380:
an encyclopedia. If we can get rid of
Visible penis line and moose knuckle, I'd be happy to re-nominate cameltoe, in the hopes of getting away from these dictionary definitions and back on track. Same goes for handbra. On the other hand, trying to delete dictionary definitions of slang terms could easily turn into a full time job, considering how many editors like writing dictionary definitions. Why don't they just go to Wiktionary and define slang terms to their heart's content? --
420:
papers about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term. An editor's personal observations and research (e.g. finding blogs, books, and articles that use the term rather than are about the term) are insufficient to support articles on neologisms because this may require analysis and synthesis of primary source material to advance a position, which is explicitly prohibited by the original research policy.
413:, although I don't know what that might be). The difference between an encylopedia and a mere lexicon is depth of coverage and grouping overlapping entries, I beleive, would help in this regard, if an appropriately descriptive term could be formed for it. (On this note, note the last graf at the guideline on neologisms):
379:
soley because it's a widely used word, with mention in some mainstream newspapers. Nobody cited any sources that provided any encyclopedic content other than the definition. Misguided deletion decisions like that make me wonder if they don't just need to decide that
Knowledge is both a dictionary and
428:
In a few cases, there will be notable topics which are well-documented in reliable sources, but for which no accepted short-hand term exists. It can be tempting to employ a neologism in such a case. Instead, it is preferable to use a title that is a descriptive phrase in plain
English if possible,
419:
Some neologisms can be in frequent use, and it may be possible to pull together many facts about a particular term and show evidence of its usage on the
Internet or in larger society. To support an article about a particular term or concept we must cite reliable secondary sources such as books and
423:
Neologisms that are in wide use but for which there are no treatments in secondary sources are not yet ready for use and coverage in
Knowledge. The term does not need to be in Knowledge in order to be a "true" term, and when secondary sources become available, it will be appropriate to create an
552:
The WIktionary entry seems to do an adequate job, obviating the need for this stub. Got to spin a better yarn if this is to be kept. So far, it's just a few trivial mentions of this neologism. Failing deletion, we might find references to Kirk
Douglas' chin before long.
664:. I am pretty sure this must be a notable topic with significant coverage including technical information for fashion designers. I just don't know how and where to look for it. As a first measure this article should probably be merged with
149:
302:
successfully addressed the scope of an encylopedia entry versus that of a dictionary article for a term of dress. Google books sources? check. Scholarly sources? Ditto. News sources? Umm-humn.--
232:
487:
The question is what sources are available, not how many are currently cited. There are many sources available. (In any case, the ones included are not all self-published, per your claim).--
442:
366:
327:
311:
350:
587:
496:
453:
189:
48:. Keep arguments haven't effectively refuted the essential deletion argument that there aren't the sources to expand this beyonga dicdef and its already covered in wikt
143:
110:
583:
492:
438:
362:
353:, applied solely to photography of BBW's or to homoeroticism be more likely to pass or fail at a AfD, given the editors' predominantly heterosexual-male
323:
307:
299:
389:
337:- Howev, w/concern this term's--"negative," I guess one could say? --connotation/tone: Don't know if deletion would really be tantamount to a net
579:
488:
434:
358:
319:
303:
469:
83:
78:
87:
599:
Its obvious from even the discussion above there is sufficient material and references to write more than just a definition.
17:
70:
164:
131:
533:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Popular_Culture#Knowledge:Articles_for_deletion.2FMoose_knuckle
690:
632:
385:
197:
36:
689:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
125:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
346:
648:. The topic is probably legitimate and notable once it has been widened a bit to include phenomena such as
675:
636:
610:
561:
543:
527:
478:
288:
271:
247:
223:
201:
121:
52:
665:
559:
463:
532:
672:
669:
628:
518:, as well as a mixed drink recipe, making it kind of hard to claim this is just a dictionary entry.
507:
381:
284:
193:
171:
157:
74:
624:
623:
the term. Not just proof that the term is being used. That only proves existence. See, again,
211:
181:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
657:
554:
539:
523:
458:
267:
243:
219:
137:
514:
280:
354:
185:
606:
402:
66:
58:
49:
104:
578:"--the topic of, um, "Mooseknuckle" just doesn't inspire that much passion---.--
535:
519:
263:
239:
215:
619:
Please cite this material specifically. We need to see encyclopedic content
410:
259:
258:
200,000 plus google hits including news outlets. For sexist equality, see
661:
649:
601:
575:
406:
376:
180:
Dictionary definition of a neologism. Knowledge is not a dictionary. see
571:
653:
349:. Still, it's interesting to speculate: would an AfD for a term like
683:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
555:
424:
article on the topic, or use the term within other articles.
570:
Geez, Ohconfucius, what can we do? I'm afraid that unlike "
233:
list of
Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions
429:
even if this makes for a somewhat long or awkward title.
100:
96:
92:
156:
454:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Visible penis line
190:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Visible penis line
452:with exactly the same reasoning as my comment at
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
693:). No further edits should be made to this page.
170:
8:
231:Note: This debate has been included in the
409:or a catch-all that would include somehow
230:
345:toward achieving the goals of, say, the
7:
504:As for published sources, we've got
24:
580:Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden
489:Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden
435:Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden
359:Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden
320:Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden
304:Hodgson-Burnett's Secret Garden
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
210:. This is the definition of a
1:
401:(a re-!vote, from above; per
710:
676:17:03, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
637:19:07, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
611:16:56, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
588:16:21, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
562:14:19, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
318:See my new !vote below.--
53:17:17, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
686:Please do not modify it.
544:23:45, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
528:21:57, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
497:19:41, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
479:07:32, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
443:23:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
390:23:14, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
367:23:01, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
328:23:23, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
312:22:55, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
289:22:40, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
279:. Per nom and Tedder.--
272:22:37, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
248:22:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
224:22:27, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
202:22:11, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
347:fat acceptance movement
432:
414:
375:It appears they kept
212:dictionary definition
656:, and possibly also
666:visible penis line
300:AfD for "Cameltoe"
44:The result was
250:
236:
701:
688:
658:tanga (clothing)
557:
477:
474:
473:
466:
461:
399:Delete and merge
237:
175:
174:
160:
108:
90:
34:
709:
708:
704:
703:
702:
700:
699:
698:
697:
691:deletion review
684:
629:Dennis Bratland
515:Chuck Palahniuk
471:
470:
464:
459:
456:
382:Dennis Bratland
194:Dennis Bratland
117:
81:
65:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
707:
705:
696:
695:
679:
678:
642:
641:
640:
639:
614:
613:
593:
592:
591:
590:
565:
564:
502:
501:
500:
499:
482:
481:
472:Tellers' wands
446:
445:
395:
394:
393:
392:
370:
369:
331:
330:
315:
314:
291:
274:
252:
251:
227:
226:
186:has it covered
178:
177:
114:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
706:
694:
692:
687:
681:
680:
677:
674:
671:
667:
663:
659:
655:
651:
647:
644:
643:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
617:
616:
615:
612:
608:
604:
603:
598:
595:
594:
589:
585:
581:
577:
573:
569:
568:
567:
566:
563:
560:
558:
551:
548:
547:
546:
545:
541:
537:
534:
530:
529:
525:
521:
517:
516:
511:
510:
509:
498:
494:
490:
486:
485:
484:
483:
480:
475:
467:
462:
455:
451:
450:Strong delete
448:
447:
444:
440:
436:
431:
430:
425:
421:
417:
412:
408:
404:
400:
397:
396:
391:
387:
383:
378:
374:
373:
372:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
333:
332:
329:
325:
321:
317:
316:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
292:
290:
286:
282:
278:
275:
273:
269:
265:
261:
257:
254:
253:
249:
245:
241:
234:
229:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:; Wiktionary
183:
173:
169:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
133:
130:
127:
123:
120:
119:Find sources:
115:
112:
106:
102:
98:
94:
89:
85:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:Moose knuckle
64:
63:
60:
59:Moose knuckle
57:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
685:
682:
645:
620:
600:
596:
574:"--or even "
549:
531:
513:
506:
505:
503:
449:
427:
426:
422:
418:
416:... ... ...
415:
398:
342:
338:
334:
294:
293:
276:
255:
207:
179:
167:
161:
153:
146:
140:
134:
128:
118:
45:
43:
31:
28:
556:Ohconfucius
508:Vanity Fair
188:. See also
144:free images
625:WP:NOTDICT
281:Epeefleche
182:WP:NOTDICT
411:camel toe
355:wp:BIASes
260:camel toe
662:cameltoe
650:codpiece
576:Cameltoe
460:Treasury
407:cameltoe
377:Cameltoe
111:View log
646:Comment
572:Handbra
405:) with
351:handbra
339:victory
335:comment
150:WP refs
138:scholar
84:protect
79:history
50:Spartaz
654:koteka
550:Delete
536:μηδείς
520:μηδείς
403:wp:NEO
343:defeat
277:Delete
264:μηδείς
240:tedder
216:tedder
208:Delete
122:Google
88:delete
46:delete
673:Adler
621:about
607:talk
295:keep
165:JSTOR
126:books
105:views
97:watch
93:links
16:<
670:Hans
660:and
633:talk
627:. --
597:Keep
584:talk
540:talk
524:talk
512:and
493:talk
439:talk
386:talk
363:talk
324:talk
308:talk
285:talk
268:talk
256:Keep
244:talk
220:talk
198:talk
158:FENS
132:news
101:logs
75:talk
71:edit
602:DGG
465:Tag
357:?--
341:or
172:TWL
109:– (
668:.
652:,
635:)
609:)
586:)
542:)
526:)
495:)
476:─╢
457:╟─
441:)
433:--
388:)
365:)
326:)
310:)
298:-
287:)
270:)
262:.
246:)
238:—
235:.
222:)
214:.
200:)
192:.
152:)
103:|
99:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
77:|
73:|
631:(
605:(
582:(
538:(
522:(
491:(
468:►
437:(
384:(
361:(
322:(
306:(
283:(
266:(
242:(
218:(
196:(
176:)
168:·
162:·
154:·
147:·
141:·
135:·
129:·
124:(
116:(
113:)
107:)
69:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.