461:
trivial mention" (these sites took the time to prepare, submit to editorial, and publish an entire article dedicated to the topic) "but it need not be the main topic of the source material" (well, it is anyway, so that's a bonus, I guess). My impression is that you're importing a separate and higher standard of "significant coverage" than that expressly defined at
460:
definition of significant coverage is that "the sources address the subject directly" (headline contains subject name), "in detail" (many sources contain details of creators and budget), "and no original research is necessary to extract the content" (unarguably the case here). It is "more than a
205:- the "blogs" referenced are exactly the places you'd expect to see videogaming news of this kind. The reason blogs aren't normally accepted as sources is their lack of editorial oversight; Destructoid and PlayStation Official Magazine are both edited. There's also coverage on RockpaperShotgun (
392:; for a fan-film, this is substantial coverage. The cost of the movie and the coordination required to produce it is extraordinary. If this cannot pass notability, it's practically saying that fan films are inherently non-notable, and that's a road we do not want to take.
479:
Capsule reviews are mentioned at the more specific film notability guidelines, which is what both Panyd and I have linked to. It is my opinion that these small submissions are trivial, but I'm not going to kick up a huge fuss if that goes against the concensus.
272:"Significant coverage" means that sources address the subject directly in detail, and no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention but it need not be the main topic of the source material.
156:
274:
I'm not sure that your suggestion that multi-paragraph articles headlined with the name of the article subject can be described as "trivial mentions" is supported by policy or by past AfD results. -
325:
I am similarly unsure that 2-3 paragraphs stating that the film exists and that the author enjoyed it and a link to the film qualifies as significant coverage. Perhaps other editors will disagree.
413:- Notability, and the effort put into making something, are not in any way linked. Most of the links above are "Capsule reviews" which are are excluded in the notability criteria. Topless Robot
150:
117:
367:
90:
85:
94:
221:). Probably others too but that's four commercial sites with an editorial policy. The vast majority of fan films are certainly non notable, but this is one of the
77:
345:
295:
criteria are aimed at commercial release full-length features. Fan films would rarely pass this test - including the unarguably notable classic
171:
456:. There's no requirement for an article writer to have watched the film; it's sufficient merely that they saw fit to comment. As above, the
246:- none of the links provided above fall under the category of 'non-trivial coverage' and they're certainly not significant. Completely fails
138:
187:
Fanfilm of questionable notability - claims in the article appear overstated, and references are predominately primary sources or blogs.
81:
17:
132:
528:
507:
489:
474:
440:
401:
384:
357:
329:
316:
283:
254:
238:
196:
59:
370:
247:
128:
73:
65:
178:
543:
36:
417:
414:
214:
206:
542:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
470:
312:
279:
234:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
144:
299:- and given that this one is distributed exclusively via the internet a more appropriate critieria might be
192:
57:
485:
436:
524:
466:
380:
308:
275:
230:
164:
504:
292:
210:
353:
188:
50:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
516:
481:
432:
300:
416:
states that he hasn't watched all of the film (yet), and RockPaperShotgun's Kieron Gillon
424:
520:
397:
376:
303:
which it passes criterion 1 of. (And, of course, it passes the more important test at
225:
to clear the bar. Significant coverage in independent reliable sources means it clears
462:
457:
453:
304:
267:
226:
296:
222:
218:
349:
111:
291:- Sorry for the both-barrels commenting, but it's also worth mentioning that the
373:
326:
251:
393:
427:. It is verifiable at least, so if someone wants to briefly mention it in
428:
48:. Consensus seems to suggest that the topic is adequately notable. –
536:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
465:, and if you are then it doesn't reflect current policy. -
107:
103:
99:
163:
419:claims he doesn't even intent to watch it. This is
177:
452:- The words "capsule review" aren't mentioned at
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
546:). No further edits should be made to this page.
503:– Looks like plenty of reliable sourcing here.
366:: Per the sources listed by DustFormsWords and
346:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
344:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
515:Has good sources. Especially this
24:
74:Metal Gear Solid: Philanthropy
66:Metal Gear Solid: Philanthropy
1:
248:notability criteria for films
60:01:47, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
529:06:11, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
508:00:52, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
490:10:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)
475:23:11, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
441:11:16, 7 November 2009 (UTC)
402:18:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
385:13:53, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
358:13:04, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
330:07:51, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
317:07:48, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
284:07:46, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
255:07:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
239:05:29, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
197:05:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
563:
431:or somesuch, that's fine.
539:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
213:), Topless Robot (
44:The result was
360:
554:
541:
340:
182:
181:
167:
115:
97:
53:
34:
562:
561:
557:
556:
555:
553:
552:
551:
550:
544:deletion review
537:
217:) and Gamespy (
124:
88:
72:
69:
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
560:
558:
549:
548:
532:
531:
510:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
467:DustFormsWords
444:
443:
404:
387:
361:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
332:
320:
319:
309:DustFormsWords
289:Second Comment
286:
276:DustFormsWords
258:
257:
241:
231:DustFormsWords
185:
184:
121:
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
559:
547:
545:
540:
534:
533:
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
511:
509:
506:
502:
499:
498:
491:
487:
483:
478:
477:
476:
472:
468:
464:
459:
455:
451:
448:
447:
446:
445:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
415:
412:
408:
405:
403:
399:
395:
391:
388:
386:
382:
378:
374:
371:
368:
365:
362:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
331:
328:
324:
323:
322:
321:
318:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
287:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
262:
261:
260:
259:
256:
253:
249:
245:
242:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
201:
200:
199:
198:
194:
190:
180:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
137:
134:
130:
127:
126:Find sources:
122:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
538:
535:
512:
500:
449:
420:
410:
406:
389:
363:
341:
288:
271:
263:
243:
202:
189:MikeWazowski
186:
174:
168:
160:
153:
147:
141:
135:
125:
52:Juliancolton
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
482:Marasmusine
433:Marasmusine
209:), Kotaku (
151:free images
521:SkyWalker
377:Joe Chill
505:MuZemike
429:Fan film
411:redirect
293:WP:NFILM
223:very few
118:View log
450:Comment
350:MrKIA11
264:Comment
157:WP refs
145:scholar
91:protect
86:history
407:Delete
372:, and
301:WP:WEB
297:Troops
266:- Per
244:Delete
129:Google
95:delete
425:WP:NF
327:Panyd
307:). -
252:Panyd
172:JSTOR
133:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
525:talk
519:. --
513:Keep
501:Keep
486:talk
471:talk
463:WP:N
458:WP:N
454:WP:N
437:talk
423:off
398:talk
394:TJRC
390:Keep
381:talk
364:Keep
354:talk
342:Note
313:talk
305:WP:N
280:talk
268:WP:N
235:talk
229:. -
227:WP:N
219:here
215:here
211:here
207:here
203:Keep
193:talk
165:FENS
139:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
46:keep
517:one
421:way
409:or
179:TWL
116:– (
527:)
488:)
473:)
439:)
400:)
383:)
375:.
369:,
356:)
348:.
315:)
282:)
270:-
250:.
237:)
195:)
159:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
56:|
523:(
484:(
469:(
435:(
396:(
379:(
352:(
311:(
278:(
233:(
191:(
183:)
175:·
169:·
161:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
136:·
131:(
123:(
120:)
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.