483:. Having reviewed Cavarrone's supposed listing of "reliable sources that are independent of the subject" that give Fishburne "significant coverage", I see a series of fails. The USA Today piece is a one-liner. Twelve words. That's not significant coverage. The Huffington Post's series of "NSFW photos", "went all-out" and "nearly nude" is not what we call a reliable source. Likewise a publication phrasing itself "The barely legal star said". And the People source is a barely warmed-over version of that same publicity-seeking press release. Thin stuff. More than thin. --
646:. Coverage satisfying the GNG, persisting through the current day. Please note the update I just added to the article. Please note the expansion I just added to the article, noting that Ms Fishburne has become a prominent example of the erotica industry's failure to deliver the benefits so often touted in the initial bursts of its publicity.
628:
So famous actor has an embarrassing child. Guess what you have all been an embarrassment to you've parents at one point or other in your lives. That doesn't meant that you are worthy of an article in an 'encyclopedia', maybe a paragraph in a gossip column, or the subject of talk by parents outside
513:
source is far from being a press release, it is sufficent you read "Montana
Fishburne, 18, tells PEOPLE..."; yes, it was reprised by many other sources, maybe some parts were later used in a press release (I have no idea which PR you refer), but that's quite different. And the
610:
per GiantSnowman. The subject is not notable, she's merely notorious. There is no reliable material with which to create a bio that isn't almost completely negative and isn't sourced exclusively to tabloids. She merits a paragraph in her father's bio, nothing more.
83:
333:
I've restored the article to the state just before the nomination. Effectively blanking the article before nominating it for deletion is not appropriate; !voters should be able to assess the quality of sources for themselves.
190:
88:
348:
I see where you’re coming from, but restoring the article to its previous state does not address the issues. The sources are still sub-standard. How about trying to rewrite this article with actual sources?
270:
290:
541:
demands "significant coverage" in reliable sources that addresses the topic directly and in detail – there simply isn't enough here in quantity or quality to write an encyclopedic biography.
663:- Passes the GNG with multiple reliable sources about her. Does not fall under BLP1E since coverage goes beyond one event (sex tape). Coverage persisted years after the video
143:
184:
78:
506:
150:
250:
448:
appears to be quite disruptive. The subject easily passes GNG: outside of sources already included in the article, more stuff is available online, eg.
366:
593:
from a famous relative. None of the blogs and TMZ-style stuff would give a minor porn actress a shred of coverage if it wasn't for her father.
428:
383:
116:
111:
120:
370:
672:
655:
638:
620:
602:
581:
555:
525:
518:
article is so patently reliable you ignored it in your above analysis. The same with sources by Taylor
Trescott, you ignored as well.
492:
475:
432:
407:
387:
353:
343:
325:
302:
282:
262:
238:
225:
103:
61:
247:
205:
651:
17:
172:
551:
457:
629:
the school gates, or maybe even a mention in court report, but an encyclopedia entry nope. So kill it as per Tarky above.
647:
465:
166:
691:
40:
668:
368:
162:
634:
235:
590:
578:
488:
107:
212:
687:
404:
350:
222:
57:
36:
419:
374:
321:
664:
198:
630:
614:
562:
546:
178:
575:
484:
412:
Unencyclopedic =/= unreliable. But, after mulling over it for a while, I think I'll go with a
298:
278:
258:
99:
67:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
686:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
449:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
567:
53:
461:
315:
598:
519:
469:
453:
571:
542:
538:
339:
294:
274:
254:
137:
314:
before being pruned considerably by the nominator in case anybody wants context.
84:
Articles for deletion/Montana
Fishburne: An A-List Daughter Makes her XXX Debut
594:
335:
505:
twelve words, probably you just read the summary, it is sufficent you
680:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
509:. I concede you Huffington Post's articles are quite gossipy.
271:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
403:
are now considered encyclopedic sources? Please try harder.
291:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
501:
As I have been called into question... the USA Today is
89:
Articles for deletion/Montana
Fishburne (2nd nomination)
445:
311:
133:
129:
125:
197:
416:as everyone else seems to have some better points.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
694:). No further edits should be made to this page.
566:- no career or coverage of note, so fails both
211:
8:
289:Note: This debate has been included in the
269:Note: This debate has been included in the
288:
268:
246:Note: This debate has been added to the
79:Articles for deletion/Montana Fishburne
76:
221:Non-notable, no encyclopedic sources.
7:
74:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
310:Note: The article looked like
1:
365:Quite a bit of RS available.
673:23:40, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
656:18:08, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
639:16:42, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
621:02:36, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
603:16:59, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
582:16:35, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
556:03:34, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
526:06:44, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
493:22:10, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
476:19:59, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
433:18:14, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
408:17:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
388:18:54, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
354:17:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
344:15:46, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
326:18:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
303:16:39, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
283:16:39, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
263:16:39, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
239:12:26, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
226:22:47, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
62:00:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
591:Notability is not inherited
711:
683:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
248:WikiProject Pornography
73:AfDs for this article:
648:Hullaballoo Wolfowitz
397:hollywoodreporter.com
393:accesshollywood.com
563:Laurence Fishburne
537:per Demiurge1000.
234:per nominator. --
48:The result was
554:
324:
305:
285:
251:list of deletions
100:Montana Fishburne
68:Montana Fishburne
702:
685:
619:
617:
549:
545:
422:
377:
320:
318:
265:
236:Hillbillyholiday
216:
215:
201:
153:
141:
123:
34:
710:
709:
705:
704:
703:
701:
700:
699:
698:
692:deletion review
681:
615:
612:
547:
458:The Daily Beast
454:Huffington Post
431:
421:Taylor Trescott
420:
386:
376:Taylor Trescott
375:
316:
245:
158:
149:
114:
98:
95:
93:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
708:
706:
697:
696:
676:
675:
665:Morbidthoughts
658:
641:
623:
605:
584:
558:
531:
530:
529:
528:
507:click the link
496:
495:
478:
439:
438:
437:
436:
435:
427:
382:
358:
357:
356:
328:
307:
306:
286:
266:
242:
241:
219:
218:
155:
94:
92:
91:
86:
81:
75:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
707:
695:
693:
689:
684:
678:
677:
674:
670:
666:
662:
659:
657:
653:
649:
645:
642:
640:
636:
632:
631:John lilburne
627:
624:
622:
618:
616:FreeRangeFrog
609:
606:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
585:
583:
580:
577:
573:
569:
565:
564:
559:
557:
553:
550:
544:
540:
536:
533:
532:
527:
524:
522:
517:
512:
508:
504:
500:
499:
498:
497:
494:
490:
486:
482:
479:
477:
474:
472:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
440:
434:
430:
425:
424:
423:
415:
411:
410:
409:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
390:
389:
385:
380:
379:
378:
371:
369:
367:
364:
363:
359:
355:
352:
347:
346:
345:
341:
337:
332:
329:
327:
323:
319:
313:
309:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
287:
284:
280:
276:
272:
267:
264:
260:
256:
252:
249:
244:
243:
240:
237:
233:
230:
229:
228:
227:
224:
214:
210:
207:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
164:
161:
160:Find sources:
156:
152:
148:
145:
139:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
113:
109:
105:
101:
97:
96:
90:
87:
85:
82:
80:
77:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
682:
679:
660:
643:
625:
607:
586:
561:Redirect to
560:
534:
520:
515:
510:
502:
485:Demiurge1000
480:
470:
441:
418:
417:
413:
400:
396:
392:
373:
372:
361:
360:
330:
231:
220:
208:
202:
194:
187:
181:
175:
169:
159:
146:
49:
47:
31:
28:
401:eonline.com
185:free images
54:Mark Arsten
317:Beerest355
688:talk page
568:WP:NACTOR
450:USA Today
295:• Gene93k
275:• Gene93k
255:• Gene93k
37:talk page
690:or in a
608:Redirect
523:avarrone
516:ABC News
473:avarrone
466:ABC News
429:my edits
414:redirect
384:my edits
144:View log
39:or in a
579:Snowman
543:Andreas
331:Comment
191:WP refs
179:scholar
117:protect
112:history
626:Delete
587:Delete
572:WP:GNG
539:WP:GNG
535:Delete
511:People
481:Delete
462:People
399:, and
232:Delete
163:Google
121:delete
50:delete
576:Giant
426:- +
405:Draco
381:- +
351:Draco
223:Draco
206:JSTOR
167:books
151:Stats
138:views
130:watch
126:links
16:<
669:talk
661:Keep
652:talk
644:Keep
635:talk
599:talk
595:Tarc
570:and
489:talk
446:this
442:Keep
362:Keep
340:talk
322:Talk
312:this
299:talk
279:talk
259:talk
199:FENS
173:news
134:logs
108:talk
104:edit
58:talk
552:466
503:not
336:Hqb
213:TWL
142:– (
671:)
654:)
637:)
601:)
589:-
574:.
548:JN
491:)
468:.
464:,
460:,
456:,
452:,
444:,
395:,
342:)
301:)
293:.
281:)
273:.
261:)
253:.
193:)
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
119:|
115:|
110:|
106:|
60:)
52:.
667:(
650:(
633:(
613:§
597:(
521:C
487:(
471:C
338:(
297:(
277:(
257:(
217:)
209:·
203:·
195:·
188:·
182:·
176:·
170:·
165:(
157:(
154:)
147:·
140:)
102:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.