398:
do not care. It just pains me that
Knowledge adopts an hypocritical ideology in handling issues. One thing I've noticed in my 7 years of creating articles here is that Knowledge always fake a concern that women and African topics are lacking in coverage and more editors are needed in these areas yet they delete articles in these areas that actually contain REFERENCES at the slightest opportunities. The irony of this is that there is a general understanding among the deletionist camp that coverage in these areas are not as prevalent as others.
475:
coverage." The fact of the matter is that
Knowledge welcomes contributions from everyone. If this wasn't the case, newcomers wouldn't be able to create a page by simply adding double brackets around the page's title. If Knowledge was more stringent, new articles would only be created via AFC. One being a popular OAP doesn't mean that they deserve to have stand-alone articles written about them. I just want you to keep this in mind.
397:
It's not my job to convince you, I didn't create the article, I'm on
Knowledge to add content on Nigerian topics, not to socialize, make friends or please anyone by !voting delete abruptly. If Knowledge still thinks this article should be deleted despite the references I added then so be it, I really
417:
And I can only lol at your comment that implied that multiple non-promotional independent interviews in reliable sources doesn't amount to significant coverage. If not for the more specific guidelines we have for sportpeople, entertainers, politicians, etc. there wouldn't be any
Nigerian article on
407:
I've lived in Lagos for most of my life and I listen to radio quite often. I know the impact Matse had during her time at
Wazobia FM above her contemporaries in other frequencies. When you delete the most popular OAP (with references) of a nation (Yes Lagos is the media capital of Nigeria) on some
371:
There is some minor coverage. From the current sources in the article there are several paragraphs about her. The rest are interviews with her non-independent comments about herself or brief mentions. There are some notable awards listed although I'm not certain if any would be considered 'well
474:
supports the notion that articles on
Knowledge can be nominated for deletion at any point in time. AFD exists in order for the community to derive consensus about the notability of a topic. I disagree with your point about Knowledge faking "a concern that women and African topics are lacking in
469:
You get very emotional when responding to others. You need to stop making comments about AFD participants. Please comment on content, not on the contributor. Some of the comments you made above are conflicting to say the least. If you do not care about the outcome of this AFD discussion, why
496:. Initially I was heading for a keep; while broadcasters/presenters are rarely notable, this subject had multiple awards listed. On further look, the awards themselves appear small or very recent in inception. Therefore, it doesn't really support her notability.
418:
Knowledge based on that statement. Sorry to say, but to me you sound quite uninformed and lacking in recognition that Africa is essentially different from Europe and the West. Better I stop here so I wouldn't be accused of not adhering to AFD etiquette.
408:
illogical grounds then there is certainly a problem somewhere. You are inadvertently implying that you don't want any female OAP from
Nigeria, a nation that actually still listens to radio, having articles on Knowledge.
166:
535:: I just don't see enough here to meet notability criteria. Yes, there's some awards, but they are not notable awards, and the awards must be notable to help confer notability on an article subject.
160:
218:
119:
238:
438:
303:
350:
362:
332:: notable OAP. One of the best in her field nationally. Article needs work, but she's clearly notable. Use Google as i just did, if you need sources.
285:
Please sir, can you take a second look at the article and reconsider your earlier assertion that there isn't a major claim of notability?
126:
92:
87:
96:
17:
181:
79:
148:
358:
354:
563:
372:
known'. Most are unsourced claims. Of the four sources listed by Darreg one is a dead link for me (takes me to
40:
142:
314:
138:
559:
544:
523:
505:
488:
486:
450:
427:
388:
341:
321:
294:
276:
250:
230:
210:
61:
36:
273:
201:, ran a search on her and couldn't find anything notable- except her been fired by a radio station!
188:
242:
222:
202:
174:
246:
226:
206:
375:) and the others are again interviews of the subject which are not helpful to notability. Fails
446:
384:
309:
83:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
558:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
540:
519:
501:
476:
423:
376:
337:
290:
57:
471:
266:
154:
265:
reads like a resumé, very promotional without any sort of major claim of notability.
262:
198:
442:
380:
75:
67:
113:
536:
515:
497:
464:
419:
333:
286:
53:
552:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
349:: On a second thought, let me add some references here.
373:
109:
105:
101:
173:
514:
Interesting. I love the direction this AFD is going.
379:. Happy to reconsider if better sources surface.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
566:). No further edits should be made to this page.
470:participate in it? You are overreacting Darreg.
187:
8:
437:Note: This debate has been included in the
302:Note: This debate has been included in the
237:Note: This debate has been included in the
219:list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions
217:Note: This debate has been included in the
239:list of People-related deletion discussions
439:list of Radio-related deletion discussions
436:
304:list of Women-related deletion discussions
301:
236:
216:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
583:
555:Please do not modify it.
545:20:05, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
524:18:26, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
506:16:23, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
62:00:41, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
489:23:36, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
451:01:06, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
428:13:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
389:17:04, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
342:06:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
322:20:54, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
295:13:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
277:20:25, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
251:20:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
231:20:11, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
211:19:56, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
274:User talk:Comatmebro
453:
324:
253:
233:
574:
557:
484:
468:
319:
317:
312:
271:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
34:
582:
581:
577:
576:
575:
573:
572:
571:
570:
564:deletion review
553:
477:
462:
315:
310:
308:
267:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
580:
578:
569:
568:
548:
547:
529:
528:
527:
526:
509:
508:
491:
455:
454:
433:
432:
431:
430:
412:
411:
410:
409:
402:
401:
400:
399:
392:
391:
366:
344:
326:
325:
299:
298:
297:
280:
279:
255:
254:
234:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
579:
567:
565:
561:
556:
550:
549:
546:
542:
538:
534:
531:
530:
525:
521:
517:
513:
512:
511:
510:
507:
503:
499:
495:
492:
490:
487:
485:
483:
482:
473:
466:
460:
457:
456:
452:
448:
444:
440:
435:
434:
429:
425:
421:
416:
415:
414:
413:
406:
405:
404:
403:
396:
395:
394:
393:
390:
386:
382:
378:
374:
370:
367:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
343:
339:
335:
331:
328:
327:
323:
320:
318:
313:
305:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
283:
282:
281:
278:
275:
272:
270:
264:
260:
257:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
235:
232:
228:
224:
220:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
554:
551:
532:
493:
480:
478:
458:
368:
346:
329:
311:CAPTAIN RAJU
307:
268:
258:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
76:Matse Uwatse
68:Matse Uwatse
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
269:Comatmebro
560:talk page
443:• Gene93k
377:WP:ANYBIO
37:talk page
562:or in a
472:WP:NTEMP
243:ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ
223:ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ
203:ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ
120:View log
39:or in a
479:Versace
459:Comment
381:Gab4gab
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
537:Waggie
533:Delete
516:Darreg
498:Ifnord
494:Delete
465:Darreg
420:Darreg
369:Delete
347:Update
334:Darreg
287:Darreg
263:WP:BIO
259:Delete
199:WP:GNG
197:Fails
139:Google
97:delete
54:Kurykh
50:delete
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
541:talk
520:talk
502:talk
481:1608
447:talk
424:talk
385:talk
361:and
338:talk
330:Keep
291:talk
261:Per
247:talk
227:talk
207:talk
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
316:(✉)
189:TWL
118:– (
52:.
543:)
522:)
504:)
461:.
449:)
441:.
426:)
387:)
357:,
353:,
340:)
306:.
293:)
249:)
241:.
229:)
221:.
209:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
539:(
518:(
500:(
467::
463:@
445:(
422:(
383:(
365:.
363:4
359:3
355:2
351:1
336:(
289:(
245:(
225:(
205:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.