202:
The single paper written by the subject has been cited on the order of 100 times according to Google scholar. This is significant, even given the subjects low h-score of 1, but it is not enough to build an encyclopedia article around. Mr. Kirszbraun should be mentioned in the article on
159:
286:
153:
115:
88:
83:
228:
in the polish biographical dictionary. Once I get it I will add more information. Also I believe that he published more than one paper, but it is hard to find.--
92:
75:
410:. Lots of other mathematicians have written on or expanded upon Kirszbraun's work – impact (notability) is obvious – I've added several references. Thanks,
318:- people with print encyclopedia entries about them rather by definition have significant coverage in a secondary source independent of the subject.
198:
The person's research has made significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources.
257:
the first criterion, and then I proceeded to explain how he fails that as well, as well as the general provision on the existence of sources, per
174:
141:
17:
79:
437:
419:
402:
379:
362:
342:
328:
301:
272:
248:
If an academic/professor meets ANY one of the following conditions, as substantiated through reliable sources, they are notable
237:
218:
135:
57:
428:. Circumstances of his death should be cited (perhaps the above encyc article?) or this statement should be removed. Thanks,
398:
268:
214:
131:
391:, having an entry in the Polish Biographical Dictionary establishes notability under the general notability guideline.
455:
36:
181:
71:
63:
120:
392:
262:
208:
454:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
53:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
147:
207:, but there are no sources on the subject and there will never be enough content for a separate article.
204:
433:
415:
375:
167:
49:
360:
326:
297:
225:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
243:
191:
315:
429:
411:
370:
If he's notable enough for a print encyclopedia, he's notable enough for
Knowledge (XXG).
338:
233:
371:
258:
354:
320:
314:
could produce a citation for that biographical dictionary, then this is a keep under
388:
293:
109:
334:
311:
229:
448:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
287:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
105:
101:
97:
166:
180:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
458:). No further edits should be made to this page.
261:, although that seems no longer to be an issue.
253:Oh, I don't disagree. But I said that he fails
224:There is an entry about Kirszbraun written by
8:
281:
285:: This debate has been included in the
194:, except possibly the first criterion
352:per Tosha and provision of a source.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
438:16:29, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
420:16:26, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
403:15:55, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
380:10:32, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
363:14:23, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
343:04:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
329:01:33, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
302:17:59, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
273:12:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
238:16:23, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
219:13:25, 30 October 2010 (UTC)
58:19:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)
475:
190:The subject does not pass
387:. Per conversation with
451:Please do not modify it.
72:Mojżesz David Kirszbraun
64:Mojżesz David Kirszbraun
32:Please do not modify it.
385:Nomination withdrawn
333:The job is done :)--
205:Kirszbraun's theorem
250:; so #1 is enough.
359:
325:
44:The result was
353:
319:
304:
290:
226:Edward Marczewski
466:
453:
395:
357:
323:
291:
265:
211:
185:
184:
170:
123:
113:
95:
34:
474:
473:
469:
468:
467:
465:
464:
463:
462:
456:deletion review
449:
393:
355:
321:
263:
255:except possibly
209:
127:
119:
86:
70:
67:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
472:
470:
461:
460:
444:
443:
442:
441:
405:
394:Sławomir Biały
382:
365:
347:
346:
345:
305:
278:
277:
276:
275:
264:Sławomir Biały
240:
210:Sławomir Biały
200:
199:
188:
187:
124:
121:Afd statistics
66:
61:
50:David Eppstein
48:, withdrawn. —
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
471:
459:
457:
452:
446:
445:
439:
435:
431:
427:
424:
423:
421:
417:
413:
409:
406:
404:
400:
396:
390:
386:
383:
381:
377:
373:
369:
366:
364:
361:
358:
351:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
331:
330:
327:
324:
317:
313:
309:
306:
303:
299:
295:
288:
284:
280:
279:
274:
270:
266:
260:
256:
252:
251:
249:
245:
241:
239:
235:
231:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
216:
212:
206:
197:
196:
195:
193:
183:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
133:
130:
129:Find sources:
125:
122:
117:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
68:
65:
62:
60:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
450:
447:
425:
407:
389:User:Piotrus
384:
367:
349:
307:
282:
254:
247:
201:
189:
177:
171:
163:
156:
150:
144:
138:
128:
45:
43:
31:
28:
154:free images
430:Agricola44
412:Agricola44
242:P.S. From
372:Edward321
294:• Gene93k
116:View log
308:Comment
244:WP:PROF
192:WP:PROF
160:WP refs
148:scholar
89:protect
84:history
316:WP:GNG
132:Google
93:delete
335:Tosha
312:Tosha
230:Tosha
175:JSTOR
136:books
118:) •
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
434:talk
416:talk
408:Keep
399:talk
376:talk
368:Keep
350:Keep
339:talk
298:talk
283:Note
269:talk
259:WP:V
234:talk
215:talk
168:FENS
142:news
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
54:talk
46:keep
356:Ray
322:Ray
310:If
292:--
182:TWL
114:– (
436:)
426:PS
422:.
418:)
401:)
378:)
341:)
300:)
289:.
271:)
246::
236:)
217:)
162:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
56:)
440:.
432:(
414:(
397:(
374:(
337:(
296:(
267:(
232:(
213:(
186:)
178:·
172:·
164:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
134:(
126:(
112:)
74:(
52:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.