341:
magician would. If the competition was notable I would have expected to have seen something in a national newspaper rather than a local newspaper that covers the area the subject is from. There are still no reliable sources to verify him being a notable musician or the fact the competition is
267:(the agency he belongs to). The realitydigital.com reference doesn't show that he has appeared on TV and the remainder of the references are for an online competition of very dubious notability. There is nothing in the article that is verifiable to show that he meets any of the criteria at
306:... is "Any biograhy", which allows "The person has received a notable award or honor, or has been often nominated for them". So, I can only address your statement "competition of very dubious notability", by pointing out that A)
301:
conclusive proof that a subject should not be included; conversely, meeting one or more does not guarantee that a subject should be included". Another of these additional criteria... one which precedes
289:, when the "topic of an article should be notable, or "worthy of notice"; that is, "significant, interesting, or unusual enough to deserve attention or to be recorded". Further
120:
183:(it's an autobiographical article) to have made TV appearances. There are no reliable sources to back up any claims in the article apart from the non-notable competition. --
206:
161:
He's made numerous TV appearance and won a magic competition, though I'm not sure how notable that competition is. I'd lean to the side of keep for now.
232:
as I have just removed peacock, cleaned up, wikified, and sourced the article. His television appearances and award have been verified.
87:
82:
91:
17:
74:
218:
372:
36:
327:
241:
371:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
166:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
315:
303:
290:
268:
140:
351:
332:
280:
246:
223:
192:
170:
152:
56:
320:
234:
78:
162:
294:
286:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
213:
347:
276:
188:
148:
70:
62:
128:
127:
Non-notable entertainer. No reliable sources to show why this person is notable. Fails
256:
136:
132:
307:
50:
108:
343:
272:
184:
144:
259:, the reliable sources need to be "independent of the subject"—that rules
311:
337:
Being a magician doesn't make a person "worthy of notice", but being a
264:
318:. I will continue to seek sources for his television performances.
365:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
260:
297:
that follow the caveat "Failure to meet these criteria is
115:
104:
100:
96:
316:
reliable secondary source independent of the subject
263:(a directory listing written by the subject) and
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
375:). No further edits should be made to this page.
285:I feel as a magician he meets that criteria of
8:
293:is only one of the "additional criteria" of
207:list of People-related deletion discussions
205:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
314:, and C) his win was verified in a
265:http://www.warble-entertainment.com
24:
143:. PROD removed without reason.
1:
308:The contest spanned the globe
352:06:01, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
333:19:15, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
281:09:01, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
247:08:35, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
57:01:48, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
224:19:31, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
193:13:27, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
171:13:13, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
153:12:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)
392:
261:http://www.uk-magic.co.uk
368:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
312:He won first place
44:The result was
226:
210:
383:
370:
323:
237:
216:
211:
201:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
391:
390:
386:
385:
384:
382:
381:
380:
379:
373:deletion review
366:
321:
235:
221:
214:
114:
85:
71:Mark Waddington
69:
66:
63:Mark Waddington
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
389:
387:
378:
377:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
269:WP:ENTERTAINER
250:
249:
227:
219:
198:
197:
196:
195:
174:
173:
163:Wildthing61476
141:WP:ENTERTAINER
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
388:
376:
374:
369:
363:
362:
353:
349:
345:
340:
336:
335:
334:
331:
330:
329:
325:
324:
317:
313:
309:
305:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
283:
282:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
254:
253:
252:
251:
248:
245:
244:
243:
239:
238:
231:
228:
225:
222:
217:
208:
204:
200:
199:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
177:
176:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
156:
155:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
367:
364:
338:
328:
326:
319:
298:
242:
240:
233:
229:
202:
180:
158:
126:
49:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
342:notable. --
295:WP:PEOPLE
287:WP:PEOPLE
159:Weak Keep
322:Schmidt,
236:Schmidt,
121:View log
339:notable
255:As per
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
304:WP:Ent
291:WP:Ent
215:treelo
181:claims
116:delete
92:delete
344:JD554
310:, B)
273:JD554
220:radda
185:JD554
145:JD554
129:WP:RS
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
348:talk
277:talk
271:. --
257:WP:N
230:Keep
203:Note
189:talk
167:talk
149:talk
139:and
137:WP:N
133:WP:V
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
299:not
212:--
209:.
179:He
350:)
279:)
191:)
169:)
151:)
135:,
131:,
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
346:(
275:(
187:(
165:(
147:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.