337:: It's kind of you to say that but I think that other editors need to pitch in to expand this article. It now has an "undue" tag on it and it's hard to argue that far too much of the article is focused on his regulatory issues. In fact, I believe I raised that point myself on the talk page a while ago. Lamentably, the man himself or a proxy appeared, and behaved in such a way as to make it hard to focus on content. There's a lot on his career that needs to be added. I think that the best source for that is the news articles that are out there, and not the ones cherry picked by Asensio for his website. Frankly I found dealing with this article exhausting, and would much prefer if other editors weighed in, particularly in expanding. --
385:: I can only mirror JohnnyB's sentiments. When I started the article almost five years ago, I knew it would be controversial, but I didn't expect it to undergo constant total POV-based rewrites. The article has been deleted once before via OTRS action. Having to waste time on this current AfD, despite the obvious outcome, just adds to the growing feeling that editing any BLP is an exercise in futility. However, I do appreciate the effort of all those who strive to improve the article.
225:. A well known and notable activist and author, with massive coverage in the media. The nomination seems to be based on a version of the article that was in place for less than a day, introduced by a party related to the article's subject matter. When a bio is written like an advertisement by a COI editor, it needs to be
288:. I completely understand why Cameron Scott nominated the article, it was in awful shape, but he should have either looked at the article history or done a quick search on the author's name. The notability is pretty clearly established in the article in its current form. --
315:
if JohnnyB is willing to keep after it for NPOV. Cameron is probably right that the subject is now “non-notable,” as there appears to be little independent material published about him in recent years. But the subject is notable for past
159:
358:- I'm not sure how much help I will be in expansion, but I will keep this article on my watchlist for any further trouble from IPs or new accounts. I'll try to expand it if I can. --
120:
153:
208:. Subject is a well-known short-seller, the subject of voluminous press coverage in the 1990s and author of a book. The article requires expansion.--
93:
88:
97:
253:
80:
17:
249:
was the actual "last good version" before the COI editor changed it into an advertisement, the point where
Cameron ran across it. ←
174:
141:
413:
36:
135:
412:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
394:
377:
346:
325:
307:
276:
257:
238:
217:
199:
62:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
131:
195:
84:
181:
57:
342:
213:
317:
321:
167:
250:
191:
147:
76:
68:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
285:
49:
389:
372:
338:
302:
233:
209:
114:
386:
360:
290:
266:
230:
406:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
265:. The New York Times article easily proves notability. --
247:
110:
106:
102:
166:
180:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
416:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
190:Fails WP:BIO - non-notable fund manager.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
395:23:30, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
378:23:25, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
347:19:20, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
326:17:59, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
308:16:54, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
277:14:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
258:14:18, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
239:13:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
218:11:40, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
200:09:22, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
63:01:24, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
433:
409:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
77:Manuel P. Asensio
69:Manuel P. Asensio
424:
411:
375:
369:
366:
363:
305:
299:
296:
293:
273:
272:
185:
184:
170:
118:
100:
60:
54:
34:
432:
431:
427:
426:
425:
423:
422:
421:
420:
414:deletion review
407:
392:
373:
367:
364:
361:
303:
297:
294:
291:
270:
268:
246:. This version
236:
229:, not deleted.
127:
91:
75:
72:
58:
50:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
430:
428:
419:
418:
402:
401:
400:
399:
398:
397:
390:
380:
350:
349:
329:
328:
310:
279:
260:
241:
234:
220:
188:
187:
124:
71:
66:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
429:
417:
415:
410:
404:
403:
396:
393:
388:
384:
381:
379:
376:
371:
370:
357:
354:
353:
352:
351:
348:
344:
340:
336:
333:
332:
331:
330:
327:
323:
319:
314:
311:
309:
306:
301:
300:
287:
283:
280:
278:
275:
274:
264:
261:
259:
255:
252:
251:Baseball Bugs
248:
245:
242:
240:
237:
232:
228:
224:
221:
219:
215:
211:
207:
204:
203:
202:
201:
197:
193:
192:Cameron Scott
183:
179:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
133:
130:
129:Find sources:
125:
122:
116:
112:
108:
104:
99:
95:
90:
86:
82:
78:
74:
73:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
55:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
408:
405:
382:
359:
355:
334:
312:
289:
281:
267:
262:
243:
226:
222:
205:
189:
177:
171:
163:
156:
150:
144:
138:
128:
51:
45:
43:
31:
28:
316:coverage.--
154:free images
339:JohnnyB256
210:JohnnyB256
318:Wiki-nika
121:View log
383:Comment
356:Comment
335:Comment
286:WP:SNOW
254:carrots
160:WP refs
148:scholar
94:protect
89:history
284:- Per
132:Google
98:delete
387:Owen×
231:Owen×
227:fixed
175:JSTOR
136:books
115:views
107:watch
103:links
16:<
343:talk
322:talk
313:Keep
282:Keep
269:Neil
263:Keep
244:Keep
223:Keep
214:talk
206:Keep
196:talk
168:FENS
142:news
111:logs
85:talk
81:edit
46:keep
182:TWL
119:– (
56:|
52:Tan
365:am
362:At
345:)
324:)
295:am
292:At
256:→
216:)
198:)
162:)
113:|
109:|
105:|
101:|
96:|
92:|
87:|
83:|
59:39
48:.
391:☎
374:頭
368:a
341:(
320:(
304:頭
298:a
271:N
235:☎
212:(
194:(
186:)
178:·
172:·
164:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
139:·
134:(
126:(
123:)
117:)
79:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.