402:
aware), what harm is there in an article on it? I have seen far more stubs on here that tell you a) absolutely nothing about something that b) can be looked up elsewhere already. Leave the 'suggested deletion' on for now, but please can we let someone other than me, try and add some more info please.
401:
guidelines, but I'm hoping that when someone else puts the info in, it will then satisfy it. I thought the point of wikipedia was that anyone could create / edit an article, so why such strict restrictions on what can be placed. Even if he was just a session musician (which he is not, as far as I'm
438:
does not mean that this can be ignored in the hope that someone else will be able to show that. There are an awful lot of articles that should not exist according to policy because so many new articles are created every day that some slip through without being challenged. That does not mean that
547:
THREE relists? C'mon. No reliable sources attesting to his notability. Involved with no notable groups. No evidence of meeting any of the WP:MUSIC criteria. No argument to Keep or rationale behind the article's existence proffered, even by the article creator. AfD open for nearly a MONTH
439:
those that are spotted should be given a free ride. The afd will run its course - if someone can establish notability it does not prevent the article from being recreated. But they will need to do that to prevent it being speedy deleted.
156:
548:
without any of these defects being cured. How about a little less of a search for a decisive head count and more towards a review of the arguments presented, which is (theoretically) how AfDs are supposed to be closed?
457:
150:
252:
Hmmm, he's a drummer, so I guess that falls into your category of "an anonymous figure in the background supporting someone else"; that's what drummers largely do isn't it?
117:
346:
I am still trying to get someone with more knowledge to update the page, with a discography section, and a greater expansion on previous bands. Please bear with me.
430:
And my point is that
Knowledge (XXG) has policies about what should be created and what should not. Those policies explicitly state that article subjects should be
209:
I started the page as a Stub, hoping that someone with some more detailed information could flesh it out for me. He's on TV today if that helps. ITV 3pm!
90:
85:
94:
237:
It might - why is he on TV? Is he being interviewed about his career? Or is he just an anonymous figure in the background supporting someone else?
77:
171:
138:
17:
418:
362:
268:
225:
132:
435:
192:
571:
36:
128:
556:
536:
500:
472:
448:
422:
391:
366:
339:
312:
293:
272:
246:
229:
204:
59:
528:
178:
81:
570:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
431:
406:
350:
284:
and then explain how he fulfils the criteria for notability. Session musicians do not generally meet them.
256:
213:
73:
65:
521:
335:
398:
375:
281:
188:
144:
414:
358:
264:
221:
164:
511:
483:
322:
468:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
331:
379:
549:
496:
410:
354:
260:
217:
308:
55:
444:
387:
289:
242:
200:
464:
111:
492:
514:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
486:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
325:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
304:
50:
440:
383:
285:
238:
196:
303:- Lacks coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. --
564:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
397:
My point is that I don't have the knowledge need to satisfy the
382:? Unless you can show that, the article will be deleted.
458:
list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions
107:
103:
99:
163:
519:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
491:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
330:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
177:
187:No indication of meeting notability guidelines at
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
574:). No further edits should be made to this page.
191:. Played for non notable bands, no independent
8:
456:Note: This debate has been included in the
455:
374:How does that meet the guidelines at
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
591:
473:22:41, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
449:23:50, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
423:20:21, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
392:16:22, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
367:15:36, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
340:00:02, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
313:16:33, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
294:19:25, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
273:19:02, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
247:11:10, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
230:07:32, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
205:19:54, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
567:Please do not modify it.
557:08:17, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
537:21:45, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
60:05:04, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
501:14:34, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
74:Matt Cowley (drummer)
66:Matt Cowley (drummer)
436:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
193:WP:reliable sources
44:The result was
539:
503:
475:
461:
426:
409:comment added by
370:
353:comment added by
342:
276:
259:comment added by
233:
216:comment added by
582:
569:
553:
535:
533:
526:
518:
516:
490:
488:
462:
425:
403:
369:
347:
329:
327:
275:
253:
232:
210:
182:
181:
167:
115:
97:
34:
590:
589:
585:
584:
583:
581:
580:
579:
578:
572:deletion review
565:
551:
529:
522:
520:
509:
499:
481:
404:
348:
320:
254:
211:
124:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
588:
586:
577:
576:
560:
559:
541:
540:
517:
506:
505:
504:
495:
489:
478:
477:
476:
452:
451:
395:
394:
344:
343:
328:
317:
316:
315:
297:
296:
250:
249:
185:
184:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
587:
575:
573:
568:
562:
561:
558:
555:
554:
546:
543:
542:
538:
534:
532:
527:
525:
515:
513:
508:
507:
502:
498:
494:
487:
485:
480:
479:
474:
470:
466:
459:
454:
453:
450:
446:
442:
437:
433:
429:
428:
427:
424:
420:
416:
412:
408:
400:
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
373:
372:
371:
368:
364:
360:
356:
352:
341:
337:
333:
326:
324:
319:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
299:
298:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
278:
277:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:
234:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
207:
206:
202:
198:
194:
190:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
127:
126:Find sources:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
566:
563:
550:
544:
530:
523:
510:
482:
405:— Preceding
396:
349:— Preceding
345:
321:
300:
280:Please read
255:— Preceding
251:
212:— Preceding
208:
186:
174:
168:
160:
153:
147:
141:
135:
125:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
552:Ravenswing
399:WP:MUSICBIO
376:WP:MUSICBIO
332:Ron Ritzman
282:WP:MUSICBIO
189:WP:MUSICBIO
151:free images
411:Markheslop
355:Markheslop
261:Markheslop
218:Markheslop
465:• Gene93k
524:Baseball
512:Relisted
484:Relisted
419:contribs
407:unsigned
363:contribs
351:unsigned
323:Relisted
269:contribs
257:unsigned
226:contribs
214:unsigned
118:View log
545:Delete:
531:Watcher
434:. That
432:notable
157:WP refs
145:scholar
91:protect
86:history
380:WP:GNG
301:Delete
129:Google
95:delete
46:delete
493:Logan
172:JSTOR
133:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
48:. --
16:<
497:Talk
469:talk
445:talk
415:talk
388:talk
359:talk
336:talk
309:talk
305:Whpq
290:talk
265:talk
243:talk
222:talk
201:talk
165:FENS
139:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
463:--
441:noq
384:noq
378:or
286:noq
239:noq
197:noq
179:TWL
116:– (
471:)
460:.
447:)
421:)
417:•
390:)
365:)
361:•
338:)
311:)
292:)
271:)
267:•
245:)
228:)
224:•
203:)
195:.
159:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
467:(
443:(
413:(
386:(
357:(
334:(
307:(
288:(
263:(
241:(
220:(
199:(
183:)
175:·
169:·
161:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
136:·
131:(
123:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.