303:. The entire article reeks as promotion and the subject's notability is questionable at best. He leads a small company that hasn't made much of an indent on the world, and the greatest claim to fame is the envelopes for the Oscars. That gave him passing coverage leading up to the Oscars (anything tangentially related to Oscars gets a little bit of coverage these days). But there wasn't the in-depth coverage we need to show enduring notability.
212:
The best practice with such articles is to remove them entirely. We do not prohibit paid editing, but we do prohibit paid editing like this, that reflects the financial conflict of interest. If an editor without COI wants to do a proper job of it, it can be started over.
208:
This article, written by a now-blocked COI editor who is almost certainly a paid editor, is in my opinion too promotional to rewrite by normal editing, and is at in addition of such borderline notability that it is not worth the total rewriting that would be necessary.
177:
272:
252:
232:
130:
357:
You're misreading that guideline. Our notability guidelines are created to roughly judge which topics have enduring notability. My wording was specifically referring to
171:
137:
373:
315:
103:
98:
17:
107:
90:
192:
159:
426:
40:
153:
368:
310:
405:
379:
352:
321:
284:
264:
244:
224:
149:
72:
94:
422:
402:
295:
The nomination sums up the issues at hand and I would go further to argue that the subject doesn't meet
36:
199:
358:
86:
78:
185:
391:
363:
305:
334:
280:
260:
240:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
421:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
165:
65:
330:
300:
348:
296:
220:
276:
256:
236:
124:
333:. However, the above comment referencing "enduring notability" concerns me, as
58:
338:
394:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
329:
I mostly agree that this is a purely promotional article, and should get
215:
361:, the policy which differentiates enduring vs. temporary notability.
415:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
120:
116:
112:
184:
401:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
273:
198:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
429:). No further edits should be made to this page.
253:list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions
233:list of California-related deletion discussions
8:
271:Note: This debate has been included in the
251:Note: This debate has been included in the
231:Note: This debate has been included in the
270:
250:
230:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
335:notability is not temporary
446:
406:01:32, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
380:18:22, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
353:17:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
322:14:58, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
285:00:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
265:00:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
245:00:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
225:00:05, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
73:06:04, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
418:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
349:I'm no IP, talk to me!
48:The result was
408:
287:
267:
247:
56:
437:
420:
400:
396:
376:
371:
366:
345:
344:
318:
313:
308:
203:
202:
188:
140:
128:
110:
70:
63:
54:
34:
445:
444:
440:
439:
438:
436:
435:
434:
433:
427:deletion review
416:
389:
374:
369:
364:
340:
339:
316:
311:
306:
145:
136:
101:
85:
82:
66:
59:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
443:
441:
432:
431:
411:
410:
409:
398:
397:
386:
385:
384:
383:
382:
324:
289:
288:
268:
248:
206:
205:
142:
87:Marc Friedland
81:
79:Marc Friedland
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
442:
430:
428:
424:
419:
413:
412:
407:
404:
399:
395:
393:
388:
387:
381:
378:
377:
372:
367:
360:
356:
355:
354:
350:
346:
343:
336:
332:
328:
325:
323:
320:
319:
314:
309:
302:
298:
294:
291:
290:
286:
282:
278:
274:
269:
266:
262:
258:
254:
249:
246:
242:
238:
234:
229:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
217:
210:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
139:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
71:
69:
64:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
417:
414:
403:NorthAmerica
390:
362:
341:
326:
304:
292:
214:
211:
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
133:
67:
60:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
172:free images
359:WP:NOTNEWS
423:talk page
331:blowed-up
277:• Gene93k
257:• Gene93k
237:• Gene93k
55:→ Call me
37:talk page
425:or in a
392:Relisted
131:View log
39:or in a
327:comment
178:WP refs
166:scholar
104:protect
99:history
301:WP:BIO
293:Delete
150:Google
108:delete
50:delete
375:Space
342:78.26
317:Space
221:talk
193:JSTOR
154:books
138:Stats
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
370:From
365:Them
312:From
307:Them
297:WP:N
281:talk
261:talk
241:talk
186:FENS
160:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
61:Hahc
337:.
299:or
216:DGG
200:TWL
129:– (
351:)
283:)
275:.
263:)
255:.
243:)
235:.
223:)
180:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
68:21
52:.
347:(
279:(
259:(
239:(
219:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
134:·
127:)
89:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.