511:. After checking the references for the article, I no longer believe that this is non-notable given the reviews by non-affiliated sources, as well as the tools being cited in two different technology patents from Apple. There are certainly issues with content that need to be corrected (i.e. make it less of an advertisement) but I don't see that as grounds for deletion -- just grounds for fixing the article.
517:
article, or delete and add a section in that article about MKVToolNix. I hate the deletionist attitude towards non-notable articles, but honestly, the only people who'll even be looking up MKVToolNix on here are people who already know the software and just want to see what
Knowledge (XXG) has to say
271:
analogy... Each of this particular pair is notable (not that there is a rule for that, just in the world of
Matroska, if you decide that MKV is important then MKVToolNix is important, even if you never use it). The second issue was incorporation of the tool description into the format description, so
573:
I'm curious where you see "advertizing". I never used this software, and I'm not normally in the habit to write articles about stuff I don't know, this was a special case for a decenct link on a
Commons help page I care about. Same idea as
424:. For the record, this tool is my favorite. But its article? Unfortunately, it is written like an advertisement. The article also fails to show significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Oh, and
165:
118:
196:
Not notable. Mostly first party sources, with the exceptions of brief mention in a tutorial, and promotional pieces on
Softpedia which anyway is not a reliable secondary source.
399:
159:
303:
Your not yet existing MKV tools are not 11 years old in 19 languages, and have not yet made it into admittedly obscure Apple patents, a
Forensics book,
272:
if you look at ODF, PDF, etc. not only at MKV you will realize that it makes sense to have articles for tools separate from articles for formats.
239:
whether another article exists, and so its topic is notable, is not a reason to keep this one. Certainly the status of two very different topics (
125:
254:
203:
17:
530:
464:
91:
86:
220:
is also notable. And like ODF is not merged with LO, these two should stay separate. P.S. I have added non-primary sources.
95:
480:
180:
612:
147:
40:
78:
575:
551:! I myself am the developer of an antivirus program and a backup solution. You don't see me advertising them in
429:
287:
Nonsense. I could write my own MKV processing utilities in a few days. Would that make them notable? No. Only
582:, the references should be actually trimmed to a minimum required for notability as determined in this AfD. –
331:
564:
437:
354:
141:
236:
335:
548:
454:
be rewritten to be more informative and less advertorial, and they don't need to be deleted for that. //
608:
403:
36:
342:
it's useful for a few other pages. I've removed "stub" after adding the infobox, the topic is covered,
137:
591:
568:
535:
498:
469:
441:
413:
385:
298:
281:
258:
229:
207:
60:
587:
381:
371:
240:
277:
249:
225:
198:
173:
187:
560:
526:
494:
460:
433:
294:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
607:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
578:, but that's software I actually use. I'm also not sure that this article needs any kind of
583:
377:
367:
315:
82:
288:
153:
425:
273:
221:
521:
490:
455:
318:) video software sites, the unanimously unreliable but nevertheless often referenced
304:
244:
112:
217:
74:
66:
53:
483:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
327:
552:
319:
514:
339:
311:
213:
323:
556:
601:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
284:
P.S. What in your opinion article or MKVToolNix are missing?
450:
I don't buy the advertisement argument, sorry. Articles
108:
104:
100:
172:
489:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
186:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
615:). No further edits should be made to this page.
400:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
398:Note: This debate has been included in the
397:
366:ranking 110,537 globally surprised me. –
334:. The help page was the reason for this
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
269:tool(s) to manipulate the format
374:) 10:55, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
235:It doesn’t work like that. Per
1:
592:01:07, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
569:02:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
536:17:09, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
499:07:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
470:17:07, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
386:14:51, 11 February 2015 (UTC)
61:04:27, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
442:05:07, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
414:13:25, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
299:20:04, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
289:reliable third-party sources
282:07:40, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
259:06:02, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
247:?) is entirely irrelevant.--
230:05:50, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
208:19:40, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
430:notability is not inherited
632:
576:Microsoft Download Manager
604:Please do not modify it.
559:articles. Best regards,
32:Please do not modify it.
432:. Sorry. Best regards,
338:article; together with
316:counting article links
513:Merge into the main
241:Open Document Format
48:The result was
534:
501:
468:
416:
332:Commons help page
314:site, reputable (
252:
216:is notable, then
201:
623:
606:
524:
488:
486:
484:
458:
411:
407:
349:
297:
248:
197:
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
58:
34:
631:
630:
626:
625:
624:
622:
621:
620:
619:
613:deletion review
602:
509:Keep and expand
502:
479:
477:
409:
405:
388:
360:
357:
353:
347:
345:
292:
257:
206:
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
54:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
629:
627:
618:
617:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
539:
538:
487:
476:
475:
474:
473:
472:
445:
444:
418:
417:
395:
394:
393:
392:
391:
390:
389:
375:
358:
355:
351:
343:
253:
250:JohnBlackburne
202:
199:JohnBlackburne
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
628:
616:
614:
610:
605:
599:
593:
589:
585:
581:
577:
572:
571:
570:
566:
562:
561:Codename Lisa
558:
554:
550:
546:
543:
542:
541:
540:
537:
532:
528:
523:
519:
516:
510:
508:
504:
503:
500:
496:
492:
485:
482:
471:
466:
462:
457:
453:
449:
448:
447:
446:
443:
439:
435:
434:Codename Lisa
431:
427:
423:
420:
419:
415:
412:
401:
396:
387:
383:
379:
373:
369:
365:
361:
341:
337:
333:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
310:
307:articles, an
306:
305:Linux Journal
302:
301:
300:
296:
290:
286:
285:
283:
279:
275:
270:
266:
262:
261:
260:
256:
251:
246:
242:
238:
237:WP:OTHERSTUFF
234:
233:
232:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
210:
209:
205:
200:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
603:
600:
579:
549:WP:NOTADVERT
544:
512:
506:
505:
478:
451:
421:
363:
312:matroska.org
308:
268:
264:
245:Libre Office
214:Matroska/MKV
211:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
160:free images
584:Be..anyone
378:Be..anyone
368:Be..anyone
309:"official"
218:MKVToolNix
75:MKVToolNix
67:MKVToolNix
609:talk page
553:antivirus
518:about it.
426:Absolwent
376:Updated:
336:requested
320:Softpedia
274:Absolwent
222:Absolwent
37:talk page
611:or in a
522:coldacid
515:Matroska
491:Missvain
481:Relisted
456:coldacid
340:mkvmerge
330:, and a
324:wikidata
119:View log
39:or in a
531:contrib
465:contrib
291:would.
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
580:expand
557:backup
545:Oppose
422:Delete
410:MERICA
362:. The
328:frwiki
265:format
263:It is
138:Google
96:delete
507:Merge
364:alexa
359:fixed
352:still
348:genre
255:deeds
204:deeds
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
56:Nakon
16:<
588:talk
565:talk
555:and
547:per
527:talk
495:talk
461:talk
438:talk
406:ORTH
382:talk
372:talk
346:the
344:only
295:Keφr
278:talk
267:and
243:and
226:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
50:keep
520://
452:can
356:TBD
350:is
212:If
188:TWL
117:– (
590:)
567:)
497:)
440:)
428:,
402:.
384:)
326:,
322:,
293:—
280:)
228:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
52:.
586:(
563:(
533:)
529:|
525:(
493:(
467:)
463:|
459:(
436:(
408:A
404:N
380:(
370:(
276:(
224:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.