Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/MobiText - Knowledge

Source 📝

207:. Prod was removed by the article creator (whose account name is also associated with the software firm), though after adding links to a couple of reviews. However these reviews (one describing MobiText as "yet another similar utility") fall short of the reliable sources needed to establish notability, so I'm bringing the article to AfD on the same rationale as the Prod. 164: 119: 388:
How many sources do I need? If you do a Google search you can find many sources for MobiText, even on the product page we have 7 or so listings to different reviews.
281: 158: 224:
Nobody else is going to write a entry for it, and it's not cool to kill an article days later and I spend my own personal time writing it. Then how so did
257:"Nobody else is going to write an entry for it" -- i.e. no one but you thinks it's notable -- is a powerful argument for deletion. As to CCleaner, see 124: 304:
Notability not established, it is just yet another text editor. It doesn't need its own article. Possibly an entry could be added to
17: 92: 87: 179: 96: 146: 432: 258: 79: 40: 396: 237: 313: 140: 428: 57: 36: 305: 136: 415: 400: 382: 357: 336: 317: 293: 270: 241: 216: 172: 83: 61: 411: 392: 353: 233: 186: 309: 229: 75: 67: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
427:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
406:
Excluding download sites (not independent) and blogs (self-published), your list is empty. —
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
378: 366: 53: 289: 212: 345: 332: 266: 152: 407: 349: 202: 370: 198: 113: 344:: notability is not demonstrated, no reliable sources in the wild. Problems with 374: 285: 208: 328: 262: 225: 389: 308:, although a worrying number of those do have their own articles. 421:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
369:
lies with the editor who adds or restores material, from
109: 105: 101: 171: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 435:). No further edits should be made to this page. 346:verifiability of the already included material 282:list of Software-related deletion discussions 185: 8: 280:Note: This debate has been included in the 279: 327:- No coverage in reliable sources. -- 7: 24: 390:http://www.dyniform.net/mobitext 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 348:make this article hopeless. – 1: 201:that this software meets the 373:. Not done in this case. -- 452: 416:11:52, 22 July 2012 (UTC) 401:00:36, 22 July 2012 (UTC) 383:04:55, 20 July 2012 (UTC) 358:00:09, 18 July 2012 (UTC) 337:15:51, 17 July 2012 (UTC) 318:22:27, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 294:14:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 271:13:59, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 242:08:49, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 217:08:40, 15 July 2012 (UTC) 195:Previous Prod on grounds 62:05:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC) 424:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 306:List of text editors 408:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff 350:Dmitrij D. Czarkoff 203:notability criteria 367:burden of evidence 259:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS 48:The result was 296: 443: 426: 371:reliable sources 190: 189: 175: 127: 117: 99: 34: 451: 450: 446: 445: 444: 442: 441: 440: 439: 433:deletion review 422: 132: 123: 90: 74: 71: 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 449: 447: 438: 437: 418: 386: 385: 360: 339: 321: 320: 298: 297: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 247: 246: 245: 244: 193: 192: 129: 70: 65: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 448: 436: 434: 430: 425: 419: 417: 413: 409: 405: 404: 403: 402: 398: 394: 391: 384: 380: 376: 372: 368: 364: 361: 359: 355: 351: 347: 343: 340: 338: 334: 330: 326: 323: 322: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 300: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 278: 272: 268: 264: 260: 256: 253: 252: 251: 250: 249: 248: 243: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 222: 221: 220: 219: 218: 214: 210: 206: 204: 200: 188: 184: 181: 178: 174: 170: 166: 163: 160: 157: 154: 151: 148: 145: 142: 138: 135: 134:Find sources: 130: 126: 121: 115: 111: 107: 103: 98: 94: 89: 85: 81: 77: 73: 72: 69: 66: 64: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 423: 420: 393:Gavin Stubbs 387: 362: 341: 324: 310:CodeTheorist 301: 254: 234:Gavin Stubbs 228:make it but 196: 194: 182: 176: 168: 161: 155: 149: 143: 133: 49: 47: 31: 28: 159:free images 54:Crisco 1492 429:talk page 232:doesn't? 37:talk page 431:or in a 230:MobiText 226:CCleaner 199:evidence 120:View log 76:MobiText 68:MobiText 39:or in a 165:WP refs 153:scholar 93:protect 88:history 375:Drm310 365:- The 363:Delete 342:Delete 325:Delete 302:Delete 255:Delete 137:Google 97:delete 50:delete 286:AllyD 209:AllyD 180:JSTOR 141:books 125:Stats 114:views 106:watch 102:links 52:.  — 16:< 412:talk 397:talk 379:talk 354:talk 333:talk 329:Whpq 314:talk 290:talk 267:talk 263:EEng 238:talk 213:talk 197:"No 173:FENS 147:news 110:logs 84:talk 80:edit 58:talk 187:TWL 122:• 118:– ( 414:) 399:) 381:) 356:) 335:) 316:) 292:) 284:. 269:) 261:. 240:) 215:) 205:." 167:) 112:| 108:| 104:| 100:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 60:) 410:( 395:( 377:( 352:( 331:( 312:( 288:( 265:( 236:( 211:( 191:) 183:· 177:· 169:· 162:· 156:· 150:· 144:· 139:( 131:( 128:) 116:) 78:( 56:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Crisco 1492
talk
05:32, 23 July 2012 (UTC)
MobiText
MobiText
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
evidence
notability criteria

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.