293:. I can see the deleted version, and while some of the wording has been altered, the structure and content are pretty much the same. In some places, there are near-identical constructions, like "he drives programs" (deleted version) vs "where he is responsible for driving the product" (current). I concur that this article still doesn't demonstrate notability per the nominator's reasoning. ♠
221:
I am still utterly unconvinced. I do not consider what I see as significant, independent coverage - several articles about Amazon have a quote from him, a short soundbite given by virtue of his role with them. Just one article actually focuses on him in a manner in which I would consider supports the
217:
I tried to CSD it when I noticed it had returned, but an admin (User:Boing! said
Zebedee) rejected it with the reasoning 'Article is quite different from the AFD-deleted one, with signficantly different sources'. To me, from memory, it has a very similar tone. Feels almost identical to the article I
229:. For example, Jo Bertram from Uber (UK/Europe manager) gets considerably more press coverage than him (e.g. when commenting on a ruling by TfL or regarding labour law) but still does not have an article, perhaps because this coverage is considered
345:
For example, I looked at the New York Times article, but the star of that one is Andrew R. Jassy, who is a senior vice president. This person is just manager of "product strategy" (marketing?) with one promotional quote.
182:
213:
This was previously deleted with a unanimous 10 out of 10 delete vote. It has been reinstated, again by a COI/SPA (an issue which plagued the original) for what appears to be overtly promotional reasons.
81:
250:
135:
270:
176:
142:
76:
17:
355:
337:
301:
282:
262:
242:
233:. In comparison, the few sources in this article constitute minimal coverage and not what is enough to sustain an article.
60:
108:
103:
197:
112:
164:
95:
374:
40:
321:
158:
318:
370:
278:
258:
36:
154:
225:
This seems to be very routine and minimal coverage, and does not add up to notability sufficient for
351:
190:
238:
204:
333:
230:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
369:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
274:
254:
347:
314:
310:
170:
99:
54:
298:
234:
226:
329:
325:
129:
218:
remember nominating (bearing in mind this was 9 months ago and I can't see it).
91:
66:
294:
222:
notability argument, a feature in the Puget Sound
Business Journal.
363:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
125:
121:
117:
189:
251:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
377:). No further edits should be made to this page.
82:Articles for deletion/Matt Wood (2nd nomination)
271:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
203:
8:
269:Note: This debate has been included in the
249:Note: This debate has been included in the
268:
248:
74:
7:
313:. Went to medical school blah blah
73:
24:
77:Articles for deletion/Matt Wood
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
356:19:21, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
338:21:44, 26 January 2017 (UTC)
302:04:58, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
283:03:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
263:03:10, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
243:01:02, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
61:08:23, 31 January 2017 (UTC)
394:
366:Please do not modify it.
322:obscure redlinked person
32:Please do not modify it.
72:AfDs for this article:
315:did this little thing
326:a few crappy cites
285:
265:
385:
368:
328:blah blah blah.
319:worked with some
208:
207:
193:
145:
133:
115:
59:
57:
34:
393:
392:
388:
387:
386:
384:
383:
382:
381:
375:deletion review
364:
150:
141:
106:
90:
87:
70:
55:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
391:
389:
380:
379:
359:
358:
340:
309:as faiing the
304:
287:
286:
266:
211:
210:
147:
86:
85:
84:
79:
71:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
390:
378:
376:
372:
367:
361:
360:
357:
353:
349:
344:
341:
339:
335:
331:
327:
323:
320:
316:
312:
308:
305:
303:
300:
296:
292:
289:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
267:
264:
260:
256:
252:
247:
246:
245:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
223:
219:
215:
206:
202:
199:
196:
192:
188:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
160:
156:
153:
152:Find sources:
148:
144:
140:
137:
131:
127:
123:
119:
114:
110:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
88:
83:
80:
78:
75:
68:
65:
63:
62:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
365:
362:
342:
306:
290:
224:
220:
216:
212:
200:
194:
186:
179:
173:
167:
161:
151:
138:
49:
47:
31:
28:
275:Lepricavark
255:Lepricavark
177:free images
324:blah blah
317:blah blah
231:WP:Routine
371:talk page
348:W Nowicki
311:prof test
92:Matt Wood
67:Matt Wood
37:talk page
373:or in a
235:Rayman60
136:View log
39:or in a
330:Bearian
183:WP refs
171:scholar
109:protect
104:history
343:Delete
307:Delete
299:(talk)
291:Delete
227:WP:GNG
155:Google
113:delete
50:delete
198:JSTOR
159:books
143:Stats
130:views
122:watch
118:links
16:<
352:talk
334:talk
279:talk
259:talk
239:talk
191:FENS
165:news
126:logs
100:talk
96:edit
56:czar
295:PMC
205:TWL
134:– (
52:.
354:)
336:)
297:♠
281:)
273:.
261:)
253:.
241:)
185:)
128:|
124:|
120:|
116:|
111:|
107:|
102:|
98:|
350:(
332:(
277:(
257:(
237:(
209:)
201:·
195:·
187:·
180:·
174:·
168:·
162:·
157:(
149:(
146:)
139:·
132:)
94:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.