198:
into pornographic this and that. They just want to know for their own perverted minds not because they care. Furthermore if she has in fact been in any pornographic films, etc. That was then, non of our business and just leave her alone. She is doing the Lords bidding now. Plus, FACT: She will tell you she was the last person to ever think that she could be saved. It goes to show that God really does work in mysterious ways. Those of you who bash her, he just hasn't got to you yet. God Bless!-a christian
75:. I suspect that it's just simply time to chuck the whole thing in the trash; if the anons who keep adding maliciously gleeful (and utterly unsourced) details about Ms. Scott's alleged shady past can't dig up an actual reliable source for any of their accusations, there's no reason for there to be an article. --
197:
Anyone who would bash Pastor Scott doesn't have a clue what a christian is. Just because someone might have a "shady" past doesn't mean jack squat now. This is present time, when you become a christian you are forgiven for all sins. Right? right. Therefore all of the people wanting to know if she was
113:
We should not be keeping biography articles that make potentially defamatory, unsourced claims about the subject just in case a source pops up. I have removed the dodgy parts of the article, and they should not reappear until we can prove them by reference to reliable sources.
186:
like happened before. I've lost count on how many times I've had to revert this article, but I had thought that the anons would've gotten a clue by now. Speaking of which, instead of nominating it for deletion, what about nominating it for protection from anonymous users?
70:
An unsourced article which makes extremely strong claims regarding the alleged pornographic past of the subject. It has been waiting over seven months for cleanup and still doesn't come even close to meeting
143:
on the pornography allegations from the history, other than amused observations about graceless priggishness and deception, but that's not an AfD issue in any case.
17:
182:
Just chucking it into the
Internet landfill won't do much, as the anons will just re-create the article anyhow, or go and vandalise
100:
It does seem there has been sexual controveries in the past. Thoough religious terms and
Melissa Scott do have a weak google count.
51:
213:
191:
166:
147:
123:
104:
92:
79:
58:
64:
228:
36:
155:- find a picture of Barbie Bridges - find one of Melissa Pastore - reasonable to determine if it is the same person?
227:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
119:
163:
89:
76:
115:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
188:
206:
159:
72:
48:
210:
176:
Entire peice is rhetoric and presents as much truth as a bottom shelf Wal Mart tabloid.
183:
136:
144:
101:
205:
but certainly remove any unsourced defamatory remarks in accordance with
221:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
139:
televangelist ministry, she is notable enough to pass.
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
231:). No further edits should be made to this page.
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
1:
135:. If she is carrying on the
65:Melissa Scott (televangelist)
214:19:03, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
59:19:30, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
248:
192:22:13, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
167:20:27, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
148:19:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
124:10:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
105:07:22, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
93:03:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
80:03:40, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
224:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
160:original research
239:
226:
164:Antaeus Feldspar
90:Antaeus Feldspar
88:per own nom. --
77:Antaeus Feldspar
56:
34:
247:
246:
242:
241:
240:
238:
237:
236:
235:
229:deletion review
222:
145:Smerdis of Tlön
98:Keep and source
68:
52:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
245:
243:
234:
233:
217:
216:
195:
194:
177:
171:
170:
169:
158:That would be
150:
129:
128:
127:
126:
108:
107:
95:
67:
62:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
244:
232:
230:
225:
219:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
201:
200:
199:
193:
190:
185:
181:
178:
175:
172:
168:
165:
161:
157:
156:
154:
151:
149:
146:
142:
138:
134:
131:
130:
125:
121:
117:
112:
111:
110:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
87:
84:
83:
82:
81:
78:
74:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
50:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
223:
220:
202:
196:
184:this article
179:
173:
152:
140:
137:Eugene Scott
132:
120:befuddle me!
97:
85:
69:
53:
45:
43:
31:
28:
189:Cooleyez229
141:No opinion
116:fuddlemark
211:RFerreira
207:WP:BLP
174:Delete
86:Delete
73:WP:BLP
162:. --
54:juice
49:Mango
46:keep.
16:<
203:Keep
180:Keep
153:Test
133:Keep
102:C56C
209:.
187:--
122:)
118:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.