Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Monster Bat Incident 1771 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

138:
in 2006 and is probably a breach of copyright. Even if it does not breach copyright it should be completely rewritten in an objective and encyclopaedic style. But, as the original author seems to have left Knowledge (XXG), it is doubtful if that will happen, so probably best to just delete it.
275:
has adopted the right approach. I didn't realise the article was already on the web but I now see that the author of the Lads to Lord's site is the author of the original published article in the journal. No need to worry about copyright. I would now suggest that the article is
301:. I have expanded the new stub to capture the main points and cite the key source for the match result. I think this is now an acceptable article that should definitely be kept. The impact of the incident on the 284:
that does have some importance as it caused a change in the rules (and that ruling is still current). I'll expand it a bit to reflect that. Thanks to all above for some very useful inputs. --
123: 90: 85: 94: 252:- Copyvio not a problem now, and it is referenced, but I'm a bit worried about notability. At any rate, I'm giving the article the benefit of the doubt. -- 77: 17: 239: 189: 81: 318: 293: 263: 243: 216: 194: 165: 148: 66: 336: 36: 281: 212: 204: 174: 73: 45: 335:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
224:
re-write to stub addresses copyright violation and provides a suitable basis for writting a suitable article.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
227: 272: 208: 314: 289: 235: 144: 185: 162: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
310: 285: 258: 231: 140: 61: 302: 306: 178: 158: 111: 205:
http://www.jl.sl.btinternet.co.uk/stampsite/cricket/ladstolords/1771.html#monster
253: 56: 55:(non-admin closure), AfD withdrawn by nominator. No longer a copyvio problem. 329:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
118: 107: 103: 99: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 339:). No further edits should be made to this page. 157:as identified copyvio. Is the source online? -- 8: 280:. It relates to an incident recounted in 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 203:it by a stub with external link to 130:Apart from its markup, this is an 24: 199:Several pages link to it. I have 1: 282:1771 English cricket season 136:The Cricket Society Journal 134:of an article published in 356: 319:07:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC) 294:06:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC) 264:06:06, 16 March 2008 (UTC) 244:23:50, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 217:23:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 195:22:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 166:21:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 149:20:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC) 67:07:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC) 74:Monster Bat Incident 1771 46:Monster Bat Incident 1771 332:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 269:Comment by nominator 299:Withdraw nomination 173:as copyvio. From 273:Anthony Appleyard 246: 230:comment added by 209:Anthony Appleyard 193: 177:. So tagged. -- 347: 334: 225: 183: 121: 115: 97: 51:The result was 34: 355: 354: 350: 349: 348: 346: 345: 344: 343: 337:deletion review 330: 303:Laws of cricket 262: 117: 88: 72: 65: 49: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 353: 351: 342: 341: 324: 322: 321: 296: 278:kept as a stub 266: 256: 247: 219: 197: 168: 128: 127: 59: 48: 43: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 352: 340: 338: 333: 327: 326: 325: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 297: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 274: 270: 267: 265: 260: 255: 251: 248: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 223: 220: 218: 214: 210: 206: 202: 198: 196: 191: 187: 182: 181: 176: 172: 171:Speedy delete 169: 167: 164: 160: 156: 155:Speedy delete 153: 152: 151: 150: 146: 142: 137: 133: 125: 120: 113: 109: 105: 101: 96: 92: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 70: 69: 68: 63: 58: 54: 47: 44: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 331: 328: 323: 298: 277: 268: 249: 221: 200: 179: 170: 154: 135: 131: 129: 52: 50: 31: 28: 311:JamesJJames 286:JamesJJames 271:. I think 232:BrucePodger 226:—Preceding 141:JamesJJames 132:exact copy 250:Weak Keep 305:ensures 240:contribs 228:unsigned 201:replaced 190:Contribs 180:lifebaka 159:Dhartung 124:View log 91:protect 86:history 254:clpo13 119:delete 95:delete 57:clpo13 309:. -- 122:) – ( 112:views 104:watch 100:links 16:< 315:talk 307:WP:N 290:talk 259:talk 236:talk 222:keep 213:talk 186:Talk 175:here 163:Talk 145:talk 108:logs 82:talk 78:edit 62:talk 53:Keep 317:) 292:) 242:) 238:• 215:) 207:. 188:- 161:| 147:) 110:| 106:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 84:| 80:| 313:( 288:( 261:) 257:( 234:( 211:( 192:) 184:( 143:( 126:) 116:( 114:) 76:( 64:) 60:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Monster Bat Incident 1771
clpo13
talk
07:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Monster Bat Incident 1771
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
JamesJJames
talk
20:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
Dhartung
Talk
21:20, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
here
lifebaka
Talk
Contribs
22:24, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
http://www.jl.sl.btinternet.co.uk/stampsite/cricket/ladstolords/1771.html#monster

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.