477:
hmm.. I am unsure but you don't seem to be agreeing with NWEB guideline. It is a reasonable query that why would a newspaper, magazine or web portal write about one among them. What is one supposed to receive is 'mention', -about their contents in other reliable media independent of them and that's
389:
I think, you are looking for sources that are fully centric on subject and seeking to establish GNG. But there is another criteria, particularly for websites, a website may be considered worthy of inclusion per WEBCRIT#1, -if its content has been published by multiple independent, reliable sources.
353:
The problem I have with most, if not all of those sources is the "non-trivial" bit. All of them are about the Indian motor industry, and have a brief mention to someone in
Motoroids giving a passing mention on the subject in hand. What I could really do with is something that actually talks
231:
reliable news hits that mention the site. As I don't have enough knowledge of the motor industry or India, I think AfD is the best place to discuss what we do with it. An article with this title has been at AfD before, but I can't easily tell if it was the same thing.
519:, specifically "trivial coverage, such as: a brief summary of the nature of the content". I'm not trying to be a grumpy old deletionist here; seriously, if you can point me in the direction of a couple of sources that have Motoroids as their
510:
Motoroids, briefly discusses its history, its popularity, and any famous controversies - but I can't find anything beyond articles about other things that say "Motoroid's 'x' says 'y'". The best source I've found is
195:
226:
This website is a bit of an oddity. A Google news search for its name brings up many many hits on its own website, all related to the Indian automotive industry, and a web search brings up a smattering of
553:
Here you are asking to delete it because it doesn't meet GNG, I'm to keep it because it does meet NWEB. If we had to determine notability of websites by GNG, we would not have NWEB at first place.
93:
88:
83:
148:
270:
366:
clean up the article, but without some good solid sources that have
Motoroids as their main topic, not just as a soundbite, I'd struggle to be able to write anything.
189:
250:
155:
78:
405:
317:
326:
17:
547:
531:
479:
470:
399:
382:
302:
240:
515:
and that has one paragraph that says little more than "motoroids is a motoring website and forum". That's it. To me, that fails
506:
I'm exhausted. I've been through about 5-6 pages each of web, news and book searches just to find a source that is specifically
299:
the content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself..
414:
320:
606:
565:
533:
501:
472:
453:
384:
344:
282:
262:
242:
61:
121:
116:
586:
314:
411:
391:
308:
210:
125:
625:
462:
if this AfD closes as "Keep" but the article still cites little more than itself, Facebook or Alexa, wouldn't you say?
402:
305:
40:
177:
408:
323:
523:, I will happily improve the article myself and withdraw this AfD. But until I find them, that can't happen. Sorry.
108:
512:
329:
311:
441:
I am not sure what can we do with these sources, but subject appears to be satisfying our inclusion criteria.
359:
171:
621:
596:
36:
167:
529:
468:
380:
238:
516:
486:
294:
112:
560:
496:
448:
339:
203:
217:
55:
104:
67:
278:
258:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
620:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
485:
If there are presently some sort of unreliable sources used in the existing article, we can
524:
463:
459:
375:
233:
554:
490:
442:
369:
333:
183:
358:
about
Motoroids itself. One of the problems I have with AfD is despite the mantra of "
395:
274:
254:
142:
436:
433:
430:
427:
424:
421:
398:
are reputable reliable sources -who has published contents of
Motoroids website,
489:
that in a single edit either by removing them or replacing with a better one.
589:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
538:
Last comment, I'm not willing to go farther. If "Motoroids" is published as
417:
458:
I'll dig through IB Times and see what I can do, but to me it's a
614:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
542:, it would meet GNG. If their contents have been published as
546:, it would meet WEBCRIT#1 . I am arguing for latter one (
301:). Here are some sources that substantiate the claim, -
138:
134:
130:
202:
595:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
216:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
628:). No further edits should be made to this page.
94:Articles for deletion/Motoroids (4th nomination)
89:Articles for deletion/Motoroids (3rd nomination)
84:Articles for deletion/Motoroids (2nd nomination)
271:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
269:Note: This debate has been included in the
249:Note: This debate has been included in the
268:
251:list of India-related deletion discussions
248:
76:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
74:
24:
362:", its an excellent opportunity
79:Articles for deletion/Motoroids
1:
607:04:32, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
332:in Indian reliable sources).
62:06:18, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
566:21:50, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
534:16:53, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
502:16:51, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
473:14:58, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
454:14:17, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
385:11:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
345:18:13, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
283:14:25, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
263:14:25, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
243:11:05, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
416:, . There are some hits on
645:
617:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
293:-Subject may meet
48:The result was
609:
285:
265:
636:
619:
604:
600:
594:
592:
590:
563:
557:
499:
493:
451:
445:
374:- can you help?
373:
360:It's not cleanup
342:
336:
221:
220:
206:
158:
146:
128:
60:
58:
34:
644:
643:
639:
638:
637:
635:
634:
633:
632:
626:deletion review
615:
610:
602:
598:
585:
583:
561:
555:
497:
491:
478:my core point (
460:phyrric victory
449:
443:
367:
340:
334:
163:
154:
119:
103:
100:
98:
71:
56:
53:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
642:
640:
631:
630:
593:
582:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
551:
483:
439:
348:
347:
287:
286:
266:
224:
223:
160:
99:
97:
96:
91:
86:
81:
75:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
641:
629:
627:
623:
618:
612:
611:
608:
605:
591:
588:
567:
564:
558:
552:
549:
545:
541:
537:
536:
535:
532:
530:
528:
527:
522:
518:
514:
509:
505:
504:
503:
500:
494:
488:
484:
481:
476:
475:
474:
471:
469:
467:
466:
461:
457:
456:
455:
452:
446:
440:
437:
434:
431:
428:
425:
422:
419:
415:
412:
409:
406:
403:
400:
397:
396:Silicon India
393:
388:
387:
386:
383:
381:
379:
378:
371:
365:
361:
357:
352:
351:
350:
349:
346:
343:
337:
331:
327:
324:
321:
318:
315:
312:
309:
306:
303:
300:
296:
292:
289:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
267:
264:
260:
256:
252:
247:
246:
245:
244:
241:
239:
237:
236:
230:
219:
215:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
169:
166:
165:Find sources:
161:
157:
153:
150:
144:
140:
136:
132:
127:
123:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
101:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
80:
77:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
57:FreeRangeFrog
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
616:
613:
584:
548:one example.
543:
539:
525:
520:
507:
464:
376:
363:
356:specifically
355:
298:
290:
234:
228:
225:
213:
207:
199:
192:
186:
180:
174:
164:
151:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
562:Let's talk!
498:Let's talk!
450:Let's talk!
341:Let's talk!
330:97,800 hits
328:(There are
190:free images
544:main topic
540:main topic
526:Ritchie333
521:main topic
517:WP:WEBCRIT
465:Ritchie333
377:Ritchie333
295:WEBCRIT #1
235:Ritchie333
622:talk page
556:Anupmehra
492:Anupmehra
480:like this
444:Anupmehra
370:Titodutta
335:Anupmehra
275:• Gene93k
255:• Gene93k
105:Motoroids
68:Motoroids
37:talk page
624:or in a
587:Relisted
513:this one
418:HighBeam
392:IB Times
149:View log
39:or in a
196:WP refs
184:scholar
122:protect
117:history
603:MERICA
168:Google
126:delete
508:about
420:too -
229:maybe
211:JSTOR
172:books
156:Stats
143:views
135:watch
131:links
16:<
599:ORTH
394:and
291:Keep
279:talk
259:talk
204:FENS
178:news
139:logs
113:talk
109:edit
487:fix
438:, .
218:TWL
147:– (
550:).
482:).
435:,
432:,
429:,
426:,
423:,
413:,
410:,
407:,
404:,
401:,
364:to
325:,
322:,
319:,
316:,
313:,
310:,
307:,
304:,
281:)
273:.
261:)
253:.
198:)
141:|
137:|
133:|
129:|
124:|
120:|
115:|
111:|
52:.
601:A
597:N
559:-
495:-
447:-
372::
368:@
338:-
297:(
277:(
257:(
222:)
214:·
208:·
200:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
170:(
162:(
159:)
152:·
145:)
107:(
54:§
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.