257:"The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself. This criterion includes reliable published works in all forms, such as newspaper and magazine articles, books, television documentaries, websites, and published reports by consumer watchdog organizations"
265:
suggests that websites should be the subject of multiple, independent, non-trivial published works. Upon closer examination, many of the sources I located with Google only mentioned MND tangentially, although it's worth noting that they treated it as a fairly prominent site. Here are some sources
166:
73:
229:
Hmm. I'm not really seeing the self-promotional tone or the lack of NPOV so much. And Google turns up plenty of coverage – in fact, this website is included as a source on Google News search. Meets
127:
331:"The content is distributed via a medium which is both respected and independent of the creators, either through an online newspaper or magazine, an online publisher, or an online broadcaster"
68:
335:
Not sure if this applies. For what it's worth, I was able to find articles from MND on other sites, although I'm not sure if any one of those qualifies under this criterion.
211:
My problems with the article are: lack of notability of the subject, lack of non-trivial secondary sources, lack of neutral point of view, and self-promotion by the author.
160:
288:
describes MND as a "credible, daily news, commentary, sex roles, satire, irreverence, metropolitan trends," although I'm not sure if that counts as a reliable source.
261:
First of all, I found a wealth of trivial mentions of MND (far too many to list), indicating that it's a well-established, fairly prominent website. That said,
370:
but rewrite. The current article is a combination of POV and OR, but could be used asa basis for a proper article,I think the references are just adequate.
100:
95:
104:
300:
87:
17:
181:
148:
238:
220:
206:
396:
36:
142:
234:
381:
359:
308:
242:
52:
395:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
138:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
321:"The website or content has won a well-known and independent award from either a publication or organization"
304:
216:
202:
296:
291:
91:
188:
83:
58:
174:
343:
276:
212:
198:
154:
281:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
262:
230:
377:
352:
49:
286:
121:
271:
372:
266:
that are independent of the subject that count as significant coverage:
197:
Notability, secondary sources, neutral point of view, self-promotion
346:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
273:
is an article about MND that appeared in several major newspapers.
389:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
117:
113:
109:
74:
Articles for deletion/Men's News Daily (2nd nomination)
173:
293:is a science journal that cites material from MND.
351:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
187:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
399:). No further edits should be made to this page.
251:Further explanation, at the nominator's request:
8:
66:
69:Articles for deletion/Men's News Daily
283:is a published online work about MND.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
65:
24:
278:is a magazine article about MND.
1:
382:04:48, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
360:22:59, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
309:18:36, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
243:17:02, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
221:21:27, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
207:05:24, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
53:06:34, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
416:
57:
392:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
64:AfDs for this article:
235:A Stop at Willoughby
44:The result was
362:
299:comment added by
407:
394:
357:
350:
348:
311:
192:
191:
177:
125:
107:
84:Men's News Daily
59:Men's News Daily
34:
415:
414:
410:
409:
408:
406:
405:
404:
403:
397:deletion review
390:
353:
341:
294:
134:
98:
82:
79:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
413:
411:
402:
401:
385:
384:
364:
363:
349:
338:
337:
336:
333:
327:
326:
323:
317:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
289:
284:
279:
274:
259:
254:
253:
252:
246:
245:
195:
194:
131:
78:
77:
76:
71:
63:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
412:
400:
398:
393:
387:
386:
383:
379:
375:
374:
369:
366:
365:
361:
358:
356:
347:
345:
340:
339:
334:
332:
329:
328:
324:
322:
319:
318:
310:
306:
302:
301:70.108.244.33
298:
292:
290:
287:
285:
282:
280:
277:
275:
272:
270:
269:
268:
267:
264:
260:
258:
255:
250:
249:
248:
247:
244:
240:
236:
232:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
218:
214:
213:VegetativePup
209:
208:
204:
200:
199:VegetativePup
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
129:
123:
119:
115:
111:
106:
102:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
80:
75:
72:
70:
67:
60:
55:
54:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
391:
388:
371:
367:
354:
342:
330:
320:
256:
226:
210:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
45:
43:
31:
28:
295:—Preceding
161:free images
344:Relisted
297:unsigned
128:View log
355:JForget
167:WP refs
155:scholar
101:protect
96:history
50:Spartaz
263:WP:WEB
231:WP:WEB
139:Google
105:delete
378:talk
182:JSTOR
143:books
122:views
114:watch
110:links
16:<
368:Keep
305:talk
239:talk
227:Keep
217:talk
203:talk
175:FENS
149:news
118:logs
92:talk
88:edit
46:keep
373:DGG
325:N/A
189:TWL
126:– (
380:)
307:)
241:)
233:.
219:)
205:)
169:)
120:|
116:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
48:.
376:(
303:(
237:(
215:(
201:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
124:)
86:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.