339:— due diligence is not being done when these tools are being used in this way. "Shoot them all and let the saps at AfD sort them out," is apparently the line of thinking. While I am personally sympathetic to the idea of a very high bar for so-called "Porn Bios," this blasting of 100 articles at the rate of 1 per minute, judging from the time logs, is not conducive to the spirit or practice of AfD. It is putting
245:. Redirecting non-notable articles to Listings of a subject which has been found to be non-notable is absurd. Playmate-hood, being inherently non-notable, does not prop up this article, nor can it prop up a List of playmates. Redirecting to non-notable lists only makes work for Admins who will have to delete these redirects later.
344:
sororities. The net result of these efforts was a lot of lost time by article creators and AfD participants and a lot of lost information from those articles annihilated as part of these campaigns. Meanwhile, the backlog of crap at New Pages festers. Something needs to be done about this problem. Mine is not a unique view — see
343:
ahead of the established article deletion process and is disrespectful both to the work of article creators and those of us who volunteer our time at AfD. We have seen similar automated mass annihilation efforts recently against modern
Trotskyist political organizations and against fraternities and
191:
is not an award: It's a strategic commercial decision made by
Playboy Corporation about how to better commercialize it products. Regardless of how much some Wikipedians love Playmates, we should write articles about them only when they were covered by independent third part sources. Also, texts
220:. Does not appear to be enough nontrivial reliably sourced content to justify an independent article. This has been the outcome of most recent AFD discussions for less prominent Playmates as well the way most recently named Playmates have been handled.
149:
309:
335:- The use of automated tools for mass deletions should not be allowed against large blocks of articles which have already been patrolled at New Pages. It is, simply put, a violation of
237:
This should have been done after consensus determined
Playmate-hood's non-notability. Should sufficient sourcing and claim of notability later be found, the article can be re-started.
180:
110:
143:
286:
266:
263:
17:
217:
48:. Procedural keep because the nomination and subsequent discussion is tainted by the noms topic ban. can be immediately relisted.
83:
78:
225:
87:
164:
340:
70:
131:
439:
36:
389:
221:
348:
at ANI. We need to keep them all as a matter of principle and ban the future use of automated tools in this way.
438:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
125:
121:
424:
397:
382:
362:
324:
301:
278:
254:
229:
207:
52:
351:
This argument will be copied-and-pasted in the debate sections for all automated AfDs of this campaign.
171:
250:
157:
372:
336:
417:
358:
320:
297:
274:
74:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
345:
197:
201:
137:
246:
346:
Knowledge (XXG):ANI#Massive_number_of_Playboy-related_AFD_nominations_by_a_single_user
412:
354:
316:
293:
270:
66:
58:
49:
104:
375:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
432:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
408:
Nomination was made in violation of a still active topic ban
310:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
409:
100:
96:
92:
156:
380:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
196:are not the kind non-trivial coverage asked by the
170:
181:Being a Playboy playmate does not make you notable
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
442:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
308:Note: This debate has been included in the
285:Note: This debate has been included in the
287:list of People-related deletion discussions
307:
284:
262:Note: This debate has been added to the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
218:List of Playboy Playmates of 1989
1:
198:general notability guideline
459:
325:21:09, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
302:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
279:22:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
255:19:14, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
230:15:18, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
208:03:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
435:Please do not modify it.
425:02:57, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
192:solely related to their
53:14:08, 18 May 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
398:01:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)
363:13:41, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
264:WikiProject Pornography
222:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
185:Playmate of the Month
189:Playmate of the Year
341:WP:I DON'T LIKE IT
44:The result was
422:
400:
353:
327:
313:
304:
290:
267:list of deletions
205:
450:
437:
418:
415:
396:
394:
387:
379:
377:
349:
314:
291:
281:
203:
175:
174:
160:
108:
90:
34:
458:
457:
453:
452:
451:
449:
448:
447:
446:
440:deletion review
433:
421:
413:
406:Procedural Keep
390:
383:
381:
370:
333:Procedural Keep
261:
183:. Being chosen
117:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
456:
454:
445:
444:
428:
427:
419:
402:
401:
378:
367:
366:
365:
329:
328:
305:
282:
258:
257:
232:
178:
177:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
455:
443:
441:
436:
430:
429:
426:
423:
416:
410:
407:
404:
403:
399:
395:
393:
388:
386:
376:
374:
369:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
347:
342:
338:
334:
331:
330:
326:
322:
318:
311:
306:
303:
299:
295:
288:
283:
280:
276:
272:
268:
265:
260:
259:
256:
252:
248:
244:
242:
236:
233:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
211:
210:
209:
206:
199:
195:
190:
186:
182:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:Find sources:
115:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
434:
431:
405:
391:
384:
371:
350:
332:
240:
238:
234:
213:
194:playmatehood
193:
188:
184:
179:
167:
161:
153:
146:
140:
134:
128:
118:
67:Monique Noel
59:Monique Noel
45:
43:
31:
28:
144:free images
337:WP:BEFORE
317:• Gene93k
294:• Gene93k
271:• Gene93k
247:Dekkappai
385:Baseball
373:Relisted
243:redirect
214:Redirect
111:View log
392:Watcher
355:Carrite
202:Damiens
150:WP refs
138:scholar
84:protect
79:history
50:Spartaz
235:Delete
122:Google
88:delete
414:Monty
165:JSTOR
126:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
359:talk
321:talk
298:talk
275:talk
251:talk
226:talk
158:FENS
132:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
46:keep
420:845
315:--
241:NOT
239:Do
216:to
204:.rf
187:or
172:TWL
109:– (
411:.
361:)
323:)
312:.
300:)
289:.
277:)
269:.
253:)
228:)
200:.
152:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
357:(
319:(
296:(
292:—
273:(
249:(
224:(
176:)
168:·
162:·
154:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.