285:. About all I was able to get out of it was that it was a "project" that has something to do with measuring Internet traffic or creating standards for measuring Internet traffic. This may or may not be a worthy article subject: much would depend on who is in charge of the project, and I must admit that I wearied of its meaningless gee-whiz prose (
260:
There is a distinction between patent nonsense, and mere bad writing. The manner of writing this is not really appropriate for a
Knowledge (XXG) article, but that is fixable. It needs shorter paragraphs,and removal of sentences and parts of sentences that provide rhetoric without advancing the
159:
a project aimed at integrating different platforms for network monitoring and measurement to develop a common and open pan-European infrastructure. The system will include both passive and active monitoring and measurement techniques via a common web services interface and ontology that allows
85:
80:
89:
72:
236:
Patent nonsense includes "content that, while apparently meaningful after a fashion, is so completely and irredeemably confused that no reasonable person can be expected to make any sense of it whatsoever." Buzzword bingo counts. -
289:) well before I found the part that might tell me. The references supplied, again, seem to be about the problems allegedly addressed by this project rather than the project and its backers themselves.
296:
of this project, whatever it is, links directly to its
Knowledge (XXG) article, and the rest of the site is rather sketchy. This suggests to me that they're using Knowledge (XXG) as a
118:
334:
309:
272:
246:
231:
215:
201:
179:
140:
54:
76:
68:
60:
261:
argument or providing actual information. There is overuse of jargon, but it's reasonably standard jargon and I think used correctly.
17:
224:
It's not nonsense either. With a dictionary at your side you can decipher what it means. Patent nonsense has a specific meaning. -
125:
This page is full of marketing speak and advertising. It would need a complete rewrite to become encyclopedic. I nominated it for
349:
36:
348:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
330:
229:
213:
138:
154:
129:
speedy deletion, but Stifle declined it because the article has been around for a while. I recommend
225:
209:
134:
162:
I find it amusing that the authors claim that whatever it is they're selling here contains an
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
150:
305:
242:
197:
175:
297:
126:
282:
268:
185:
49:
106:
326:
301:
238:
193:
171:
321:. This subject may or may not deserve an article, but I am quite certain that
263:
167:
163:
281:
I suppose the other question is whether this subject, whatever it is,
189:
342:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
69:
Monitoring and
Measurement in the Next Generation Technologies
61:
Monitoring and
Measurement in the Next Generation Technologies
293:
287:
Future generation networks are heterogeneous as never before
208:
Since Stifle declined the speedy, it won't fly anyway. -
292:
I find it interesting also that what appears to be the
113:
102:
98:
94:
166:, but obviously whoever wrote that was desperately
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
352:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
192:is something very specific and useful.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
170:without saying anything specific. -
133:because it's an unsalvageable mess.
24:
1:
325:is better than this article.
184:Actually, in the context of
369:
335:10:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
310:20:04, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
273:16:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
247:11:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
232:22:32, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
216:22:30, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
202:16:16, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
180:15:09, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
168:trying to sound impressive
141:12:48, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
55:10:16, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
345:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
283:merits an article
160:semantic queries.
53:
360:
347:
116:
110:
92:
52:
34:
368:
367:
363:
362:
361:
359:
358:
357:
356:
350:deletion review
343:
302:Smerdis of Tlön
239:Smerdis of Tlön
172:Smerdis of Tlön
155:patent nonsense
112:
83:
67:
64:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
366:
364:
355:
354:
338:
337:
315:
314:
313:
312:
291:
290:
276:
275:
254:
253:
252:
251:
250:
249:
219:
218:
206:
205:
204:
123:
122:
63:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
365:
353:
351:
346:
340:
339:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
317:
316:
311:
307:
303:
299:
298:free web host
295:
294:official site
288:
284:
280:
279:
278:
277:
274:
270:
266:
265:
259:
256:
255:
248:
244:
240:
235:
234:
233:
230:
227:
223:
222:
221:
220:
217:
214:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
182:
181:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
156:
152:
148:
147:Speedy delete
145:
144:
143:
142:
139:
136:
132:
128:
120:
115:
108:
104:
100:
96:
91:
87:
82:
78:
74:
70:
66:
65:
62:
59:
57:
56:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
344:
341:
322:
318:
286:
262:
257:
186:web services
158:
151:blatant spam
146:
130:
124:
45:
43:
31:
28:
323:no article
127:WP:CSD#G11
190:ontology
164:ontology
131:deletion
119:View log
86:protect
81:history
327:Stifle
319:Delete
194:JulesH
157:: ...
114:delete
90:delete
46:delete
188:, an
117:) – (
107:views
99:watch
95:links
16:<
331:talk
306:talk
300:. -
269:talk
258:Keep
243:talk
198:talk
176:talk
153:and
103:logs
77:talk
73:edit
264:DGG
226:Mgm
210:Mgm
149:as
135:Mgm
333:)
308:)
271:)
245:)
200:)
178:)
105:|
101:|
97:|
93:|
88:|
84:|
79:|
75:|
50:BJ
48:.
329:(
304:(
267:(
241:(
228:|
212:|
196:(
174:(
137:|
121:)
111:(
109:)
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.