420:. Unencyclopedic article based on rumor and hearsay — in major venues such as The Register, but still. Blogs and news websites citing each other and what they overheard/interpret about a product that may at some point have been in development simply cannot pass for reliable reporting, nor in-depth coverage of a topic.
450:
is exceptionally clear: "Knowledge (XXG) is not a collection of product announcements and rumors. Although
Knowledge (XXG) includes up-to-date knowledge about newly revealed products, short articles that consist only of product announcement information are not appropriate. Until such time that more
262:
I don't have the ability to look at the previous version of this article but based on what I see in this one, and the comments from the last AfD discussion, it would seem the same issues exist. And for the record I concur with the consensus from that discussion. This would seem to be a potential CSD
280:
Please read CSD G4 again. Anyone can tell that this is not a repost: it's been edited numerous times since it was created, including multiple non-minor edits. Even if it were originally a repost (which it isn't; it's a completely new article), it's been edited enough times that it definitely
342:
Actually G-4 applies even if there has been editing, if the same problems identified in the original AfD are still present. G-4 is only disallowed if the new editing/version has corrected those issues. As far as I can see that is not the case here. See
85:
80:
187:
451:
encyclopedic knowledge about the product can be verified, product announcements should be merged to a larger topic (such as an article about the creator(s), a series of products, or a previous product) if applicable.
75:
181:
306:. G4 would apply since the reason for the deletion in the previous AfD (lack of notability) still applies. And additionally the previous AfD settled that A7 would definitely apply.
365:
Kindly read the actual criterion, which "excludes pages that are not substantially identical to the deleted version". This criterion is for reposts, and the essay has it wrong.
147:
324:
No, the whole point of G4 is, and always has been, to get rid of content that's already been deleted at AFD. Anyone can tell that this content was never before at AFD.
239:
140:
113:
108:
117:
100:
464:
434:
400:
374:
356:
333:
315:
290:
272:
251:
231:
58:
202:
169:
17:
163:
159:
483:
40:
311:
227:
209:
104:
96:
64:
384:
387:
would suggest that the article is not substantially different. Your defense appears to be relying heavily on
307:
223:
175:
303:
479:
396:
352:
268:
36:
56:
447:
195:
388:
429:
370:
329:
286:
247:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
478:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
344:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
453:
Speculation and rumor, even from reliable sources, are not appropriate encyclopedic content.
392:
348:
264:
220:
Speculation and rumor, even from reliable sources, are not appropriate encyclopedic content.
443:
460:
53:
442:. There is significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources, required by
421:
366:
325:
282:
243:
134:
456:
383:
If the same problem that lead to the first deletion still exists, then
86:
Articles for deletion/Meltemi (operating system) (3rd nomination)
81:
Articles for deletion/Meltemi (operating system) (2nd nomination)
472:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
130:
126:
122:
218:
In the previous deletion discussion the consensus was
194:
208:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
486:). No further edits should be made to this page.
76:Articles for deletion/Meltemi (operating system)
240:list of Software-related deletion discussions
8:
238:Note: This debate has been included in the
237:
302:Please stop the disallowed practice of
73:
446:; however, Knowledge (XXG) policy in
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
71:
24:
281:wouldn't be a repost anymore.
1:
503:
97:Meltemi (operating system)
65:Meltemi (operating system)
475:Please do not modify it.
465:00:42, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
435:16:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
401:12:25, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
375:05:51, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
357:10:35, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
334:09:15, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
316:07:40, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
291:02:32, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
273:17:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
252:19:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
232:18:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
59:03:11, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
70:AfDs for this article:
222:This still applies.
48:The result was
433:
425:
308:CorrectKissinTime
254:
224:CorrectKissinTime
494:
477:
427:
423:
263:G-4 candidate. -
213:
212:
198:
150:
138:
120:
34:
502:
501:
497:
496:
495:
493:
492:
491:
490:
484:deletion review
473:
155:
146:
111:
95:
92:
90:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
500:
498:
489:
488:
468:
467:
437:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
378:
377:
360:
359:
337:
336:
319:
318:
294:
293:
275:
256:
255:
216:
215:
152:
91:
89:
88:
83:
78:
72:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
499:
487:
485:
481:
476:
470:
469:
466:
462:
458:
454:
449:
445:
441:
438:
436:
431:
426:
419:
416:
415:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
382:
381:
380:
379:
376:
372:
368:
364:
363:
362:
361:
358:
354:
350:
346:
341:
340:
339:
338:
335:
331:
327:
323:
322:
321:
320:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
298:
297:
296:
295:
292:
288:
284:
279:
276:
274:
270:
266:
261:
258:
257:
253:
249:
245:
241:
236:
235:
234:
233:
229:
225:
221:
211:
207:
204:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
161:
158:
157:Find sources:
153:
149:
145:
142:
136:
132:
128:
124:
119:
115:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
93:
87:
84:
82:
79:
77:
74:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
474:
471:
452:
439:
417:
385:common sense
304:WP:LAWYERING
299:
277:
259:
219:
217:
205:
199:
191:
184:
178:
172:
166:
156:
143:
49:
47:
31:
28:
393:Ad Orientem
349:Ad Orientem
265:Ad Orientem
182:free images
448:WP:CRYSTAL
54:j⚛e decker
480:talk page
244:• Gene93k
37:talk page
482:or in a
424:VVERTYVS
389:legalism
141:View log
39:or in a
367:Nyttend
345:WP:CSDX
326:Nyttend
300:Comment
283:Nyttend
278:Comment
188:WP refs
176:scholar
114:protect
109:history
444:WP:GNG
440:Delete
418:Delete
260:Delete
160:Google
118:delete
50:delete
457:Agyle
203:JSTOR
164:books
148:Stats
135:views
127:watch
123:links
16:<
461:talk
397:talk
371:talk
353:talk
330:talk
312:talk
287:talk
269:talk
248:talk
228:talk
196:FENS
170:news
131:logs
105:talk
101:edit
430:hm?
391:. -
347:. -
210:TWL
139:– (
463:)
455:"
399:)
373:)
355:)
332:)
314:)
289:)
271:)
250:)
242:.
230:)
190:)
133:|
129:|
125:|
121:|
116:|
112:|
107:|
103:|
52:.
459:(
432:)
428:(
422:Q
395:(
369:(
351:(
328:(
310:(
285:(
267:(
246:(
226:(
214:)
206:·
200:·
192:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
162:(
154:(
151:)
144:·
137:)
99:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.