460:. This discussion does raise the question of the ex officio notability of clergy of major denominations who hold leadership positions. There don't seem to be WP guidelines on this. I suggested that in the church of Rome Cardinals would be notable. Would this extend to bishops? Where would it stop? I note that this subject is one rank below a bishop.
48:. I can't see a consensus to delete here. The discussion (which was in several places was happily nuanced) acknowledges that the subject has a measure of notability, but there was disagreement as to whether it reached the level of sufficiency necessary for a separate article. Since it's already been relisted, I'm ended this one as no consensus.
547:
I don't think being one of three vicars general is notable. Taking another look at the article, though, I saw (buried at the bottom) "President, Paurastya
Vidyapitham (Pontifical Oriental Institute of Religious Studies)," which may contribute to notability. However, the article is woefully short of
596:
meets WP:PROF for his administrative role a head of a seminary. That by alone is sufficient. Not that he seems to be a bishop, but we have generally included bishops of territorial churches as notable, on the basis that there administrative role is sufficient.
543:
Good point; it may be appropriate to flag the article for rescue. I've tried to rescue articles by this creator before and failed; the key issue will be whether there are any sources describing his work as consultor, rather than just stating the bare
524:- is removed I would be prepared to vote keep as the input to doctrine as an consultor is important. One problem is that a large number of inferior articles have been created by this creator and the adequate ones can get lost in a flood of dross.
617:
I think headship of the seminary, as a key to notability, will depend on its size (I don't know what that is), but that is probably the key notability claim. I don't think being one of three assistants to the bishop counts as notability. --
168:
239:
265:
162:
422:
216:
123:
365:
641:
485:, I would argue that you could perhaps take ex-officio notability down to bishops, but I don't think you can possibly take it further than that. --
128:
96:
91:
100:
83:
671:
183:
520:. I am also inclined to include bishops ex-officio. If the false information in this article-that the subject is a member of the
150:
17:
521:
414:
311:
307:
208:
310:
then that would appear to be notable, but I can't see clear evidence that he actually is a member. In the WP article on the
314:
it says "The
Pontifical Biblical Commission is a committee of Cardinals" but the subject does not appear to be a cardinal.
58:
548:
reliable third-party references (and one of the ones that exists says simply "I'd like to thank Dr
Vellanickal"). --
144:
752:
729:
710:
685:
660:
627:
608:
585:
557:
533:
508:
494:
469:
450:
434:
395:
377:
358:
340:
323:
298:
280:
254:
228:
65:
767:
36:
140:
766:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
87:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
654:
190:
724:
705:
680:
294:
718:, per above. I feel that he meets enough criteria overall to be notable and applicable to Knowledge.
529:
482:
465:
354:
349:
of the Roman
Catholic Church is ex officio notable but it seems that the subject is not one of them.
319:
619:
549:
486:
426:
387:
369:
747:
623:
553:
490:
430:
391:
373:
176:
79:
71:
648:
504:
446:
336:
224:
156:
737:, seminary administrator and not-bishop. Author of a lot of monographs which don't get cited.
719:
700:
675:
290:
276:
250:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
383:
203:, since his doctoral thesis has been cited 18 times, but that's about it. As a churchman, he
569:
54:
525:
461:
350:
315:
477:
That's a very good point, and it's a pity there are no good guidelines. By analogy with
739:
478:
410:
331:
I had assumed he was one of the "consultors", but I can't get any confirmation either.
200:
697:
604:
500:
442:
418:
332:
220:
212:
578:
272:
246:
117:
49:
599:
346:
572:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
760:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
441:
Oh, and he is one of three vicars general there, by the way.
240:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
219:, but neither of those positions seem inherently notable..
499:
Yes, I've been working with bishops as the rule of thumb.
364:
Consultor to the
Oriental Congregation, apparently. See
113:
109:
105:
175:
577:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
289:Doesn't seem to be notable, sounds like a resume.
266:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
770:). No further edits should be made to this page.
189:
8:
425:don't seem quite enough for notability. --
642:list of India-related deletion discussions
636:
260:
234:
640:: This debate has been included in the
264:: This debate has been included in the
238:: This debate has been included in the
7:
670:This article has been nominated for
413:, and his roles as consultor to the
382:And no, not a cardinal. He's not on
24:
696:I have tagged this article for
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
522:Pontifical Biblical Commission
415:Pontifical Biblical Commission
312:Pontifical Biblical Commission
308:Pontifical Biblical Commission
209:Pontifical Biblical Commission
1:
787:
753:09:30, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
730:07:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
711:07:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
686:07:01, 29 March 2010 (UTC)
661:09:01, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
628:11:20, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
609:01:33, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
586:00:17, 28 March 2010 (UTC)
558:06:41, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
534:23:50, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
509:21:10, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
495:11:59, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
470:10:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
451:05:12, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
435:05:06, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
396:05:14, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
378:05:03, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
359:04:48, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
341:04:25, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
324:04:03, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
299:01:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
281:01:08, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
255:01:07, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
229:06:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
66:22:16, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
763:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
199:As a scholar he fails
306:If he is a member of
207:was a member of the
80:Matthew Vellanickal
72:Matthew Vellanickal
44:The result was
688:
663:
645:
588:
345:I think that any
283:
269:
257:
243:
63:
61:So let it be done
56:
778:
765:
751:
744:
727:
722:
708:
703:
683:
678:
666:
657:
651:
646:
583:
576:
574:
270:
244:
194:
193:
179:
131:
121:
103:
59:
55:
34:
786:
785:
781:
780:
779:
777:
776:
775:
774:
768:deletion review
761:
740:
738:
725:
720:
706:
701:
681:
676:
655:
649:
579:
567:
136:
127:
94:
78:
75:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
784:
782:
773:
772:
756:
755:
732:
713:
690:
689:
664:
633:
632:
631:
630:
612:
611:
590:
589:
575:
564:
563:
562:
561:
560:
545:
538:
537:
514:
513:
512:
511:
474:
473:
454:
453:
438:
437:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
380:
328:
327:
301:
284:
258:
197:
196:
133:
129:AfD statistics
74:
69:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
783:
771:
769:
764:
758:
757:
754:
749:
745:
743:
736:
733:
731:
728:
723:
717:
714:
712:
709:
704:
699:
695:
692:
691:
687:
684:
679:
673:
669:
665:
662:
659:
658:
652:
643:
639:
635:
634:
629:
625:
621:
616:
615:
614:
613:
610:
606:
602:
601:
595:
592:
591:
587:
584:
582:
573:
571:
566:
565:
559:
555:
551:
546:
542:
541:
540:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
516:
515:
510:
506:
502:
498:
497:
496:
492:
488:
484:
483:WP:POLITICIAN
480:
476:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:
455:
452:
448:
444:
440:
439:
436:
432:
428:
424:
423:Changanassery
420:
419:vicar general
416:
412:
408:
405:
404:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
362:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
343:
342:
338:
334:
330:
329:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
302:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
282:
278:
274:
267:
263:
259:
256:
252:
248:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
217:Changanassery
214:
213:vicar general
210:
206:
202:
192:
188:
185:
182:
178:
174:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
142:
139:
138:Find sources:
134:
130:
125:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
64:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
762:
759:
741:
734:
715:
693:
667:
653:
637:
598:
593:
580:
568:
517:
457:
406:
303:
291:Doc Quintana
286:
261:
235:
204:
198:
186:
180:
172:
165:
159:
153:
147:
137:
50:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
407:Weak delete
163:free images
526:Xxanthippe
462:Xxanthippe
351:Xxanthippe
316:Xxanthippe
748:reasoning
742:Abductive
620:Radagast3
550:Radagast3
487:Radagast3
427:Radagast3
388:Radagast3
384:this list
370:Radagast3
273:• Gene93k
247:• Gene93k
650:Spaceman
570:Relisted
501:StAnselm
443:StAnselm
409:. Fails
347:Cardinal
333:StAnselm
221:StAnselm
124:View log
698:rescue.
694:Comment
581:JForget
518:Comment
479:WP:PROF
458:Comment
411:WP:PROF
304:Comment
211:and is
201:WP:PROF
169:WP refs
157:scholar
97:protect
92:history
735:Delete
721:Silver
702:Silver
677:Silver
672:rescue
287:Delete
141:Google
101:delete
51:Xymmax
726:seren
707:seren
682:seren
668:Note:
656:Spiff
605:talk
544:fact.
386:. --
368:. --
184:JSTOR
145:books
118:views
110:watch
106:links
16:<
716:Keep
647:-- —
638:Note
624:talk
594:Keep
554:talk
530:talk
505:talk
491:talk
481:and
466:talk
447:talk
431:talk
417:and
392:talk
374:talk
366:here
355:talk
337:talk
320:talk
295:talk
277:talk
262:Note
251:talk
236:Note
225:talk
177:FENS
151:news
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
600:DGG
421:of
271:--
245:--
215:of
191:TWL
126:•
122:– (
674:.
644:.
626:)
607:)
556:)
532:)
507:)
493:)
468:)
449:)
433:)
394:)
376:)
361:.
357:)
339:)
322:)
297:)
279:)
268:.
253:)
242:.
227:)
205:is
171:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
750:)
746:(
622:(
603:(
552:(
536:.
528:(
503:(
489:(
472:.
464:(
445:(
429:(
390:(
372:(
353:(
335:(
326:.
318:(
293:(
275:(
249:(
223:(
195:)
187:·
181:·
173:·
166:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
143:(
135:(
132:)
120:)
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.