395:
231:
article for this criterion; an article that is blatant advertising should have inappropriate content as well."- i imagine that there is "innapropriate content" on this page that qualifies it for deletion....could someone please cite an example for me in my article so that i can make some choices about editing?
422:. This article is looking much better now. It still needs a lot of work, but by now I'm pretty much convinced that the Adaptors Company is notable. I'm closing this as a withdrawn nomination -- yes, I realize other people voted delete, but those "delete" votes were for a prior version of the article.
230:
Blatant advertising is defined by Wiki as: "Pages which exclusively promote a company, product, group, service, or person and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten to become encyclopedic. Note that simply having a company, product, group, service, or person as its subject does not qualify an
182:
Sorry.....i've realized that i should have used the sandbox to see how this stuff would look as a wiki page......not actually submitting it...yes, three times, to see how it would look and , "oh gee.....it got deleted again!???! what the heck??? well, i guess i'll change some stuff around and try
240:
okay, i've made some edits in an effort to make the article look less like an advertisement. this included removing the external link to the margolis brown company website as well as removing information related to the touring history of their ensemble......any feedback would be much appreciated!!
301:
The three newspaper articles are DIRECTLY about
Margolis Brown Co.... they are reviews of their theatrical productions that include interviews with the artists, chronology of their training and past artistic experience as well as mention of their conceptual approach to creation. The "Movement for
357:
thanks, i'll plan on using that time to get something accomplished that would help. i'll search out some other verifiable sources...adding citations to articles of a similar nature....etc. do you have any suggestions? i realize the article looks pretty rough and bare naked now....but i suppose
160:
Hi, I'm trying not to sound promotional with this stuff....i want to build a clear page that will illucidate the lineage left behind by the great theatre master etienne decroux.......obviously all of the material that i have gathered that is relevant to put on the page is from the typical laundry
389:
but needs rewrite. Internationally-touring performance art group really says it all. Press-releasy article still asserts notability so an A7 deletion was out of bounds. (G11 is standard for PR writing that appears to come from someplace else, though.) Sourceable through reviews in the
399:
161:
list of accomplishments that artists give to news paper reporters....it wouldn't do to try to describe a theatre show that is reviewed in those articles, or the training summary in the
Allworth Press book...so i thought it best to use "general information" about the Adaptors Co.
333:
thank you, i will work to give notability by putting this article into context with others of a similar nature through citations, etc. is there a specific period of time that this debate will continue for before a decision for deletion/validity is made?
358:
that information that is verifiable and as you say "notable" is better than content that looks promotional or "random." i am going to go to bed now- thanks for your input and i look forward to any other suggestions you may have.
302:
Actor's" Book is an academic text....Kari
Margolis authored the chapter on "Schools of Thought" in physical theatre...specifically dealing with the theatre ensemble's training methods. a good read. your thoughts?
218:. Advertising, and meets at least two of the three speedy criteria it's been deleted under. Take your pick. By the way, could one person use the account so we don't get a split-personality thing going on? Thanks.
403:
406:(mainly Twin Cities during the time they were based there). Seems to be reasonably notable as an arts group, too bad they don't know how to write a Knowledge (XXG) article that doesn't get speedied. --
173:
If it were only recreated twice /w the creations being spread out I would'nt say so, But THREE TIMES!?! on the SAME DAY?!?! Especially since wikipedia is not an advertising service.
86:
81:
113:
48:, nomination withdrawn. Yes, I realize there were delete votes, but they were for a prior revision, and the article has been thoroughly rewritten since. Non-admin closure.
90:
73:
316:
in you that these sources truly are valid, but I'll wait and see what others think. I can't withdraw since others have voted delete, however, and I'm still not
196:...to help illustrate its failings? BTW, there's more than one person working on perfecting this page, which should help explain the frequency of updates.
77:
17:
429:
414:
379:
362:
351:
338:
327:
306:
293:
266:
245:
235:
224:
209:
200:
187:
177:
165:
153:
127:
55:
69:
61:
444:
36:
272:
ok, I've cited three newspaper articles and a book published by
Allworth press as sources...is this sufficient??
443:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
369:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
193:
192:
Could someone perhaps compare/contrast this article with another of similar content...say, this one:
423:
373:
359:
345:
335:
321:
303:
287:
260:
242:
232:
206:
197:
184:
162:
147:
121:
49:
411:
174:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
391:
313:
252:
256:
407:
220:
107:
120:
Non-notable corporation, reads as promotion. Seems to have been speedied before.
205:
hi, erik, thanks for the reference to
Furious Theatre....thats a good point.
286:
about
Margolis Brown Company or do they just mention it briefly?
437:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
146:
Downgrade to weak-delete, some notability cracking through.
183:
it again." i'm trying to get it right this time.......
138:
103:
99:
95:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
368:Okay. If you have anything else please move it to
447:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
372:so this discussion doesn't get clogged up.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
402:(a full profile and history), and
344:Seven days is the default length.
24:
142:, as (in order) G11, G12 and A7.
70:Margolis Brown Adaptors Company
62:Margolis Brown Adaptors Company
282:better, but are those sources
1:
320:convinced of the notability.
464:
430:20:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
216:Delete and salt thoroughly
136:. In fact it was speedied
56:20:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
415:12:26, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
380:04:56, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
363:04:52, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
352:04:44, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
339:04:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
328:04:33, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
307:04:29, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
294:04:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
267:04:00, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
246:03:58, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
236:03:34, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
225:03:24, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
210:03:20, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
201:03:14, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
188:03:06, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
178:03:01, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
166:02:54, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
154:02:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
128:02:38, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
440:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
194:Furious Theatre Company
259:it and I'll withdraw.
255:. Add some sources to
144:I recommend salting.
455:
442:
426:
425:Ten Pound Hammer
376:
375:Ten Pound Hammer
348:
347:Ten Pound Hammer
324:
323:Ten Pound Hammer
290:
289:Ten Pound Hammer
263:
262:Ten Pound Hammer
150:
149:Ten Pound Hammer
124:
123:Ten Pound Hammer
111:
93:
52:
51:Ten Pound Hammer
34:
463:
462:
458:
457:
456:
454:
453:
452:
451:
445:deletion review
438:
424:
400:Washington Post
396:Philly Inquirer
374:
346:
322:
288:
261:
148:
122:
84:
68:
65:
50:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
461:
459:
450:
449:
433:
432:
417:
392:MSP City Paper
383:
382:
355:
354:
331:
330:
299:
298:
297:
296:
270:
269:
228:
227:
159:
157:
156:
118:
117:
64:
59:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
460:
448:
446:
441:
435:
434:
431:
427:
421:
418:
416:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
388:
385:
384:
381:
377:
371:
367:
366:
365:
364:
361:
353:
349:
343:
342:
341:
340:
337:
329:
325:
319:
315:
312:I'm assuming
311:
310:
309:
308:
305:
295:
291:
285:
281:
277:
276:
275:
274:
273:
268:
264:
258:
254:
250:
249:
248:
247:
244:
238:
237:
234:
226:
223:
222:
217:
214:
213:
212:
211:
208:
203:
202:
199:
195:
190:
189:
186:
180:
179:
176:
172:
168:
167:
164:
155:
151:
145:
141:
140:
135:
132:
131:
130:
129:
125:
115:
109:
105:
101:
97:
92:
88:
83:
79:
75:
71:
67:
66:
63:
60:
58:
57:
53:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
439:
436:
419:
386:
370:my talk page
356:
332:
317:
300:
283:
279:
271:
251:Still fails
239:
229:
219:
215:
204:
191:
181:
175:James Luftan
170:
169:
158:
143:
137:
133:
119:
45:
43:
31:
28:
139:three times
314:good faith
278:That's a
408:Dhartung
360:Zena0727
336:Zena0727
304:Zena0727
284:directly
243:Zena0727
233:Zena0727
221:Hersfold
207:Zena0727
198:Zena0727
185:Zena0727
163:Zena0727
114:View log
420:Comment
134:Comment
87:protect
82:history
280:little
257:verify
91:delete
318:fully
253:WP:RS
108:views
100:watch
96:links
16:<
412:Talk
404:more
387:Keep
171:Salt
104:logs
78:talk
74:edit
46:Keep
428:•
378:•
350:•
326:•
292:•
265:•
152:•
126:•
112:– (
54:•
410:|
398:,
394:,
106:|
102:|
98:|
94:|
89:|
85:|
80:|
76:|
116:)
110:)
72:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.