499:
296:, for which thanks. He hasn't won yet and the standard is fairly clear. "he general rule is to redirect to an appropriate page covering the election or political office sought in lieu of deletion." I looked for media coverage outside Pennsylvania and found little or nothing relevant; thus far, he's of state-level interest only. As always, there is no prejudice to recreating this if and when he becomes
465:
supports
Cartwright's notability. Defeating a 20-year incumbent and being a major party nominee in a Congressional election qualifies him as a "major local political figure." Regardless, criterion #3 says, failing that, "such people can still be notable if they meet the primary notability criterion."
615:
I consider being a candidate for a national office of one of the two main parties in a two -party system a major accomplishment. We have not always kept these, when the sources were borderline, as is often the case, but here's an instance when there are clearly enough sources. Whether you go by
52:. Clearly the consensus is against an outright deletion, although the call for a redirect to the election has some merit. On the other hand, there seems to be a clear majority who feel that the coverage is sufficient for a full biography, even before the election.
366:: "Major figures in national or first-level sub-national political races." A major party nominee for congressional office qualifies. The article should be kept as Matthew Cartwright is notable as he is expected to become the new Democratic Congressman for the
164:
382:
in the
Democratic primary by 57%-43%. So since most newspapers and politicians are saying that he is going to be elected I therefore strongly believe that this article on Matthew Cartwright should be both kept and he is
264:
550:
has not held notable elected office and is merely a candidate. Multiple independent sources are nothing if they don't include significant coverage, and those given above only cover the primary election.
158:
92:
87:
404:; mine doesn't say that. In fact, it says pretty much the opposite: "Just being … an unelected candidate for political office does not guarantee notability …". Best of luck with your election.
415:
Its not my election as i'm not an american nor am I standing for elected office, but Matt
Cartwright is expected to win this congressional seat so i fail to see why he does count for notability.
96:
79:
670:- Major party candidate (and nominee) in a U.S. federal election. Even if he doesn't win, and all polls say he will in November, he defeated a 10-term U.S. Rep. in the primary election.
371:
568:. I think the breadth of coverage (much of it highlighted by Gobonobo, above) speaks to notability here. Being likely to be elected is not itself a source of notability - see
216:
238:
124:
576:). The critical factor here, to me at least, is that lots of sources discussed the primary campaign, and many did so by talking about Mr. Cartwright. That's sufficient.
479:
119:
83:
179:
367:
146:
75:
67:
503:
714:
679:
662:
627:
607:
586:
560:
542:
516:
467:
449:
424:
392:
352:
327:
309:
280:
252:
230:
208:
140:
61:
267:
until such time as he actually does win the election (if he does) makes sense for now (that section needs rewriting to be up-to-date, btw).
487:
136:
582:
186:
491:
375:
314:
But there are lots of articles on wikipedia who have pages about them even though they haven't done anything notable either e.g
483:
471:
420:
388:
323:
17:
514:
502:, which demonstrate that Cartwright has been the subject of multiple published secondary sources. Roll Call also says he has
475:
152:
416:
384:
319:
598:
as he is certainly "major", running for
Congress, and has achieved press in multiple feature articles, per above.
698:
40:
495:
656:
715:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/news/ap/politics/2012/Apr/25/pa__rep__holden_loses__critz_tops_altmire.html
640:
694:
603:
537:
36:
595:
462:
401:
363:
289:
196:
652:
172:
56:
441:
512:
409:
348:
305:
616:
common sense standards of notability or by the GNG, this meets the requirements for an article.
675:
577:
569:
556:
445:
275:
248:
226:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
693:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
599:
204:
506:
with his "The Law and You" segment airing five nights a week on the NBC affiliate WBRE-TV.
527:
526:– Upon reviewing the links above provided by User:Gobonobo, this person certainly passes
437:
53:
648:
644:
623:
573:
531:
507:
458:
405:
344:
336:
301:
671:
552:
340:
315:
293:
269:
244:
222:
318:
and yet their articles have not been deleted either, so can the article not stay.
265:
United States House of
Representatives elections in Pennsylvania, 2012#District 17
113:
297:
200:
378:
seat. Also he is notable for having defeated the 18-year incumbent
Congressman
379:
343:
for deletion, or improve the article by adding citations, at your leisure.
618:
647:. Be careful of falling into the trap that "if it doesn't meet X, it's
440:, another candidate. Might as well add that article to the AfD.
687:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
461:
with significant coverage in reliable sources. Criterion #2 of
335:. That argument is governed by a policy known colloquially as
643:, which it appears he does, he certainly appears to meet the
199:. Should redirect to article about the congressional race.
572:, and I don't care how safe your district is (See also
109:
105:
101:
372:
171:
217:list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
701:). No further edits should be made to this page.
239:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
400:. We must be looking at different versions of
185:
8:
237:Note: This debate has been included in the
215:Note: This debate has been included in the
368:Pennsylvania's 17th congressional district
236:
214:
362:Clearly fulfills the second criterion of
76:Matt Cartwright (Pennsylvania politician)
68:Matt Cartwright (Pennsylvania politician)
707:
651:" without checking for GNG meeting. -
498:or the majority of the news articles
195:Doesn't meet notability criteria per
7:
504:been a regular face on TV for years
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
733:
436:Slytherining also created
412:) 19:16, 8 June 2012 (UTC
680:15:15, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
663:01:43, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
628:05:56, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
608:19:39, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
594:fulfills criteria #2 for
587:14:40, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
561:13:37, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
339:. Feel free to nominate
62:19:01, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
690:Please do not modify it.
543:21:52, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
517:13:52, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
450:06:27, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
425:23:40, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
393:18:15, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
353:17:38, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
328:17:28, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
310:17:11, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
292:to the link provided by
281:17:08, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
253:20:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
231:20:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
209:16:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
374:due to it being a safe
417:Slytherining Around32
385:Slytherining Around32
320:Slytherining Around32
337:other stuff exists
48:The result was
585:
541:
255:
242:
233:
220:
59:
724:
717:
712:
692:
659:
649:just not notable
581:
540:
538:Northamerica1000
535:
510:
496:National Journal
376:Democratic Party
243:
221:
190:
189:
175:
127:
117:
99:
57:
34:
732:
731:
727:
726:
725:
723:
722:
721:
720:
713:
709:
705:
699:deletion review
688:
661:
657:
536:
508:
438:Brendan Doherty
132:
123:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
730:
728:
719:
718:
706:
704:
703:
683:
682:
665:
655:
653:The Bushranger
630:
610:
589:
563:
545:
520:
519:
500:in this search
468:New York Times
452:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
357:
356:
355:
312:
283:
257:
256:
234:
193:
192:
129:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
729:
716:
711:
708:
702:
700:
696:
691:
685:
684:
681:
677:
673:
669:
666:
664:
660:
658:One ping only
654:
650:
646:
642:
641:WP:POILTICIAN
638:
635:- even if he
634:
631:
629:
625:
621:
620:
614:
611:
609:
605:
601:
597:
596:WP:POLITICIAN
593:
590:
588:
584:
579:
575:
574:Richard Lugar
571:
567:
564:
562:
558:
554:
549:
546:
544:
539:
533:
529:
525:
522:
521:
518:
515:
513:
511:
505:
501:
497:
493:
492:Express-Times
489:
485:
481:
477:
473:
472:Times-Tribune
469:
464:
463:WP:POLITICIAN
460:
456:
453:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
432:
426:
422:
418:
414:
413:
411:
407:
403:
402:WP:POLITICIAN
399:
396:
395:
394:
390:
386:
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
364:WP:POLITICIAN
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
290:WP:POLITICIAN
287:
284:
282:
278:
277:
272:
271:
266:
262:
259:
258:
254:
250:
246:
240:
235:
232:
228:
224:
218:
213:
212:
211:
210:
206:
202:
198:
197:WP:POLITICIAN
188:
184:
181:
178:
174:
170:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
138:
135:
134:Find sources:
130:
126:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
710:
689:
686:
667:
636:
632:
617:
612:
591:
578:UltraExactZZ
565:
547:
523:
480:Morning Call
454:
433:
397:
359:
341:Steve Daines
332:
316:Steve Daines
294:User:Postdlf
285:
274:
268:
260:
194:
182:
176:
168:
161:
155:
149:
143:
133:
49:
47:
31:
28:
600:Smartyllama
534:with ease.
261:Redirecting
159:free images
570:WP:CRYSTAL
380:Tim Holden
695:talk page
245:• Gene93k
223:• Gene93k
54:Sjakkalle
37:talk page
697:or in a
528:WP:BASIC
509:Gobōnobo
484:CBS News
476:The Hill
406:Ubelowme
383:notable.
345:Ubelowme
302:Ubelowme
286:Redirect
120:View log
58:(Check!)
39:or in a
672:Scanlan
553:Hekerui
488:Huff Po
442:Bgwhite
434:Comment
398:Comment
370:in the
333:Comment
298:notable
288:as per
270:postdlf
165:WP refs
153:scholar
93:protect
88:history
645:WP:GNG
637:didn't
548:Delete
532:WP:GNG
459:WP:GNG
457:Meets
201:Arbor8
137:Google
97:delete
639:meet
624:talk
180:JSTOR
141:books
125:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
676:talk
668:Keep
633:Keep
613:Keep
604:talk
592:Keep
566:Keep
557:talk
530:and
524:Keep
466:See
455:Keep
446:talk
421:talk
410:talk
389:talk
360:Keep
349:talk
324:talk
306:talk
276:talk
249:talk
227:talk
205:talk
173:FENS
147:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
50:keep
619:DGG
583:Did
300:.
263:to
187:TWL
122:•
118:– (
678:)
626:)
606:)
559:)
494:,
490:,
486:,
482:,
478:,
474:,
470:,
448:)
423:)
391:)
351:)
326:)
308:)
279:)
251:)
241:.
229:)
219:.
207:)
167:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
674:(
622:(
602:(
580:~
555:(
444:(
419:(
408:(
387:(
347:(
322:(
304:(
273:(
247:(
225:(
203:(
191:)
183:·
177:·
169:·
162:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
139:(
131:(
128:)
116:)
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.