429:. Having spent some time trying to validate this article, I am convinced that this is either a hoax or that it refers to an extremely obscure person. The sourced references may be bonafide, but not everyone mentioned in a publication is notable. Delete unless someone besides the creators of this article can ensure that this is not an obscure non-notable person or a hoax. Comments by the above editor regarding gravity and that "perhaps he is obscure" strengthens my conviction.--
380:
question did in fact exist, and held deeply considered beliefs in his respective fields of philosophy. Perhaps he is obscure, but consider the following: Gravity is only a theory. It is a set of beliefs which seem to hold true in all circumstances. We believe we know how it functions, but we cannot claim to know why. We cannot see or comprehend it, but only witness its influences. So too can we witness Mohit's influences in the references aforementioned.
502:
missed such a figure had it been attested in the sources. Also, the article claims as fact the baptism of
Constantine by Silvester I, which is generally accepted to be fiction. The supposed book cover is a blatant bit of Photoshopping. Unless a genuine authority can come in and essentially start again I think we're better off without this strange mix of (maybe) fact and fiction.
78:
any reason, AKA Tintin and
Coredesat. If you honestly believe that this article is a hoax, which it is not, please state some conflicting evidence instead of saying "delete as a hoax". Every single word in that article is true, and we should be receiving praise about writing such a detailed account of an important sage's life instead of being vilified for it.
501:
since it is, at present, impossible to separate fact from fiction. I don't believe a word written by
Pythonriot, not least because the references to Mohit in the articles to which this makes reference were in several cases added by Pythonriod - it defies belief that long-standing articles would have
77:
It has not been any of the editors of this article that have edited
Charles I. We have tirelessly worked on this article for a whole day. If you think it's a hoax, CHECK THE REFERENCES. Mohit DOES appear in there, and not in a minimal role either. We don't much appreciate users who say delete without
379:
Undisputable garbage? We live in a country where one is innocent until proven guilty. So, too is it conceivable that a man should be accepted as existing unless proven contrariwise. It is far easier to prove a man exists than to prove the opposite. Herein lies considerable evidence that the man in
133:
Ah, sorry, didn't remember that, it was my first contribution and I was playing around at school, I'd only just learned of Mohit when we were studying ancient India in World
History, and we looked him up on Knowledge (XXG) for a paper but he wasn't there, leading to the creation of this article. I
482:
Because they amount to a handful of people saying "I saw it in a book." Given the stupendous number of websites that devote huge amounts of space to every religious or philosophical teacher that ever lived, it is inconceivable that not one even mentions this guy. Possibility 1: he's the only
134:
was pretty ticked at his absence from this site, so I edited some nonsense, but the content of this article remains true, as you can see from the absence of
Charles I anywhere. And the information on the Bantu tribe is true as well, some moderator keeps deleting it, however.
704:
and move to BJAODN. Any hoax which could stand unheeded despite elaboration for months and even when it breaks the bounds of credibility to remain unquestioned for nearly a week shows sufficient guile and subterfuge to be placed in this hallowed hall of dubious
588:
better to have missing articles than misleading articles. It could always be undeleted later if someone widely trusted manages to look up the rather obscure references and discovers that this isn't a hoax, though I have to say I consider it unlikely. —
119:
came here and lied about it. Thank you. You've exposed yourself. If anyone had any remaining doubt that this is a total fabrication and outright hoax, you have made everything crystal clear. There cannot be any doubt at all, now.
324:
Can you be more specific? What stuff is in which reference? This material is extremely suspect since its authors have inserted absolutely undisputable garbage about Mohit into other articles like
Charles I, cited above, and
483:
religious teacher in history to never be mentioned on the web. Possibility 2: The whole thing is a hoax. Add in the fact that the author of the article is a proven and admitted liar, and the conclusion is inescapable.
408:
This is not a country, and the criminal burden of proof does not apply to
Knowledge (XXG) articles. Every fact must be backed by reputable sources, and the burden lies with the editor making a claim to prove it.
192:, by the author of this article, does appear to be absolute garbage, which would support the claim that the whole thing is a hoax. Google is unhelpful, as Mohit is a common given name.
176:: Clearly it is not patent nonsense. It may be a hoax, but that would need to be judged by those with knowledge of relevant history. This material was added to the article on
248:
346:, but the second also has more about his science of love. The first also talks more about his early life, as opposed to just birth location and time period. --
137:
396:
17:
732:
543:
149:
99:
557:
529:
342:
The first reference has a bit more, like Mohit's meeting with Pope
Silvester, but they overlap a lot. They both mention
776:
36:
624:
775:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
289:
392:
384:
87:
716:
523:
359:
Did either source describe how Mohit converted
England to Hinduism after the death of Charles I in 1649?
560:) are now indef-blocked for hoax vandalism. Any other involved socks should be notified at my Talk or
388:
442:
728:
537:
272:
189:
145:
95:
667:
551:
299:
746:
49:
685:
210:
761:
749:
737:
692:
675:
650:
632:
598:
572:
510:
487:
473:
457:
445:
433:
417:
363:
350:
333:
315:
303:
276:
258:
234:
218:
196:
162:
124:
68:
52:
647:
594:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
607:
107:
Don't you realize that every single edit on Knowledge (XXG) is recorded and clearly visible?
758:
177:
561:
724:
533:
268:
213:
141:
91:
663:
621:
547:
519:
294:
286:
611:
64:
Tagged as "patent nonsense" by another editor two times, but that has been contested.
565:
503:
484:
454:
410:
360:
330:
231:
193:
121:
641:
590:
470:
347:
312:
689:
616:
430:
311:
I checked out the references, there's definitely stuff about him in there --
255:
159:
65:
209:
There is no person named Mohit from the 4th century. This is a big hoax.--
712:
184:
and has apparently been unchallenged there since that time. However,
158:
Your edit to the Bantu article is evidence that you are a hoaxer.--
58:
769:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
606:, I have nothing to add that hasn't been said... either
326:
185:
181:
83:
Thank you, and I hope you see the light of your errors.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
779:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
662:means "bewildered, deluded". enough said :)
453:. No verification from reliable sources.
247:: This debate has been included in the
658:, or rather move to BJAODN. Sanskrit
469:Why aren't those sources reliable? --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
441:Why does everyone try so hard? --
230:Hoax is not a speedy criterion.
115:added the garbage to Charles I.
249:list of India-related deletions
1:
711:content, but please create
796:
53:18:28, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
762:20:21, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
750:00:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
738:16:31, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
693:16:27, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
676:08:51, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
651:03:28, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
640:The sources the dubious.
633:03:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
599:21:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
573:21:13, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
511:20:59, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
488:20:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
474:20:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
458:20:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
446:20:41, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
434:19:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
418:20:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
364:19:52, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
351:19:26, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
334:18:51, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
316:18:04, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
304:17:37, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
277:14:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
259:14:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
235:14:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
219:14:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
197:13:57, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
163:16:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
125:20:40, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
69:12:39, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
772:Please do not modify it.
684:BJAODNing this would be
32:Please do not modify it.
152:) 20:49, 26 July 2006.
111:created this article.
715:per Dbachmann. --Slgr
140:comment was added by
614:, take your pick. --
190:Charles I of England
267:and move to BJAODN
619:
736:
674:
617:
597:
401:
387:comment added by
302:
261:
252:
153:
104:
90:comment added by
787:
774:
722:
719:
713:Wiktionary entry
666:
631:
593:
569:
507:
414:
400:
381:
298:
292:
253:
243:
216:
178:Pope Silvester I
135:
103:
84:
34:
795:
794:
790:
789:
788:
786:
785:
784:
783:
777:deletion review
770:
717:
629:
615:
584:for now: it is
567:
505:
412:
382:
290:
214:
136:—The preceding
85:
62:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
793:
791:
782:
781:
765:
764:
752:
740:
706:
698:
697:
696:
695:
679:
678:
653:
635:
625:
601:
578:
577:
576:
575:
514:
513:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
477:
476:
461:
460:
448:
436:
423:
422:
421:
420:
403:
402:
399:) 26 July 2006
373:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
366:
354:
353:
337:
336:
319:
318:
306:
279:
262:
240:
239:
238:
237:
222:
221:
199:
170:
169:
168:
167:
166:
165:
155:
154:
128:
127:
80:
79:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
792:
780:
778:
773:
767:
766:
763:
760:
756:
753:
751:
748:
744:
741:
739:
734:
730:
726:
721:
714:
710:
707:
703:
700:
699:
694:
691:
687:
683:
682:
681:
680:
677:
673:
671:
665:
661:
657:
654:
652:
649:
648:
645:
644:
639:
636:
634:
630:
628:
622:
620:
613:
609:
605:
602:
600:
596:
592:
587:
583:
580:
579:
574:
571:
563:
559:
556:
553:
549:
545:
542:
539:
535:
531:
528:
525:
521:
518:
517:
516:
515:
512:
509:
500:
497:
496:
489:
486:
481:
480:
479:
478:
475:
472:
468:
465:
464:
463:
462:
459:
456:
452:
449:
447:
444:
440:
437:
435:
432:
428:
425:
424:
419:
416:
407:
406:
405:
404:
398:
394:
390:
386:
378:
375:
374:
365:
362:
358:
357:
356:
355:
352:
349:
345:
344:Beast and Man
341:
340:
339:
338:
335:
332:
328:
323:
322:
321:
320:
317:
314:
310:
307:
305:
301:
297:
296:
293:
288:
284:as a hoax. --
283:
280:
278:
274:
270:
266:
263:
260:
257:
250:
246:
242:
241:
236:
233:
229:
226:
225:
224:
223:
220:
217:
212:
208:
205:
204:
203:Speedy delete
200:
198:
195:
191:
187:
183:
179:
175:
172:
171:
164:
161:
157:
156:
151:
147:
143:
139:
132:
131:
130:
129:
126:
123:
118:
114:
110:
106:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
82:
81:
76:
73:
72:
71:
70:
67:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
50:Mailer Diablo
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
771:
768:
754:
742:
708:
701:
669:
659:
655:
646:
642:
637:
626:
612:unverifiable
603:
585:
581:
554:
540:
526:
498:
466:
450:
438:
426:
389:70.179.90.27
383:— Preceding
376:
343:
308:
285:
281:
264:
244:
227:
206:
202:
201:
182:on January 5
173:
116:
112:
108:
86:— Preceding
74:
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
759:HomeTOWNboy
443:Chronicidal
300:talk. o.o;;
180:by an anon
534:Trivialord
142:Pythonriot
92:Pythonriot
570:you know?
566:Just zis
548:Ben2ben90
520:Cronoyuha
508:you know?
504:Just zis
415:you know?
411:Just zis
186:this edit
733:contribs
729:messages
558:contribs
544:contribs
530:contribs
485:Fan-1967
455:Fan-1967
397:contribs
385:unsigned
361:Fan-1967
331:Fan-1967
232:Fan-1967
194:Fan-1967
150:contribs
138:unsigned
122:Fan-1967
100:contribs
88:unsigned
757:. Hoax
591:Haeleth
471:§m¡lª¢k
467:Comment
427:Comment
348:§m¡lª¢k
313:§m¡lª¢k
228:Comment
174:Comment
755:Delete
743:Delete
709:Delete
705:dupes.
702:Delete
660:mohita
656:delete
638:Delete
608:a hoax
604:Delete
586:always
582:Delete
562:WP:ANI
499:Delete
451:Delete
282:Delete
269:Tintin
265:Delete
207:Delete
46:delete
747:D-Boy
720:ndson
686:BEANS
643:Gizza
327:Bantu
59:Mohit
16:<
725:page
690:Ezeu
688:. --
618:Kinu
595:Talk
552:talk
538:talk
524:talk
439:Keep
431:Ezeu
393:talk
377:Keep
309:Keep
287:Core
273:talk
256:Ezeu
245:Note
215:Talk
160:Ezeu
146:talk
96:talk
75:Keep
66:Ezeu
664:dab
610:or
568:Guy
546:),
532:),
506:Guy
413:Guy
291:des
254:--
251:.
188:to
117:You
113:You
109:You
745:--
731:-
727:-
564:.
395:•
329:.
295:at
275:)
148:•
102:)
98:•
48:.
735:)
723:(
718:@
672:)
670:ᛏ
668:(
627:c
623:/
555:·
550:(
541:·
536:(
527:·
522:(
391:(
271:(
211:→
144:(
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.