yourself included, is at liberty to challenge any article through a deletion process such as this one. But that's not a reason why
148:
170:
121:
548:. I fail to see how unreleased software can be in any meaningful sense notable, unless it's a forthcoming version of or enhancement to something that's already notable.
580:
Well? What I said is true? This has been up for a day now. Usually you guys answer us almost about an hour after we post, Is there something wrong?
128:
Declining speedy, although it's a close call. Language suggests the author is or is friends with the developer, but isn't explicit. 18 hits
88:
83:
92:
390:
75:
17:
516:
only has official pages and a reference to BatchDPG? so if we had an official page for this software, would the page be saved?
342:
If they exist (which they don't) it should not take you long. This debate will probably be running for another couple of days.
330:
386:
512:
Please justify this to me, We're getting this article deleted because we cited references to forum posts and videos when
630:
36:
629:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
616:
595:
575:
557:
525:
506:
483:
458:
427:
409:
370:
351:
334:
306:
280:
261:
242:
221:
202:
181:
159:
137:
57:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
257:
79:
591:
318:
253:
71:
63:
553:
502:
454:
405:
347:
302:
238:
612:
581:
567:
517:
479:
419:
378:
362:
326:
276:
217:
198:
132:, but they're all in Spanish so I can't evaluate. The given references are messageboards. - Dank (
53:
566:
Technically though this is an enhancement of the FlashCart firmwares as it adds features to them.
585:
571:
521:
423:
382:
366:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
545:
541:
494:
290:
549:
498:
450:
401:
343:
298:
295:"reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy"
234:
490:
446:
400:
That's not an adequate reference. Please read and follow wikipedia policy on references.
608:
475:
322:
272:
213:
194:
177:
155:
133:
49:
231:
289:
If you want to save it please add suitable references that meet
Knowledge (XXG)'s
109:
416:
540:
article should not be deleted. It appears to fail two key wikipedia policies -
532:
314:
OK....give me time to find those "Reliable
Sources" you are talking about.
209:
193:
and also, you can use google's translate feature to view foreign articles
623:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
513:
116:
105:
101:
97:
489:
Of course they're not! Please read the guidelines at
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
633:). No further edits should be made to this page.
149:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
210:http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:MENUdo_(Homebrew)
171:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
8:
252:- Not notable, lacks any good references.
165:
143:
417:GBATemp News Post for project in question
169:: This debate has been included in the
147:: This debate has been included in the
189:snip* nvm......whats wrong with forums?
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
607:IRC quotes? legitimate IRC quotes?
24:
271:- It is still in an early stage.
1:
650:
470:youtube videos...are they
297:. I'm unable to find any.
626:Please do not modify it.
617:09:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
596:05:31, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
576:16:46, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
558:10:02, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
526:09:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
507:08:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
484:08:24, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
459:08:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
428:08:25, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
410:06:47, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
371:23:32, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
352:07:29, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
335:22:50, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
307:12:13, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
281:09:34, 1 June 2009 (UTC)
262:22:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
243:08:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
222:07:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
203:00:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
182:12:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
160:12:25, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
138:12:24, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
58:21:28, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
391:few or no other edits
393:outside this topic.
232:policy on notability
497:. It's very clear.
493:and the policy at
230:- fails wikipedia
44:The result was
394:
338:
321:comment added by
184:
174:
162:
152:
72:MENUdo (Homebrew)
64:MENUdo (Homebrew)
641:
628:
599:
474:adequate enough?
376:
337:
315:
175:
153:
119:
113:
95:
34:
649:
648:
644:
643:
642:
640:
639:
638:
637:
631:deletion review
624:
589:
316:
115:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
647:
645:
636:
635:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
594:comment added
561:
560:
510:
509:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
435:
434:
433:
432:
431:
430:
374:
373:
355:
354:
312:
311:
310:
309:
284:
283:
265:
264:
246:
245:
191:
190:
186:
185:
163:
126:
125:
66:
61:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
646:
634:
632:
627:
621:
620:
619:
618:
614:
610:
597:
593:
587:
583:
579:
578:
577:
573:
569:
565:
564:
563:
562:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:verifiability
543:
539:
534:
530:
529:
528:
527:
523:
519:
515:
508:
504:
500:
496:
492:
488:
487:
486:
485:
481:
477:
473:
460:
456:
452:
448:
443:
442:
441:
440:
439:
438:
437:
436:
429:
425:
421:
418:
413:
412:
411:
407:
403:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
392:
388:
384:
380:
372:
368:
364:
360:
357:
356:
353:
349:
345:
341:
340:
339:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
287:
286:
285:
282:
278:
274:
270:
267:
266:
263:
259:
255:
254:Chuckstudios2
251:
248:
247:
244:
240:
236:
233:
229:
226:
225:
224:
223:
219:
215:
211:
205:
204:
200:
196:
188:
187:
183:
179:
172:
168:
164:
161:
157:
150:
146:
142:
141:
140:
139:
135:
131:
123:
118:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
625:
622:
606:
537:
511:
471:
469:
375:
358:
313:
294:
268:
249:
227:
206:
192:
178:push to talk
166:
156:push to talk
144:
134:push to talk
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
590:—Preceding
531:I see that
389:) has made
317:—Preceding
176:-- - Dank (
154:-- - Dank (
542:notability
609:Fgghjjkll
533:Moonshell
514:Moonshell
476:Fgghjjkll
323:Fgghjjkll
273:Fgghjjkll
214:Fgghjjkll
195:Fgghjjkll
50:Fritzpoll
582:ShadowEO
568:ShadowEO
518:ShadowEO
420:ShadowEO
387:contribs
379:ShadowEO
363:ShadowEO
331:contribs
319:unsigned
291:criteria
122:View log
592:undated
89:protect
84:history
495:WP:VER
250:Delete
228:Delete
117:delete
93:delete
46:delete
491:WP:RS
447:WP:RS
120:) – (
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
613:talk
586:talk
572:talk
554:talk
550:andy
544:and
538:this
522:talk
503:talk
499:andy
480:talk
455:talk
451:andy
424:talk
406:talk
402:andy
383:talk
367:talk
359:Save
348:talk
344:andy
327:talk
303:talk
299:andy
277:talk
269:Save
258:talk
239:talk
235:andy
218:talk
199:talk
167:Note
145:Note
130:here
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
588:)
472:not
615:)
574:)
556:)
524:)
505:)
482:)
457:)
449:.
426:)
408:)
385:•
377:—
369:)
350:)
333:)
329:•
305:)
293::
279:)
260:)
241:)
220:)
212:"
201:)
180:)
173:.
158:)
151:.
136:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
48:.
611:(
598:.
584:(
570:(
552:(
520:(
501:(
478:(
453:(
422:(
404:(
381:(
365:(
346:(
325:(
301:(
275:(
256:(
237:(
216:(
197:(
124:)
114:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.