Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Matt Smith (illustrator) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

206:, contributer to numerous children's magazines, independent comic books, and album covers, plus winner of several small awards (one of them referenced), all mentioned in the article. While I do agree that the article needs more references, I think that individual {{fact}} tags or a more general {{refimprove}} tag would be better than deleting the entire article. 253:
felt that there already were two such references which were both independent of the subject and reliable as far as the claims which were made. It is certainly possible that adding {{fact}} tags may solve nothing, but since they have
285: 262:
adding such tags to the article before listing it for AfD. I simply feel that deleting the article at this point is premature, especially since I personally feel that notability has been proven.
115: 309: 231:
tag was added, no references were supplied, so how are a couple {{fact}} tags going to help? This article can always be restored if reliable sources are found. —
88: 83: 92: 249:: You added a PROD originally because you felt that there were no "reliable, third-party published sources" in the article. I removed the PROD because 75: 227:: While that's an argument that can be entertained for a brand new article, this one has been here for a year and a half. Even when a 170: 259: 17: 123: 79: 373: 356: 339: 321: 299: 271: 239: 215: 198: 181: 155: 138: 57: 388: 36: 126:. Specifically, person has not been the subject of coverage by reliable, third-party published sources. Contested 387:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
369: 317: 71: 63: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
175: 194: 165: 267: 233: 211: 149: 132: 365: 313: 352: 53: 122:
Biographical article on an illustrator that I do not believe meets the notability criteria of
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
127: 295: 190: 263: 207: 335: 348: 49: 109: 291: 331: 364:
for now, revisit later. Some sources on page, of questionable value.
381:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
258:
been added to this article, there is simply no way to tell. The
105: 101: 97: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 391:). No further edits should be made to this page. 189:unless reliable third party sources are found. 286:list of Comics and animation-related deletions 130:, so comes here for discussion. Thank you. — 8: 308:: This debate has been included in the 284:: This debate has been included in the 310:list of Visual arts-related deletions 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 124:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people) 24: 260:AfD process page even recommends 1: 58:20:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC) 374:08:34, 9 December 2007 (UTC) 357:02:45, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 340:19:00, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 322:16:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 300:14:44, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 272:23:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 240:19:13, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 216:00:12, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 199:23:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 182:22:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 156:21:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 139:21:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC) 408: 384:Please do not modify it. 163:, seems notable enough. 72:Matt Smith (illustrator) 64:Matt Smith (illustrator) 32:Please do not modify it. 347:per nom. not notable 48:defaulting to keep. 147:, as nominator. — 324: 298: 289: 229:proposed deletion 399: 386: 330:per Wyatt Riot. 304: 294: 280: 238: 178: 173: 168: 154: 137: 113: 95: 34: 407: 406: 402: 401: 400: 398: 397: 396: 395: 389:deletion review 382: 232: 176: 171: 166: 148: 131: 86: 70: 67: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 405: 403: 394: 393: 377: 376: 366:Fee Fi Foe Fum 359: 342: 325: 314:David Eppstein 302: 277: 276: 275: 274: 243: 242: 219: 218: 201: 184: 158: 120: 119: 66: 61: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 404: 392: 390: 385: 379: 378: 375: 371: 367: 363: 360: 358: 354: 350: 346: 343: 341: 337: 333: 329: 326: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 301: 297: 293: 287: 283: 279: 278: 273: 269: 265: 261: 257: 252: 248: 245: 244: 241: 237: 236: 230: 226: 223: 222: 221: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 200: 196: 192: 188: 185: 183: 180: 179: 174: 169: 162: 159: 157: 153: 152: 146: 143: 142: 141: 140: 136: 135: 129: 125: 117: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 69: 68: 65: 62: 60: 59: 55: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 383: 380: 361: 344: 327: 305: 281: 255: 250: 246: 234: 228: 224: 203: 186: 164: 160: 150: 144: 133: 121: 46:No consensus 45: 43: 31: 28: 191:AnteaterZot 264:Wyatt Riot 235:Satori Son 208:Wyatt Riot 151:Satori Son 134:Satori Son 349:Clubmarx 116:View log 50:Tyrenius 247:Comment 225:Comment 89:protect 84:history 345:Delete 292:Hiding 187:Delete 172:rocket 145:Delete 93:delete 256:never 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 370:talk 362:Keep 353:talk 336:talk 332:Artw 328:Keep 318:talk 312:. – 306:Note 282:Note 268:talk 212:talk 204:Keep 195:talk 161:Keep 128:PROD 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 54:talk 290:-- 288:. 177:boy 167:Red 114:– ( 372:) 355:) 338:) 320:) 270:) 214:) 197:) 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 56:) 368:( 351:( 334:( 316:( 296:T 266:( 251:I 210:( 193:( 118:) 112:) 74:( 52:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Tyrenius
talk
20:08, 10 December 2007 (UTC)
Matt Smith (illustrator)
Matt Smith (illustrator)
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Knowledge (XXG):Notability (people)
PROD
Satori Son
21:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Satori Son
21:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
Red
rocket
boy
22:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
AnteaterZot
talk
23:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.