198:
This article feels gratuitous, at best. The company wasn't even large enough to have its own page on
Knowledge (XXG). I find it odd, that on the political scandals page it is a duck out of water and do not feel as if it adds any value to Knowledge (XXG) as a whole. After spending several months as an
340:
Perhaps the deletion nominator's concern about the article could be addressed by putting it in context of other political scandals? How big is this relative to other scandals? How is it similar/different vs. other scandals? The deletion nomination mentions "the political scandals page", what is
199:
editor for a few categories, I understand that everyone wants to be fair, but at what point do we allow
Knowledge (XXG) to be a tattle tale platform for vengeance instead of a source for relevant information that matters.
167:
335:. It doesn't bother me at all that the company "Moxie Media" did not have a Knowledge (XXG) page; it could be a tiny operation whose name was given to the scandal which is far more noteworthy than the company.
346:
240:
331:. I don't think the nomination gives any reason for deletion consistent with our guidelines for deletions. It looks like a solid article, it has multiple sources, it meets
161:
220:
120:
260:
341:
that? In the page's incoming links, I don't see a political scandals list-article. Was it just removed from such a list-article? I see there exists a
127:
93:
88:
97:
80:
17:
182:
149:
360:
306:
282:
384:
40:
268:
248:
228:
143:
342:
365:
321:
297:
272:
252:
232:
208:
62:
139:
84:
189:
264:
244:
224:
380:
317:
293:
58:
36:
212:
175:
76:
68:
200:
155:
53:
355:
204:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
379:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
332:
350:
114:
345:
with subpages for many countries, but for the U.S. it only lists
373:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
309:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
285:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
347:
List of federal political scandals in the United States
110:
106:
102:
174:
315:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
291:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
188:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
387:). No further edits should be made to this page.
241:list of Washington-related deletion discussions
221:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
259:Note: This debate has been included in the
239:Note: This debate has been included in the
219:Note: This debate has been included in the
258:
238:
218:
261:list of Law-related deletion discussions
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
211:Creating deletion discussion for
56:per low participation herein.
1:
404:
343:List of political scandals
273:22:39, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
253:22:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
233:22:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
209:22:34, 23 June 2016 (UTC)
63:11:32, 15 July 2016 (UTC)
376:Please do not modify it.
366:02:17, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
322:00:57, 8 July 2016 (UTC)
298:00:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
213:Moxie Media scandal
77:Moxie Media scandal
69:Moxie Media scandal
324:
300:
275:
265:Shawn in Montreal
255:
245:Shawn in Montreal
235:
225:Shawn in Montreal
395:
378:
363:
358:
353:
320:
314:
312:
310:
296:
290:
288:
286:
193:
192:
178:
130:
118:
100:
61:
34:
403:
402:
398:
397:
396:
394:
393:
392:
391:
385:deletion review
374:
361:
356:
351:
325:
316:
305:
303:
301:
292:
281:
279:
135:
126:
91:
75:
72:
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
401:
399:
390:
389:
369:
368:
337:
336:
313:
302:
289:
278:
277:
276:
256:
236:
196:
195:
132:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
400:
388:
386:
382:
377:
371:
370:
367:
364:
359:
354:
348:
344:
339:
338:
334:
330:
327:
326:
323:
319:
318:North America
311:
308:
299:
295:
294:North America
287:
284:
274:
270:
266:
262:
257:
254:
250:
246:
242:
237:
234:
230:
226:
222:
217:
216:
215:
214:
210:
206:
202:
191:
187:
184:
181:
177:
173:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
141:
138:
137:Find sources:
133:
129:
125:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
65:
64:
60:
59:North America
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
375:
372:
328:
304:
280:
197:
185:
179:
171:
164:
158:
152:
146:
136:
123:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
162:free images
381:talk page
37:talk page
383:or in a
307:Relisted
283:Relisted
121:View log
54:WP:NPASR
39:or in a
201:Seeger7
168:WP refs
156:scholar
94:protect
89:history
333:wp:GNG
140:Google
98:delete
183:JSTOR
144:books
128:Stats
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
349:. --
329:Keep
269:talk
249:talk
229:talk
205:talk
176:FENS
150:news
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
357:ncr
190:TWL
119:– (
362:am
352:do
271:)
263:.
251:)
243:.
231:)
223:.
207:)
170:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
52:.
267:(
247:(
227:(
203:(
194:)
186:·
180:·
172:·
165:·
159:·
153:·
147:·
142:(
134:(
131:)
124:·
117:)
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.