320:
I doubt they are, but, even if they are, the content is not in-depth. That's one of the three requirements -- for there to be significant content on the topic. NPC is barely a paragraph with only a generic description. MoP is brief generic description and mostly not about the game(s). DE at least has
398:
I don't think it means much at all when the accompanying review is hardly a paragraph of PR information. They have not listed a single critical thing about the game. Perhaps they did have something more comprehensive internally, but we cannot
215:
261:, but it's only a single one. All the other sources in the article are unreliable or not in-depth. Lots of search hits otherwise, but none appear in-depth, mostly directory entries and generic descriptions. —
82:
136:
282:
422:
Plus even if a single source is about the game, it doesn't make the game itself notable. There are a lot of hidden gems out there, though I don't think this is one. --
189:
250:
77:
143:
321:
significant content and critical reception in the form of a review, although doesn't state who the author is nor can I find any editorial information, though
241:
Contested PROD with a claim for new sources. Non-notable video games/series. I cannot locate multiple reliable independent in-depth sources for
17:
109:
104:
456:
431:
416:
393:
379:
362:
337:
315:
298:
274:
61:
113:
221:
183:
258:
159:
96:
475:
40:
306:
What about museum of play and the national parenting center? Aren't these just as reliable as disovery education? -
165:
389:
311:
322:
171:
471:
427:
375:
358:
155:
36:
384:
What about the fact that NPC gave the game its seal of approval? Doesn't that make the game notable? -
254:
423:
371:
454:
57:
412:
385:
333:
307:
294:
270:
201:
195:
246:
370:
as it doesn't look like anybody cares enough about these games to write sources about them. --
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
470:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
354:
100:
444:
242:
448:
53:
177:
405:
326:
287:
263:
400:
350:
207:
130:
92:
67:
447:. Hellknowz is right, there aren't multiple, reliable sources to be found.
464:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
227:
353:, and the new sources discovered aren't convincing enough.
349:
per my argument last time. Article does not appear to be
233:
126:
122:
118:
249:. Does not appear that the coverage has changed since
83:Articles for deletion/Mango Plumo (2nd nomination)
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
478:). No further edits should be made to this page.
283:list of Video games-related deletion discussions
324:probably implies they have decent standards. —
257:. The only new source that is probably RS is
8:
281:Note: This debate has been included in the
280:
403:this without any published material. —
75:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
74:
24:
78:Articles for deletion/Mango Plumo
1:
457:12:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
432:23:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
417:22:00, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
394:21:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
380:04:21, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
363:03:54, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
338:21:44, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
316:21:08, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
299:14:27, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
275:14:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
62:00:13, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
495:
467:Please do not modify it.
253:. No meaningful hits in
153:Find video game sources:
32:Please do not modify it.
73:AfDs for this article:
259:Discovery Education
415:
336:
301:
297:
273:
196:free news sources
486:
469:
451:
408:
404:
329:
325:
290:
286:
266:
262:
255:custom RS search
236:
146:
134:
116:
34:
494:
493:
489:
488:
487:
485:
484:
483:
482:
476:deletion review
465:
449:
443:, doesn't meet
406:
327:
288:
264:
151:
142:
107:
91:
88:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
492:
490:
481:
480:
460:
459:
438:
437:
436:
435:
434:
386:CharlieBrown25
382:
365:
343:
342:
341:
340:
308:CharlieBrown25
303:
302:
239:
238:
148:
87:
86:
85:
80:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
491:
479:
477:
473:
468:
462:
461:
458:
455:
452:
446:
442:
439:
433:
429:
425:
421:
420:
418:
414:
410:
402:
397:
396:
395:
391:
387:
383:
381:
377:
373:
369:
366:
364:
360:
356:
352:
348:
345:
344:
339:
335:
331:
323:
319:
318:
317:
313:
309:
305:
304:
300:
296:
292:
284:
279:
278:
277:
276:
272:
268:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
214:
211:
210:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
156:"Mango Plumo"
154:
149:
145:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
466:
463:
440:
367:
346:
240:
230:
224:
218:
216:WP reference
212:
208:
204:
198:
192:
186:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
139:
49:
47:
31:
28:
424:Kiyoshiendo
372:Kiyoshiendo
368:Weak delete
355:AdrianGamer
190:free images
93:Mango Plumo
68:Mango Plumo
450:soetermans
245:, such as
166:newspapers
54:Malcolmxl5
472:talk page
234:WPVG/Talk
37:talk page
474:or in a
251:last AfD
247:WP:VG/RS
137:View log
39:or in a
351:notable
178:scholar
110:protect
105:history
445:WP:GNG
441:Delete
401:verify
347:Delete
243:WP:GNG
114:delete
50:delete
409:KNOWZ
330:KNOWZ
291:KNOWZ
267:KNOWZ
228:VG/RL
222:VG/RS
184:JSTOR
172:books
144:Stats
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
428:talk
413:TALK
407:HELL
390:talk
376:talk
359:talk
334:TALK
328:HELL
312:talk
295:TALK
289:HELL
285:. —
271:TALK
265:HELL
160:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
58:talk
209:NYT
202:TWL
135:– (
52:.
453:.
430:)
419:\
392:)
378:)
361:)
314:)
158:–
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
60:)
426:(
411:▎
388:(
374:(
357:(
332:▎
310:(
293:▎
269:▎
237:)
231:·
225:·
219:·
213:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
150:(
147:)
140:·
133:)
95:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.