214:
trying to find as many teams as possible and sometimes getting a little overenthusiastic in their endeavours. The same person on the forum also gives results for games between
Manchuria and China, which strikes me (and apparently whoever the author who used those results to create this article) as
343:, as I recall, was a puppet of Imperial Japan. "International games" would be a sham. However, we are building a not paper encylopedia, and this information should be somewhere. Best place I can think of would be a section of Manchukuo.
362:-γthe article has notability as it illustrates one of a number of failed efforts by Manchukuo to obtain international recognition. I agree that more references should be added, even if only in Japanese or Chinese. --
92:
87:
96:
79:
125:
302:
83:
174:
under the proviso that references are found. Undoubtedly these three games were played so there must be mention of it out there somewhere.
392:
371:
354:
331:
316:
293:
266:
252:
238:
224:
201:
183:
165:
145:
61:
75:
67:
17:
153:
312:
207:
407:
307:. However, the existence of the games isn't enough to make the team notable, so I'd probably side with deletion.
36:
406:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
388:
349:
308:
234:
179:
211:
290:
192:
Definitely someone needs to look in
Chinese and Japanese before we conclude that there are no references.
344:
328:
248:
197:
384:
262:
230:
229:
Well certainly, if no references can be found, it has to go - but it would be best to make sure.
220:
206:
In normal circumstamces I would agree with you, however, this seems to have come about, like the
175:
161:
141:
58:
287:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
379:
not notable in its own. Significant content in the article (if any) can be merged into the
367:
244:
193:
258:
216:
157:
137:
51:
301:. Not a hoax; there is reference to Japan playing games in Manchuria at these times:
215:
highly unlikely to have happened, which then brings all the results into question.
113:
133:
305:
363:
380:
340:
243:
Agreed, it could turn out be a hoax. No reason not to check first though.
48:. Interesting topic, though needs reliable sources before it is recreated.
339:
Hmmm. This seems to be a sham national team from a fabricated nation.
400:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
120:
109:
105:
101:
257:Ah, I see what you mean now, I'm being a bit dense
156:'s list of association football related deletions.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
410:). No further edits should be made to this page.
304:. There is also this football statistics site:
136:. Only cited website makes no mention of team
8:
152:Note: This discussion has been included in
7:
210:article, as a result of people from
24:
76:Manchuria national football team
68:Manchuria national football team
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
427:
403:Please do not modify it.
393:08:59, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
372:15:25, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
355:00:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
332:11:44, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
317:03:07, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
294:22:41, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
267:22:57, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
253:22:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
239:22:32, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
225:22:25, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
202:22:19, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
184:22:11, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
166:22:06, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
146:22:05, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
62:19:23, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
154:WikiProject Football
309:Fences and windows
44:The result was
168:
418:
405:
352:
347:
151:
123:
117:
99:
60:
54:
34:
426:
425:
421:
420:
419:
417:
416:
415:
414:
408:deletion review
401:
350:
345:
324:- Not notable.
286:- non-notable.
119:
90:
74:
71:
52:
49:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
424:
422:
413:
412:
396:
395:
374:
357:
337:Merge/redirect
334:
319:
296:
280:
279:
278:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
187:
186:
169:
130:
129:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
423:
411:
409:
404:
398:
397:
394:
390:
386:
382:
378:
375:
373:
369:
365:
361:
358:
356:
353:
348:
342:
338:
335:
333:
330:
327:
323:
320:
318:
314:
310:
306:
303:
300:
297:
295:
292:
289:
285:
282:
281:
268:
264:
260:
256:
255:
254:
250:
246:
242:
241:
240:
236:
232:
231:Bretonbanquet
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
213:
209:
205:
204:
203:
199:
195:
191:
190:
189:
188:
185:
181:
177:
176:Bretonbanquet
173:
170:
167:
163:
159:
155:
150:
149:
148:
147:
143:
139:
135:
127:
122:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
56:
55:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
402:
399:
376:
359:
336:
325:
321:
298:
283:
171:
131:
50:
45:
43:
31:
28:
383:article. --
326:John Sloan
245:Drawn Some
212:this forum
194:Drawn Some
381:Manchukuo
351:cierekim
341:Manchukuo
259:Stu.W UK
217:Stu.W UK
208:Shanghai
158:Stu.W UK
138:Stu.W UK
126:View log
53:SilkTork
299:Comment
291:Snowman
93:protect
88:history
385:Angelo
377:Delete
322:Delete
284:Delete
132:Fails
121:delete
97:delete
46:delete
364:MChew
288:Giant
124:) β (
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
389:talk
368:talk
360:Keep
346:Dloh
313:talk
263:talk
249:talk
235:talk
221:talk
198:talk
180:talk
172:Keep
162:talk
142:talk
134:WP:V
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
391:)
370:)
315:)
265:)
251:)
237:)
223:)
200:)
182:)
164:)
144:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
387:(
366:(
329:@
311:(
261:(
247:(
233:(
219:(
196:(
178:(
160:(
140:(
128:)
118:(
116:)
78:(
57:*
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.