347:(available on UKPressOnline since 2000) might have something, but only one article from 2000 advocating his release comes up ... I only wish it was available for the 1990s because it could have some decent backup material. Nothing on the Guardian & Observer digital archive as stated. Times, Express & Mirror only have a fairly trivial story about his objection to the regulation prison haircut (from Feb 1995). I have found quite a long article called 'Barnsley Barney' from the 'In the Back' section of Private Eye (6th October 2000, page 27, column 3) - might that be a reasonable source to add?
216:
Although the first AfD's consensus was keep because of the links but I see nothing else significant and notable about him and at best, it was incidental coverage and nothing to suggest further improvement and solid independent notability (better mentioned elsewhere) and there's nothing more to say it
322:
without prejudice towards recreation. The sources undoubtedly exist to demonstrate notability—Barnsley was quite a significant figure in hardline circles, with a fair few notable people organising or attending "Free Mark
Barnsley" events—but he's a niche enough topic that he doesn't justify the
323:
effort it would take to dig out sources. "Without prejudice" as someone may come along and write a non-stub article one day. (Lack of coverage in the
Guardian and Telegraph means nothing in this context; this was the pre-Iraq era when the
185:
84:
275:
138:
179:
297:
79:
145:
218:
111:
106:
115:
356:
335:
311:
289:
266:
240:
63:
17:
98:
200:
254:
167:
375:
40:
306:
284:
235:
161:
352:
157:
61:
371:
225:
and searches at BBC, The
Guardian and The Telegraph found nothing. Notifying the only still active user
102:
36:
327:
would never print anything that showed Blair in a less-than-saintly light, while wouldn't expect the
207:
222:
301:
279:
230:
193:
94:
69:
348:
54:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
370:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
262:
173:
332:
226:
331:
to mention that people like this even exist, let alone report on their activities.) ‑
250:
132:
258:
364:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
255:
WP:Notability_(people)#People_notable_for_only_one_event
128:
124:
120:
192:
85:
Articles for deletion/Mark
Barnsley (2nd nomination)
276:
list of United
Kingdom-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
378:). No further edits should be made to this page.
217:seems; the best results my searches found were
206:
8:
296:Note: This debate has been included in the
274:Note: This debate has been included in the
298:list of People-related deletion discussions
295:
273:
77:
7:
80:Articles for deletion/Mark Barnsley
76:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
357:01:54, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
336:12:30, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
312:07:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
290:07:23, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
267:06:15, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
241:05:28, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
64:04:03, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
395:
367:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
343:: was hoping that the
75:AfDs for this article:
253:and thus falls under
314:
292:
386:
369:
309:
304:
287:
282:
238:
233:
211:
210:
196:
148:
136:
118:
57:
34:
394:
393:
389:
388:
387:
385:
384:
383:
382:
376:deletion review
365:
320:Grudging delete
307:
302:
285:
280:
236:
231:
153:
144:
109:
93:
90:
73:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
392:
390:
381:
380:
360:
359:
338:
316:
315:
303:SwisterTwister
293:
281:SwisterTwister
270:
269:
232:SwisterTwister
214:
213:
150:
89:
88:
87:
82:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
391:
379:
377:
373:
368:
362:
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
339:
337:
334:
330:
326:
321:
318:
317:
313:
310:
305:
299:
294:
291:
288:
283:
277:
272:
271:
268:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
239:
234:
228:
224:
220:
209:
205:
202:
199:
195:
191:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
166:
163:
159:
156:
155:Find sources:
151:
147:
143:
140:
134:
130:
126:
122:
117:
113:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:Mark Barnsley
92:
91:
86:
83:
81:
78:
71:
70:Mark Barnsley
68:
66:
65:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
366:
363:
349:RobinCarmody
345:Morning Star
344:
340:
328:
324:
319:
246:
215:
203:
197:
189:
182:
176:
170:
164:
154:
141:
56:Juliancolton
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
180:free images
333:iridescent
227:Iridescent
372:talk page
329:Telegraph
37:talk page
374:or in a
325:Guardian
139:View log
39:or in a
341:Comment
247:Delete.
186:WP refs
174:scholar
112:protect
107:history
259:Holdek
249:Lacks
158:Google
116:delete
50:delete
251:WP:IS
201:JSTOR
162:books
146:Stats
133:views
125:watch
121:links
52:. –
16:<
353:talk
308:talk
286:talk
263:talk
257:. --
237:talk
223:this
221:and
219:this
194:FENS
168:news
129:logs
103:talk
99:edit
208:TWL
137:– (
355:)
300:.
278:.
265:)
229:.
188:)
131:|
127:|
123:|
119:|
114:|
110:|
105:|
101:|
60:|
351:(
261:(
212:)
204:·
198:·
190:·
183:·
177:·
171:·
165:·
160:(
152:(
149:)
142:·
135:)
97:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.