336:
A number of editors contributing to this discussion appear to be missing the point. Knowledge (XXG) is not the place for ANYONE - be they Hindu, Buddhist or of any other faith - to post their points of view. This is an encyclopedia, not a debating chamber, and wiki policy is that articles shall not
367:
Quote: "Knowledge (XXG) is not the place for ANYONE - be they Hindu, Buddhist or of any other faith - to post their points of view. This is an encyclopedia, not a debating chamber, and wiki policy is that articles shall not express points of view, save only by second-hand attribution." Response:
124:
I am really not sure about this one. It may be a very legitimate article. However, it seems to be wildly (fanatically, even) POV, and I think it COULD be a recreation of something, judging by the creation comment of the author. Also, the author is a suspected sockpuppet. Very unsure what is to be
138:- it's not at all clear what the article is trying to say, or what the content has to do with the title. I admit I don't know anything much about Buddhism or Hinduism, so there might be some validity to the content that I wasn't aware of. However, it looks to me like
368:
Yes, indeed it is an encyclopedia and because the topic is Lord Buddha from the Hindu viewpoint, it should be recorded in the encyclopedia rather than being deleted just because some fools want to hide Hindu viewpoints about Lord Buddha from the world.
220:
Hindus are entitled to their own beliefs! This whole argment started when Hindu articles kept getting deleted. Hindus are not allowed to post their views on
Knowledge (XXG) because they will only be deleted reguardless of any so-called
425:, where all the POV nonsense has been painstakingly edited out by some very hard-working editors and replaced with good scholarly material. The quality of that article is, in my opinion, the strongest argument for deleting this one.
180:
302:
It isn't that well sourced, especially for such a controversial topic. Not only that, should they be the same sources as were in the original article, then many agreed in the last debate that they were biased.
243:
The deletion proposition was issued by vandals who are very racist. they do not want Hindus to show their viewpoint. First vandals would not permit Hindus to post their viewpoints on the
117:
405:. An argument on the place of Buddha in Hinduism may have a place somewhere. However, this article, pushing its own POV starting with the unjustified name, is just propaganda.
197:
254:
224:
251:
page and even the Hindu viewpoints in that were mostly deleted. Now this is proposed for deletion. Then where should Hindus post their viewpoints?
90:
85:
94:
236:
266:
77:
17:
371:
The Buddha talked about the
Sanatan Dharam and the Arya Dharam and Nirvan. Do you neo-Buddhists have any explainations for that?
156:
422:
248:
160:
446:
36:
429:
409:
395:
391:: We are not here to debate the nature of Buddha. We are here to decide whether this article should be deleted.
361:
341:
325:
307:
294:
213:
187:
171:
146:
129:
59:
445:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
232:
143:
81:
262:
228:
338:
288:
73:
65:
183:, created by the same user for much the same reason), so the debate there has relevance to this one.
380:
205:
53:
258:
358:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
283:
164:
278:
392:
304:
126:
50:
426:
352:
184:
167:, is a fanatic pov-pusher, who quite often attempts to recreate deleted articles.--
111:
179:. This article also bears a great deal of resemblance to a recently deleted one (
316:
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
322:
181:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Brahmin
Contributions to Other Religions
168:
406:
351:
Per
Orpheus, Aldux and Anthony. Created by sock of blocked-pov pusher.
244:
374:
This article has to remain to educate people on the Hindu Buddha!
439:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
337:
express points of view, save only by second-hand attribution.--
155:. This is a mischievious attempt to recreate the POVFORK
107:
103:
99:
321:
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
449:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
379:The above unsigned comments were added by
196:: This debate has been included in the
421:. That "somewhere", specifically, is
163:. The creator, before using the name
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
277:- Seems to be well sourced with
198:list of India-related deletions
157:Buddha From a Hindu Perspective
1:
430:00:40, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
423:Buddha as an Avatar of Vishnu
410:18:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
396:16:52, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
362:11:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
342:17:27, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
326:12:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
249:Buddha as an Avatar of Vishnu
161:Buddha as an Avatar of Vishnu
60:19:18, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
308:16:21, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
295:00:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
214:16:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
188:00:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
172:22:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
147:20:43, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
130:20:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
466:
142:under CSD G1 (nonsense).
442:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
247:page so I designed the
257:comment was added by
227:comment was added by
159:, now a redirect to
144:Walton monarchist89
74:Mahavishnu Gautama
66:Mahavishnu Gautama
383:
328:
270:
240:
216:
201:
457:
444:
378:
339:Anthony.bradbury
320:
317:
291:
286:
279:reliable sources
252:
222:
212:
210:
202:
192:
115:
97:
56:
34:
465:
464:
460:
459:
458:
456:
455:
454:
453:
447:deletion review
440:
315:
289:
284:
253:—The preceding
223:—The preceding
206:
204:
165:User:Maleabroad
125:done about it.
88:
72:
69:
54:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
463:
461:
452:
451:
435:
434:
433:
432:
413:
412:
399:
398:
385:
384:
381:136.159.32.177
365:
364:
345:
344:
330:
329:
319:
311:
310:
297:
229:136.159.32.179
221:"discussions."
218:
217:
190:
174:
151:Without doubt
149:
122:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
462:
450:
448:
443:
437:
436:
431:
428:
424:
420:
417:
416:
415:
414:
411:
408:
404:
401:
400:
397:
394:
390:
387:
386:
382:
377:
376:
375:
372:
369:
363:
360:
359:
356:
355:
350:
349:Speedy Delete
347:
346:
343:
340:
335:
332:
331:
327:
324:
318:
313:
312:
309:
306:
301:
298:
296:
293:
292:
287:
280:
276:
273:
272:
271:
268:
264:
260:
259:HinduDefender
256:
250:
246:
241:
238:
234:
230:
226:
215:
211:
209:
199:
195:
191:
189:
186:
182:
178:
177:Speedy Delete
175:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
153:Speedy Delete
150:
148:
145:
141:
140:speedy delete
137:
134:
133:
132:
131:
128:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
57:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
441:
438:
418:
402:
388:
373:
370:
366:
357:
353:
348:
333:
314:
299:
282:
274:
242:
219:
207:
193:
176:
152:
139:
135:
123:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
208:⇒ bsnowball
393:J Milburn
305:J Milburn
127:J Milburn
300:Comment:
267:contribs
255:unsigned
237:contribs
225:unsigned
118:View log
427:Orpheus
419:Comment
389:Comment
245:Gautama
185:Orpheus
91:protect
86:history
403:Delete
334:Delete
136:Delete
95:delete
46:delete
354:Gizza
323:Quarl
169:Aldux
112:views
104:watch
100:links
55:desat
16:<
285:Baka
275:Keep
263:talk
233:talk
203:--
194:Note
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
51:Core
48:. --
407:Imc
290:man
200:.
116:– (
269:).
265:•
239:).
235:•
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
281:.
261:(
231:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.