233:- If you had actually bothered to check the sources before nominating, you'd see that there's third party references instead of entirely first party references. My theory is this man has pissed you off somehow and you're here to kill his article. --
411:
This might be the case but i dont see it listed in the sources anywhere. As mentioned only a local paper, 1 source from reuters and some dead links. There is no update of productions since 2008 either. Again nothing that shows anything supporting
483:
Searching Google News
Archive found the following sources covering him and his work. I haven't been able to find anymore, so I'm not inclined to firmly support keeping this article, but there might be more reliable sources out
308:
Sorry new around here not sure I did this correctly but which sources were not first party? I only saw dead links that didnt seem notable in the first place, 1st party and a small local newspaper. Certainly nothing in
179:
355:
378:
There's an entire article about him on
Reuters Canada, so he meets notability. The entry needs to be updated and cleaned up, though, and the dead links need to be replaced with live ones.
281:
132:
173:
335:
139:
105:
100:
109:
17:
92:
68:
194:
294:
161:
53:
465:
526:
263:
244:
40:
155:
503:
420:
401:
383:
322:
219:
507:
471:
430:
405:
387:
367:
347:
326:
298:
267:
223:
151:
74:
522:
96:
36:
496:
426:
201:
413:
310:
187:
88:
80:
499:
416:
397:
379:
318:
277:
215:
63:
363:
343:
290:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
521:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
441:
167:
460:
314:
260:
241:
211:
58:
359:
339:
285:
126:
444:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
453:
491:
254:
235:
497:
http://gigaom.com/2009/07/06/your-geek-news-gets-nerdy-for-babelgum/
396:
Is an important in his region, has a large number of productions.
515:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
356:
list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions
122:
118:
114:
186:
451:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
276:
This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (
282:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 April 20
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
529:). No further edits should be made to this page.
200:
8:
354:Note: This debate has been included in the
336:list of Ontario-related deletion discussions
334:Note: This debate has been included in the
353:
333:
492:http://www.mississauga.com/article/19238
7:
214:. All sources are direct from user.
317:in my opinion from either though.
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
280:). I have transcluded it to
546:
472:08:21, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
431:05:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
406:16:10, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
388:22:12, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
368:18:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
348:18:13, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
327:16:35, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
299:16:12, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
268:16:38, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
248:16:04, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
224:15:57, 20 April 2013 (UTC)
518:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
508:21:20, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
75:07:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
210:Not notable. Fails
274:Automated comment:
48:The result was
474:
370:
350:
301:
54:non-admin closure
537:
520:
470:
468:
463:
458:
450:
446:
433:
288:
272:
266:
257:
247:
238:
205:
204:
190:
142:
130:
112:
73:
71:
66:
61:
34:
545:
544:
540:
539:
538:
536:
535:
534:
533:
527:deletion review
516:
466:
461:
454:
452:
439:
424:
286:
259:
253:
249:
240:
234:
147:
138:
103:
87:
84:
69:
64:
59:
57:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
543:
541:
532:
531:
512:
511:
510:
494:
486:
485:
477:
476:
475:
448:
447:
436:
435:
434:
429:comment added
391:
390:
372:
371:
351:
331:
330:
329:
303:
302:
270:
229:
208:
207:
144:
83:
78:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
542:
530:
528:
524:
519:
513:
509:
505:
501:
500:Transcendence
498:
495:
493:
490:
489:
488:
487:
482:
479:
478:
473:
469:
464:
459:
457:
449:
445:
443:
438:
437:
432:
428:
422:
418:
417:Fivestarfluff
415:
410:
409:
408:
407:
403:
399:
398:Spoonkymonkey
395:
389:
385:
381:
380:HillbillyGoat
377:
374:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
352:
349:
345:
341:
337:
332:
328:
324:
320:
319:Fivestarfluff
316:
312:
307:
306:
305:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
283:
279:
275:
271:
269:
265:
262:
256:
252:
246:
243:
237:
232:
228:
227:
226:
225:
221:
217:
216:Fivestarfluff
213:
203:
199:
196:
193:
189:
185:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
157:
153:
150:
149:Find sources:
145:
141:
137:
134:
128:
124:
120:
116:
111:
107:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:Matt Campagna
86:
85:
82:
81:Matt Campagna
79:
77:
76:
72:
67:
62:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
517:
514:
480:
455:
440:
414:WP:FILMMAKER
393:
392:
375:
311:WP:FILMMAKER
273:
250:
230:
209:
197:
191:
183:
176:
170:
164:
158:
148:
135:
49:
47:
31:
28:
425:—Preceding
394:Strong keep
231:Speedy keep
174:free images
523:talk page
481:Weak Keep
360:• Gene93k
340:• Gene93k
251:Withdrawn
37:talk page
525:or in a
442:Relisted
133:View log
39:or in a
427:undated
287:Snotbot
180:WP refs
168:scholar
106:protect
101:history
484:there.
315:WP:BIO
278:step 3
212:WP:BIO
152:Google
110:delete
195:JSTOR
156:books
140:Stats
127:views
119:watch
115:links
16:<
504:talk
456:czar
421:talk
402:talk
384:talk
376:Keep
364:talk
344:talk
323:talk
220:talk
188:FENS
162:news
123:logs
97:talk
93:edit
50:keep
423:)
313:or
297:»
284:.
255:GSK
236:GSK
202:TWL
131:– (
70:eef
60:Dea
52:. (
506:)
404:)
386:)
366:)
358:.
346:)
338:.
325:)
293:•
258:●
239:●
222:)
182:)
125:|
121:|
117:|
113:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
65:db
56:)
502:(
467:·
462:·
419:(
400:(
382:(
362:(
342:(
321:(
295:c
291:t
264:✓
261:✉
245:✓
242:✉
218:(
206:)
198:·
192:·
184:·
177:·
171:·
165:·
159:·
154:(
146:(
143:)
136:·
129:)
91:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.