206:, you would easily meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards for notability. Third-party sources in addition to Ottinger's TV station (which is a reliable source, anyway) have now been included to support the article's assertions. By the way, the lack of a birth date as a justification for deletion is a new one on me. I guess we better delete the article on
280:
I would like to note that the above user seems to be stalking a lot of the discussions I take a part in, and is discussing the opposite viewpoint on purpose, possibly to make me look bad. Second, I do not feel his reasoning in this vote is valid. There are sources, but none of them are
420:
Why is this even controversial? His main claim to fame is that he hosts a high school quiz competition that airs
Saturday afternoons on a small-town PBS affiliate. The "efforts to assert notability" are not successful as the sources cited in the article are not independent and reliable.
244:. Should also note that the two keep voters appear to be very biased on game shows, and seem to want to keep the article for their like of anything game show related, not the merits of how this does not meet notability guidelines. None of the references count as
497:. He also produces television programming for public schools in the area. Then again, I'm a game show fan, what does my vote count? *rolls eyes* I find it funny, just because people who are game show fans are voting in this, doesn't mean their votes don't count.
201:
If you had hosted a television game show for almost two decades, been nominated for a statewide Emmy award, operated one of the main
Internet forums and several leading web sites on game shows, and given Ken Jennings a real run for his money on
474:-Person is notable, and not just for local TELEVISION game shows, (not radio as the author suggested). Is also the owner and adminstrator of one of the largest game show forums, with frequent posters that work on game shows, including
360:
349:
I don't contribute much here any more, and look at these recent AFDs that I have commented on that he has jumped in soon after I have edited: , , , and this afd. I'm not fully certain of things, but I am suspicious.
173:; QuizBusters is a televised game show, not a radio one. He is also notable in the game show world due to his administrator status with The Game Show Forum, his websites, and being a Jeopardy! contestant.
88:
329:
is following someone around with the intent of causing annoyance or distress. There's no evidence of that intention. That said, without blaming anyone, I think it would be best if both of you follow
226:– with an, er, interesting picture – that calls Matt Ottinger "highly esteemed and legendary." Well, I'd agree with the former, but I doubt that Matt would call himself "legendary" (wink).
142:
378:
me in other discussions, and after you made your recommendation above, should curb his suspicions. I will, however, avoid engaging Danny per your suggestion. Sincerely, --
333:: disengagement. Your prior interaction has been tense, to say the least. You'd both be better off to not comment in AFDs in which the other has commented. Please do so.--
48:. - Consensus was that coverage of Matt Ottinger was not independent of Matt Ottinger or his employers and his noted fame has yet to be covered by independent sources. --
83:
185:; I looked for independent coverage, but found only stuff from his local school and station, which is not independent and hence not sufficient per
240:
NN local tv personality/webmaster. None of the websites are notable in a mainstream context, and he hosts a public-access show, which fails
17:
433:
380:
314:
262:
115:
110:
119:
501:
466:
442:
399:
386:
354:
341:
320:
303:
289:
268:
252:
230:
214:
193:
177:
164:
67:
102:
62:
299:
437:
516:
160:
standards - so non-notable that we don't know when or where he was born red flags of notability fo modern biographies.
36:
515:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
391:
That complicates matters, but it's a massive AFD. I don't think
Dannycali participated by following you.--
429:
152:
nn local radio game show host, previous afd ended in no consensus but his notability is still not up to
106:
285:. They are a bunch of nn/minor websites that may prove a point, but do little to prove notability.
174:
161:
98:
73:
366:
19:22, 19 September 2007 Le Grand Roi des
Citrouilles (Talk | contribs) (35,224 bytes) (k) (undo)
56:
326:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
450:-half because I don't think he's notable, half because I've learnt to recognise the smell of
186:
422:
396:
338:
260:, because of multiple references and efforts to assert notability in article. Sincerely, --
227:
223:
211:
241:
157:
153:
330:
282:
245:
498:
351:
286:
249:
491:
484:
481:
478:
306:. I participate in a variety of discussion, not all of which happen to include you:
190:
49:
487:
207:
136:
463:
392:
334:
475:
494:
361:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/University of
Florida Taser incident
222:. AfD's aren't usually noted for humor. But I just found this interesting
325:
Roi, that was not a personal attack. Dannycali, Roi is not stalking you;
460:
Knowledge (XXG) is in good hands as long as some keep posters keep it up
369:
19:43, 19 September 2007 Dannycali (Talk | contribs) (38,137 bytes)
493:, even being one of the people Jennings defeated in an episode of
509:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
210:, then, because historians aren't certain about his birth date.
359:
Dear Chaser, just to point something out from the history of
452:
very serious, intelligent and well thought through analysis
310:
307:
132:
128:
124:
89:
Articles for deletion/Matt
Ottinger (2nd nomination)
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
519:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
458:, and it looks like I'm not the only one.
248:, and are just local/minor publications.
454:from some people on the keep side here
81:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
304:Knowledge (XXG):No personal attacks
84:Articles for deletion/Matt Ottinger
80:
24:
300:Knowledge (XXG):Assume good faith
480:, Television game show producer
456:whose conduct is beyond reproach
502:20:03, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
467:02:22, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
443:02:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
400:16:27, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
387:23:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
374:Therefore, someone who posted
355:20:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
342:18:15, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
331:step two of dispute resolution
321:14:50, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
290:02:26, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
269:22:41, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
253:17:19, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
231:12:48, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
215:12:18, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
194:03:03, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
178:02:34, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
165:01:57, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
68:09:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
1:
382:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
316:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
264:Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles
536:
512:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
79:AfDs for this article:
312:, etc. Sincerely, --
441:
527:
514:
427:
385:
383:
319:
317:
267:
265:
140:
122:
65:
59:
54:
34:
535:
534:
530:
529:
528:
526:
525:
524:
523:
517:deletion review
510:
381:
379:
315:
313:
263:
261:
113:
97:
94:
77:
63:
57:
50:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
533:
531:
522:
521:
505:
504:
469:
445:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
372:
371:
370:
367:
357:
293:
292:
272:
271:
255:
235:
234:
233:
196:
180:
162:Carlossuarez46
147:
146:
93:
92:
91:
86:
78:
76:
71:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
532:
520:
518:
513:
507:
506:
503:
500:
496:
492:
489:
485:
483:
482:Ron Greenberg
479:
477:
473:
470:
468:
465:
461:
457:
453:
449:
446:
444:
439:
435:
431:
426:
425:
419:
415:
414:
401:
398:
394:
390:
389:
388:
384:
377:
373:
368:
365:
364:
362:
358:
356:
353:
348:
345:
344:
343:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
323:
322:
318:
311:
308:
305:
301:
297:
296:
295:
294:
291:
288:
284:
279:
276:
275:
274:
273:
270:
266:
259:
256:
254:
251:
247:
243:
239:
236:
232:
229:
225:
221:
218:
217:
216:
213:
209:
205:
200:
197:
195:
192:
188:
184:
181:
179:
176:
175:Andy Saunders
172:
169:
168:
167:
166:
163:
159:
155:
151:
144:
138:
134:
130:
126:
121:
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
99:Matt Ottinger
96:
95:
90:
87:
85:
82:
75:
74:Matt Ottinger
72:
70:
69:
66:
60:
55:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
511:
508:
488:Ken Jennings
471:
459:
455:
451:
447:
423:
417:
375:
346:
298:Please read
277:
257:
237:
219:
208:Jesus Christ
203:
198:
182:
170:
149:
148:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
424:ObiterDicta
228:Casey Abell
212:Casey Abell
476:Randy West
499:FamicomJL
495:Jeopardy!
430:pleadings
352:Dannycali
287:Dannycali
250:Dannycali
204:Jeopardy!
490:himself
327:stalking
191:Dicklyon
143:View log
52:Jreferee
438:appeals
347:Comment
278:Comment
220:Comment
187:WP:NOTE
116:protect
111:history
486:, and
464:JJJ999
448:delete
434:errata
418:Delete
393:Chaser
335:Chaser
242:WP:BIO
238:Delete
183:Delete
158:WP:BLP
154:WP:BIO
150:Delete
120:delete
46:Delete
416:(ec)
376:after
283:WP:RS
246:WP:RS
137:views
129:watch
125:links
16:<
472:Keep
302:and
258:Keep
224:note
199:Keep
171:Keep
156:and
133:logs
107:talk
103:edit
141:– (
436:•
432:•
428:(
395:-
363::
337:-
309:,
189:.
135:|
131:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
462:.
440:)
397:T
339:T
145:)
139:)
101:(
64:C
61:/
58:T
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.