306:
units are unique among law enforcement agencies in that, while it is a division of the
District Attorney's Office, it is the only division vested with police powers. The prosecutorial arm of the D.A.'s Office, doesn't enjoy the same authority and obviously has vastly different duties, so I thought that this unit should have it's own article as opposed to being a part of a larger article on the entire D.A.'s Office.
391:. Non-notable government office. I wouldn't even think an article on the Monroe County District Attorney's Office or Monroe County government would meet the notability criteria; the county's population is too small to justify it, and there are little or no third-party references that treat the subject in detail. Information about local and county government can be covered in the
305:
If I can chime in, I'm obviously pretty new here, so my apologies if the article doesn't fit the notable requriements. I read through the various requirements for articles, and thought that it fit. The existence of articles on other law enforcement agencies reinforced that belief. County detective
149:
180:
A division of the Monroe County
District Attorney's Office in Monroe County, Pennsylvania. It is a division of a county law enforcement agency that doesn't have an article. Law enforcement agencies are not notable by default.
411:
tooth and nail. Odds are if we delete enough of these, someone will do like with high schools and force us to include every little sub-unit of every little PD in the world - oh what fun!. Also, what
Neutrality
143:
83:
78:
327:. There is no inherent notability for every subdivision of a county office. Knowledge (XXG) is not a directory of local government units, like one sees in the front of the local phone book.
87:
70:
198:
110:
227:
164:
131:
291:
125:
421:
399:
383:
365:
336:
315:
298:
286:
268:
248:
219:
190:
52:
121:
17:
171:
74:
66:
58:
137:
436:
36:
392:
435:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
361:
239:
210:
374:
I have not changed my stance on this article. it has sufficiently shown that the subject is notable.--
311:
282:
186:
157:
346:
417:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
379:
357:
332:
264:
234:
205:
408:
324:
243:
214:
396:
307:
295:
49:
278:
182:
274:
413:
104:
375:
328:
260:
349:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
259:- I see no reason for deletion. A genuine division.. no problems.--
429:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
395:
article - Two or three sourced paragraphs would be sufficient.
273:
It is true that it is a genuine division, but it is not a
100:
96:
92:
156:
356:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
170:
199:list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
439:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
226:Note: This debate has been included in the
197:Note: This debate has been included in the
228:list of Crime-related deletion discussions
225:
196:
67:Monroe County Detectives (Pennsylvania)
59:Monroe County Detectives (Pennsylvania)
292:Knowledge (XXG):Existence ≠ Notability
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
323:Nonnotable organization, fails
1:
422:14:06, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
400:17:04, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
393:Monroe County, Pennsylvania
384:23:44, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
366:00:06, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
299:17:04, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
53:00:21, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
456:
337:19:52, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
316:18:06, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
287:15:49, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
269:11:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
249:05:06, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
220:05:06, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
191:03:39, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
432:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
368:
251:
247:
231:
222:
218:
202:
447:
434:
355:
351:
241:
232:
212:
203:
175:
174:
160:
108:
90:
34:
455:
454:
450:
449:
448:
446:
445:
444:
443:
437:deletion review
430:
344:
117:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
453:
451:
442:
441:
425:
424:
402:
386:
371:
370:
369:
353:
352:
341:
340:
339:
318:
303:
302:
301:
289:
253:
252:
223:
178:
177:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
452:
440:
438:
433:
427:
426:
423:
419:
415:
410:
406:
403:
401:
398:
394:
390:
387:
385:
381:
377:
373:
372:
367:
363:
359:
354:
350:
348:
343:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
319:
317:
313:
309:
304:
300:
297:
293:
290:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
271:
270:
266:
262:
258:
255:
254:
250:
245:
242:(note: not a
240:
238:
237:
229:
224:
221:
216:
213:(note: not a
211:
209:
208:
200:
195:
194:
193:
192:
188:
184:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:Find sources:
115:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
63:
60:
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
431:
428:
404:
388:
345:
320:
256:
236:I, Jethrobot
235:
207:I, Jethrobot
206:
179:
167:
161:
153:
146:
140:
134:
128:
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
358:Ron Ritzman
144:free images
397:Neutrality
308:Bravo27835
296:Neutrality
277:division.
50:Courcelles
407:- Defend
279:Joe Chill
183:Joe Chill
414:Cerejota
347:Relisted
111:View log
412:said.--
275:notable
150:WP refs
138:scholar
84:protect
79:history
409:WP:GNG
405:Delete
389:Delete
376:BabbaQ
329:Edison
325:WP:ORG
321:Delete
261:BabbaQ
122:Google
88:delete
46:delete
165:JSTOR
126:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
418:talk
380:talk
362:talk
333:talk
312:talk
283:talk
265:talk
257:Keep
187:talk
158:FENS
132:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
244:bot
215:bot
172:TWL
109:– (
420:)
382:)
364:)
335:)
314:)
294:.
285:)
267:)
246:!)
233:—
230:.
217:!)
204:—
201:.
189:)
152:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
48:.
416:(
378:(
360:(
331:(
310:(
281:(
263:(
185:(
176:)
168:·
162:·
154:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.