405:"The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper articles, magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations"
349:, for example. To finish, it's important to mention I'm not even making money out of the website, it's non commercial and its content is released under a libre license. This will be my sole comment, because I don't really want a COI outcry, it's the least thing I would like to experience here on Knowledge (XXG) now.
553:
Certainly, there appears to be a clear COI - as I have made clear at the thread on the noticeboard. It isn't however necessary to retain off-topic material in the article to demonstrate this, as it is all visible in the history. As for whether the article (minus the off-topic material) deserves
535:). Besides that I insists in that coverage is not large enought, no large nationwide newspaper has covered mentioned Memoria Pichilemina, and the local newspapers have done so only once. Memoria Pichilemina has also not recived any significant recognition or prize.
384:) does makes Diego Grez's website notable. For that to happen it should have perhaps one of these..: 1) recieved some national/international recognition/prize, 2) be mentioned more than 1 time by a large national newspaper, 3) considerable traffic.
333:: The nominator has already made clear I am related to the article's subject, I founded the website, and so I am not voting in this discussion, to avoid COI accusations. However, I think that the website satisfies the
163:
512:
I have removed material relating to the founder from the article - if the website is notable, it is for the content, not the founder, and I can see no justification whatsoever for such off-topic detail.
398:
It does not say anywhere in the notability guidelines that a website has got to be mentioned more than 1 time by a large national newspaper for it to be qualified for a
Knowledge (XXG) article.
531:
The material you deleted contained information that showed that the founder/owner/administrator Kuñall works at one of the newspapers used to "establish coverage" (a clear case of
157:
453:
116:
433:
123:
337:. Why? It conforms to the policy on verifiability to reliable sources, yes, it does. There are two major sources in the article, the recent articles of
89:
84:
93:
76:
652:
345:. Both news articles are one-page-long, they are not simple "mentions". We do have other articles on local Chilean websites too, like
17:
554:
deletion, I've so far voiced no opinion either way, and should probably avoid doing so, given my previous interactions with Kuñall.
178:
145:
313:
399:
334:
316:
is precisely what we suggest editors with a CoI do. Although Diego Grez may have suggested it, he never edited the page.
679:
40:
139:
660:
633:
611:
590:
563:
544:
522:
496:
465:
445:
419:
393:
358:
325:
300:
274:
244:
215:
58:
135:
80:
656:
185:
607:
559:
540:
518:
492:
389:
378:
296:
211:
410:
It complies with that criteria. There are two in-depth articles on the website, it passes the guideline.
675:
36:
629:
415:
354:
195:
56:
372:
171:
72:
64:
625:
599:
411:
350:
151:
616:
Since you nominated this article for deletion, it's unnecessary that you vote. I do write for
603:
586:
555:
536:
514:
488:
461:
441:
385:
292:
256:
207:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
674:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
402:
states notability for web-based content is "based on meeting one of the following criteria":
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
270:
202:) except one-time mention in a few local newspapers. (this might also possibly be a case of
648:
644:
578:
532:
484:
203:
598:
Coverage not enough coverage. Only local newspapapers (connected to the owner adn creator
53:
312:- the CoI seems to be irrelevant here. Suggesting an article to be created by others via
346:
321:
284:
262:
577:
Sources are local press only and therefore insufficient to demonstrate notability per
480:
199:
240:
229:
582:
457:
437:
225:
This nomination was incorrectly formatted. I have reformatted the nomination using
110:
266:
194:
Article about small-town history web-page created 1 year ago by
Knowledge (XXG)
370:
I suppose now in good faith that Diego Grez has no connection with people from
317:
236:
479:
complies with the criteria because its lacks significant coverage (
483:) and you should refrein from making further comments because of
287:
created the page, but did so apparently on Diego Grez's (Kuñall)
668:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
368:. Verifiability and one-time mention by tiny-local newspaper (
198:(aka. Kuñall and MisterWiki). No evidence of notability (
423:(By the way, this will be my actual last comment here.)
288:
106:
102:
98:
170:
624:, which is published by a company from San Fernando.
602:). Website locks significant recognition or prize.
184:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
682:). No further edits should be made to this page.
454:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
382:, albiet that is difficult in such small town
8:
452:Note: This debate has been included in the
432:Note: This debate has been included in the
451:
434:list of Chile-related deletion discussions
431:
206:, but lets discuss relevance here first).
400:Knowledge (XXG):Notability_(web)#Criteria
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
643:Local press coverage only ,fails
335:web content notability guideline
1:
475:Kuñall/Diego Grez, it does
699:
620:but I have no relation to
671:Please do not modify it.
661:06:02, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
634:15:31, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
612:14:41, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
591:14:43, 29 May 2014 (UTC)
564:23:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
545:23:45, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
523:22:33, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
497:13:24, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
466:00:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
446:00:54, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
420:22:57, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
394:22:51, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
359:21:21, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
326:21:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
301:20:59, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
275:20:55, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
245:20:49, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
216:20:17, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
59:03:13, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
265:created this page, no?
379:El Expreso de la Costa
339:El Expreso de la Costa
261:- I'm a tad confused.
314:WP:Requested articles
622:La Voz de la Región
343:La Voz de la Región
73:Memoria Pichilemina
65:Memoria Pichilemina
48:The result was
468:
448:
383:
247:
690:
673:
424:
369:
260:
234:
228:
221:
189:
188:
174:
126:
114:
96:
34:
698:
697:
693:
692:
691:
689:
688:
687:
686:
680:deletion review
669:
422:
254:
232:
226:
196:user:Diego Grez
131:
122:
87:
71:
68:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
696:
694:
685:
684:
664:
663:
638:
637:
636:
593:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
548:
547:
526:
525:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
449:
428:
427:
426:
425:
408:
407:
406:
373:Pichilemu News
362:
361:
328:
306:
305:
304:
303:
285:User:Acalycine
278:
277:
263:User:Acalycine
248:
192:
191:
128:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
695:
683:
681:
677:
672:
666:
665:
662:
658:
654:
653:94.195.46.205
650:
646:
642:
639:
635:
631:
627:
623:
619:
618:El Expreso...
615:
614:
613:
609:
605:
601:
597:
594:
592:
588:
584:
580:
576:
573:
572:
565:
561:
557:
552:
551:
550:
549:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
529:
528:
527:
524:
520:
516:
511:
508:
507:
498:
494:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
467:
463:
459:
455:
450:
447:
443:
439:
435:
430:
429:
421:
417:
413:
409:
404:
403:
401:
397:
396:
395:
391:
387:
381:
380:
375:
374:
367:
364:
363:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
332:
329:
327:
323:
319:
315:
311:
308:
307:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
282:
281:
280:
279:
276:
272:
268:
264:
258:
252:
249:
246:
242:
238:
231:
224:
220:
219:
218:
217:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
187:
183:
180:
177:
173:
169:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
141:
137:
134:
133:Find sources:
129:
125:
121:
118:
112:
108:
104:
100:
95:
91:
86:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
670:
667:
640:
621:
617:
604:Sietecolores
595:
574:
556:AndyTheGrump
537:Sietecolores
515:AndyTheGrump
509:
489:Sietecolores
476:
386:Sietecolores
377:
371:
365:
342:
338:
330:
309:
293:Sietecolores
257:Sietecolores
250:
222:
208:Sietecolores
193:
181:
175:
167:
160:
154:
148:
142:
132:
119:
49:
47:
31:
28:
347:WikiLosRíos
158:free images
289:suggestion
54:j⚛e decker
676:talk page
458:• Gene93k
438:• Gene93k
37:talk page
678:or in a
117:View log
39:or in a
583:ukexpat
366:Comment
331:Comment
310:Comment
251:Comment
164:WP refs
152:scholar
90:protect
85:history
649:WP:WEB
647:&
645:wp:GNG
641:Delete
626:Küñall
600:Kunall
596:Delete
579:WP:GNG
575:Delete
533:WP:COI
485:WP:COI
412:Küñall
351:Küñall
267:NickCT
204:WP:COI
136:Google
94:delete
50:delete
510:Note.
223:Note:
179:JSTOR
140:books
124:Stats
111:views
103:watch
99:links
16:<
657:talk
630:talk
608:talk
587:talk
560:talk
541:talk
519:talk
493:talk
481:WP:N
462:talk
442:talk
416:talk
390:talk
355:talk
341:and
322:talk
318:Huon
297:talk
283:Yes
271:talk
241:talk
230:Afd2
212:talk
200:WP:N
172:FENS
146:news
107:logs
81:talk
77:edit
477:not
376:or
237:Mz7
186:TWL
115:– (
659:)
651:.
632:)
610:)
589:)
581:.
562:)
543:)
521:)
495:)
487:.
464:)
456:.
444:)
436:.
418:)
392:)
357:)
324:)
299:)
291:.
273:)
253:-
243:)
235:.
233:}}
227:{{
214:)
166:)
109:|
105:|
101:|
97:|
92:|
88:|
83:|
79:|
52:.
655:(
628:(
606:(
585:(
558:(
539:(
517:(
491:(
460:(
440:(
414:(
388:(
353:(
320:(
295:(
269:(
259::
255:@
239:(
210:(
190:)
182:·
176:·
168:·
161:·
155:·
149:·
143:·
138:(
130:(
127:)
120:·
113:)
75:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.