249:
case of
Cornerstone, their own corporate web site. However, none of these competitors' pages has been tagged for deletion. It would seem that resources such as newspapers, magazines and Vault.com are considered reliable resources for other companies, and I believe that standard should be consistently applied for Analysis Group and for Martha Samuelson.
221:
I agree that she has received coverage, but the sources cited only look good until you actually click through them. The top result is an obit for a different Martha
Samuelson. The remaining sources aren't exactly current; with the exception of a short BusinessWeek interview from 2002, most of those
248:
I looked up the references cited by the competitors to this firm, and have made an entry on the
Analysis Group discussion page to that effect. Their competitors in this industry list resources of similar quality, such as The San Jose Business Journal, Vault.com, a 10-K filing from 2005, and, in the
226:
by any means - if a mention in a NY Times article from 2005 fulfills the requirement, then so be it. However, I don't think that's in the spirit of the guideline. If we add every CEO to
Knowledge (XXG) that gave a single quote to a newspaper, then we'd be overwhelmed with superfluous bio's. And
195:
This is the CEO of a 400+ person company. She has been cited in reliable secondary sources such as
Business Week and The New York Times. If Business Week and The New York Times are not considered legitimate secondary references, please explain specifically which references WOULD be considered
174:. Long-time CEO of a notable company (that is being simultaneously nominated for deletion), often mentioned by (reliable secondary) sources in connection with her management of and work for the company, and sometimes independently as an expert and commentator.
175:
129:
285:- The IP address of this user upon using nslookup resolves to "Analysis_Group.demarc.cogentco.com" which is a Conflict of Interest. I suggest the closer bears in this in mind -
317:
if
Analysis Group is deleted - not individually notable, no sources can be found, 969 google hits for name and the one reliable source refers to Analysis Group -
227:
some might argue that the 400 person company she's running (full disclosure: I've nominated that article for deletion as well) isn't notable, either.
96:
91:
100:
264:
17:
83:
222:
contain single statements that she made in some press releases (and at least one requires paid access). I'm not an expert on
359:
36:
232:
144:
358:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
344:
326:
294:
272:
236:
211:
187:
166:
148:
65:
260:
207:
268:
228:
140:
183:
87:
162:
179:
250:
197:
342:
254:
201:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
309:
79:
71:
61:
335:
223:
137:
158:
57:
322:
305:
290:
157:, no indication that she's been recognized as notable by reliable independent sources.
339:
117:
50:
318:
286:
352:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
124:
113:
109:
105:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
362:). No further edits should be made to this page.
136:Article doesn't meet requirements listed under
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
345:19:59, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
327:00:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
295:00:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
273:15:00, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
237:14:39, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
212:22:18, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
188:14:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
167:18:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
149:16:14, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
66:20:53, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
379:
355:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
334:, barely notable per
275:
263:comment added by
229:BowChickaNeowNeow
214:
178:are your sources.
141:BowChickaNeowNeow
64:
370:
357:
258:
205:
127:
121:
103:
80:Martha Samuelson
72:Martha Samuelson
56:
53:
34:
378:
377:
373:
372:
371:
369:
368:
367:
366:
360:deletion review
353:
123:
94:
78:
75:
51:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
376:
374:
365:
364:
348:
347:
329:
306:Analysis Group
300:
299:
298:
297:
277:
276:
242:
241:
240:
239:
216:
215:
190:
169:
134:
133:
74:
69:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
375:
363:
361:
356:
350:
349:
346:
343:
341:
337:
333:
330:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
311:
307:
302:
301:
296:
292:
288:
284:
281:
280:
279:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
256:
252:
247:
244:
243:
238:
234:
230:
225:
220:
219:
218:
217:
213:
210:was added at
209:
203:
199:
194:
191:
189:
185:
181:
177:
173:
170:
168:
164:
160:
156:
153:
152:
151:
150:
146:
142:
139:
131:
126:
119:
115:
111:
107:
102:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:
73:
70:
68:
67:
63:
59:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
354:
351:
331:
314:
304:Redirect to
303:
282:
265:38.112.11.10
245:
196:legitimate.
192:
171:
154:
135:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
259:—Preceding
206:—Preceding
159:NawlinWiki
62:count/logs
332:Weak Keep
340:Sallicio
261:unsigned
180:Wikidemo
130:View log
310:WP:SALT
283:Comment
251:rgord01
208:comment
198:rgord01
97:protect
92:history
336:WP:BIO
315:Delete
224:WP:BIO
155:Delete
138:WP:BIO
125:delete
101:delete
246:Keep.
193:Keep.
128:) – (
118:views
110:watch
106:links
52:Jerry
16:<
338:. --
323:talk
319:Halo
308:and
291:talk
287:Halo
269:talk
255:talk
233:talk
202:talk
184:talk
176:here
172:Keep
163:talk
145:talk
114:logs
88:talk
84:edit
58:talk
46:Keep
313:or
257:)
204:)
325:)
293:)
271:)
235:)
186:)
165:)
147:)
116:|
112:|
108:|
104:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
60:¤
48:.
321:(
289:(
267:(
253:(
231:(
200:(
182:(
161:(
143:(
132:)
122:(
120:)
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.