Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Matt Gifford - Knowledge

Source 📝

518:). I am Matt Gifford, the subject of this article/entry. I have many issues with your above comment. Firstly, where does the publisher's website state in any way that they are a vanity press? Please provide details to back this up. Packt do openly invite developers and individuals within the communities to submit book proposals to them in an attempt to extend knowledge in various areas. Having written my own book through them, I can also quite happily discuss with you the levels of chapter synopsis, communications to and from the publishing house, and my final contract with them. So, they do freely accept proposals, but they do not publish every individual who does send ideas. Secondly, and more importantly, I am concerned that you have so easily publicly stated that this article was written by me (it wasnt) and that I have spammed myself into other articles. As a developer, writer and speaker, my online identity is incredibly important to me, and I take great offence in the implication and seeing my name associated with spam, which I see as libellous. Having read through the history of the article and the original author's other contributions, the only other entry appears to be the addition of the book to the OOP page, which is an incredibly valid addition. As 526:) originally stated, this is the first and only book to cover that subject for the development language ColdFusion - one of the reasons why the book was written. Again, the use of language from above commenter that it's going to take 'a lot of work to weed out all of his spam' is incorrect and unjustified. It is one additional entry from what I can see, and the negative implications of these actions against my name is simply wrong and unjustified. I respectfully request that actions are taken to remedy these slurs against my name (spam related). I have not written this article or added to it (in fact, I had to search through to find my login details as i havent used this account for so long), and I am not adding any note here in regards to the actual article; purely a defence against my own name. 395:'non-notable blogger' was not published by vanity press. Research into Packt Publishing will show it's a reputable tech publishing house that does not publish 'for a fee', nor was the publication self-funded. The book has also been used as a core resource for presentations on the subject, as well as teaching material at various courses. I will find details and add to entry. Again, this is the first and only book published that deals with 441: 266:
Following a series of content revisions for this subject, this author created an important publication (the first to cover OOP for ColdFusion development) and various other sources have been included, as well as external publications relating to UNEP work. I believe that
229:
Running a search on books using the above find sources tool brings up the author's publication. The publication itself has received acclaim and positive reviews from the development community it was targeting. These reviews can be used in reference to the author.
168: 493:, is nothing more than a vanity press that takes all comers. Also, Gifford has spammed himself into multiple articles throughout Knowledge, and it's going to take us a lot of work to weed out all of his spam. 247:
Addition of cite and extra publication where the author was involved with the project and referenced as a contributor, as well as developer of iT systems accompanying / forming a key part of the publication
233:
Please view the article with updated cite information. There is more to be added in, relating to publications through the UNEP relating to development work in regards to coral reef databases.
478:
User "Mrs. Gorilla" is voting multiple times here and has already admitted, on his user page, that he is Matt Gifford himself. This article is nothing more than self-promo
129: 162: 293: 316: 544:- after short investigation even to an inexperienced user such as myself, you can clearly see by following the conversation from the start that 560: 214: 399:
in the ColdFusion development environment. This was an important publication for those within this community. As such, this would fall under
553: 436:
publisher. While perhaps it is not technically a "vanity press", this is a step down from more reputable publishers. According to
407:
4.a) (significant monument within the community to which it was aimed) and 1) as a well-recognised individual within the community.
207: 275:
in regards to providing more information to the author's background and previous history (from a career and personal perspective).
102: 97: 106: 17: 602: 462: 183: 89: 150: 396: 49: 621: 36: 596: 456: 620:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
144: 582: 531: 140: 606: 586: 535: 502: 466: 416: 387: 359: 355: 331: 308: 284: 257: 242: 223: 71: 93: 549: 545: 523: 519: 412: 408: 280: 276: 253: 249: 238: 234: 190: 451:
eventually become important for the reason you say, but that happy day has not yet come and, alas,
176: 85: 77: 404: 491: 327: 304: 64: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
578: 574: 527: 515: 498: 483: 444: 429: 400: 383: 371: 351: 342: 552:) is not me, nor has ever claimed to be. The initial draft of the article was userfied by 433: 156: 487: 479: 452: 272: 268: 204: 200: 53: 375: 323: 300: 57: 123: 570: 511: 494: 379: 577:) seems to be spouting inacuracies about individuals involved in this article. 428:. Simply having recently published a book is not a criterion for notability. 345:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
370:. Non-notable blogger whose sole book is out from a vanity press. Fails 437: 614:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
490:. Furthermore, his publisher, as explained on its own webpage 595:. The subject of the article does not seem to be notable. 443:, so it does not even come close to the requirements of 119: 115: 111: 175: 350:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 199:Lack of secondary sources, does not appear to meet 440:, there is only one library that holds this book 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 624:). No further edits should be made to this page. 52:have been found for this individual that allow 294:list of Software-related deletion discussions 189: 8: 317:list of Authors-related deletion discussions 315:Note: This debate has been included in the 292:Note: This debate has been included in the 314: 291: 569:to act as a backup. As such, once again 48:. With no prejudice to recreation once 7: 510:In response to above comment from 24: 453:Knowledge is not a crystal ball 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 447:. It may be that this book 397:Object-Oriented Programming 641: 607:20:08, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 587:13:04, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 536:07:36, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 503:00:40, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 467:20:16, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 417:20:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC) 388:08:13, 22 April 2011 (UTC) 360:00:02, 19 April 2011 (UTC) 332:16:07, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 309:16:06, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 285:10:00, 18 April 2011 (UTC) 258:16:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 243:15:52, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 224:14:04, 12 April 2011 (UTC) 72:15:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 542:addition to above comment 617:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 482:. It does not satisfy 271:has been met, as has 564:& the soapdish 218:& the soapdish 44:The result was 567: 362: 334: 320: 311: 297: 221: 632: 619: 599: 566: 561: 558: 459: 430:Packt Publishing 349: 347: 321: 298: 220: 215: 212: 194: 193: 179: 127: 109: 61: 50:reliable sources 34: 640: 639: 635: 634: 633: 631: 630: 629: 628: 622:deletion review 615: 597: 562: 554: 457: 434:print on demand 340: 216: 208: 136: 100: 84: 81: 68: 59: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 638: 636: 627: 626: 610: 609: 598:Sławomir Biały 539: 538: 505: 472: 471: 470: 469: 458:Sławomir Biały 420: 419: 390: 364: 363: 348: 337: 336: 335: 312: 288: 287: 228: 197: 196: 133: 80: 75: 66: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 637: 625: 623: 618: 612: 611: 608: 604: 600: 594: 591: 590: 589: 588: 584: 580: 576: 572: 568: 565: 559: 557: 551: 547: 543: 537: 533: 529: 525: 521: 517: 513: 509: 506: 504: 500: 496: 492: 489: 485: 481: 477: 474: 473: 468: 464: 460: 454: 450: 446: 442: 439: 435: 431: 427: 424: 423: 422: 421: 418: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 394: 391: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 369: 366: 365: 361: 357: 353: 346: 344: 339: 338: 333: 329: 325: 318: 313: 310: 306: 302: 295: 290: 289: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 265: 262: 261: 260: 259: 255: 251: 245: 244: 240: 236: 231: 226: 225: 222: 219: 213: 211: 206: 202: 192: 188: 185: 182: 178: 174: 170: 167: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 142: 139: 138:Find sources: 134: 131: 125: 121: 117: 113: 108: 104: 99: 95: 91: 87: 83: 82: 79: 76: 74: 73: 70: 69: 63: 62: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 616: 613: 592: 563: 555: 541: 540: 507: 475: 448: 425: 392: 367: 341: 263: 246: 232: 227: 217: 209: 198: 186: 180: 172: 165: 159: 153: 147: 137: 86:Matt Gifford 78:Matt Gifford 65: 58: 45: 43: 31: 28: 579:Mattgifford 556:Catfish Jim 528:Mattgifford 405:WP:CREATIVE 352:Ron Ritzman 210:Catfish Jim 163:free images 56:.to be met 546:MrsGorilla 520:MrsGorilla 409:MrsGorilla 277:MrsGorilla 250:MrsGorilla 235:MrsGorilla 60:Wifione 484:WP:AUTHOR 445:WP:AUTHOR 401:WP:AUTHOR 372:WP:AUTHOR 324:• Gene93k 301:• Gene93k 476:Comment. 438:Worldcat 343:Relisted 130:View log 508:Comment 488:WP:BOOK 480:WP:SPAM 426:Comment 169:WP refs 157:scholar 103:protect 98:history 67:....... 593:Delete 571:Qworty 512:Qworty 495:Qworty 403:-: --> 380:Qworty 368:Delete 273:WP:BIO 269:WP:GNG 205:WP:BIO 201:WP:GNG 141:Google 107:delete 54:WP:GNG 46:delete 432:is a 376:WP:BK 184:JSTOR 145:books 124:views 116:watch 112:links 16:< 603:talk 583:talk 575:talk 550:talk 532:talk 524:talk 516:talk 499:talk 463:talk 449:does 413:talk 393:Keep 384:talk 374:and 356:talk 328:talk 305:talk 281:talk 264:Keep 254:talk 239:talk 177:FENS 151:news 120:logs 94:talk 90:edit 486:or 455:. 322:-- 299:-- 203:or 191:TWL 128:– ( 605:) 585:) 534:) 501:) 465:) 415:) 386:) 378:. 358:) 330:) 319:. 307:) 296:. 283:) 256:) 241:) 171:) 122:| 118:| 114:| 110:| 105:| 101:| 96:| 92:| 601:( 581:( 573:( 548:( 530:( 522:( 514:( 497:( 461:( 411:( 382:( 354:( 326:( 303:( 279:( 252:( 237:( 195:) 187:· 181:· 173:· 166:· 160:· 154:· 148:· 143:( 135:( 132:) 126:) 88:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
deletion review
reliable sources
WP:GNG
Wifione
.......
15:01, 26 April 2011 (UTC)
Matt Gifford
Matt Gifford
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
WP:GNG
WP:BIO

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.