412:: I nominated it for speedy deletion; another editor removed the deletion template, which that editor had a right to do; I nominated it for deletion using this process, which I had a right to do. Anyone is free to express their belief that the article should be kept and to present evidence in support the notability of the topic, and I encourage editors to do so. None of this is vandalism; it's how things are supposed to work.
339:
345:
On edit, I see what you are trying to say- that it doesn't apply to objects, only people, events, companies etc, which is true. But the point was expressed poorly enough to raise an eyebrow. I suggest greater precision in edit summaries, so the reasoning is in plain sight. Apologies for the
336:
483:
Meh, I think not- it makes a sort-of credible claim of significance (if pumpkin chucking applies, of course!) and I think A11 is more for things imagined as important by the creator. Others' mileage may vary though- it's an interesting question. —
439:, and probably should have tried PROD first, which doesn't seem to have happened. Single thing built by a single individual, for a single competition, which got the "local firefighter rescues kitten from tree" coverage.
177:
343:
As for the 'A7 does not apply to this type of subject'; I assumed this to be some kind of joke. Is there some kind of inherent notability in lobbing pumpkins around with medieval siege engines?
386:
171:
130:
282:
was 100% in the wrong, dude nominated it for deletion, and than 20 minutes later decided to nominate it for speedy deletion. This is just vandalism.
137:
103:
98:
66:
107:
492:
358:
17:
218:
does human interest stories about some random person doing something unusual, and most of these persons and doings are not notable.
90:
350:
is within the bounds of possibility I suppose: but it would need a helluva lot of coverage in reliable sources into the future. —
192:
159:
485:
351:
565:
40:
394:
153:
513:
61:
546:
517:
494:
472:
451:
431:
398:
377:
368:. This article does not have a substantial amount of information, lacks credible sources, and is not notable.
360:
305:
291:
266:
249:
227:
72:
149:
468:
328:
94:
440:
427:
390:
223:
561:
199:
36:
464:
86:
78:
534:
509:
373:
210:
185:
56:
53:
324:
287:
262:
332:
542:
423:
279:
219:
165:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
560:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
526:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
301:
245:
530:
460:
320:
415:
369:
409:
283:
258:
538:
124:
297:
241:
347:
278:
Agreed; speedy deletions don't apply to things as a type of catapult.
214:
and an article in an anyone-can-edit Wiki do not suggest notability.
422:
source, but I agree with you, of course, that it is not notable. —
554:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
296:
Any excuse in a storm to keep letting WP get filled with dreck.
237:
120:
116:
112:
184:
346:
confusion. Incidentally, a merge with / redirect to
198:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
568:). No further edits should be made to this page.
463:(adopted while I was away). Would it apply here?
387:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
418:: I think the article does have at least one
8:
385:Note: This debate has been included in the
255:Reverting the speedy tag was bad judgement
384:
257:Uh, A7 doesn't apply to trebuchets...
254:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
240:the speedy tag was bad judgement.
24:
535:news source is not good enough
236:promotional and not-notable.
1:
585:
557:Please do not modify it.
547:14:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
518:12:26, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
495:17:57, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
473:17:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
452:13:11, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
432:05:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
399:17:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
378:12:54, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
361:08:01, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
306:02:13, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
292:04:35, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
267:02:09, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
250:02:07, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
228:22:21, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
73:04:18, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
323:. More specifically, a
327:indicates a dearth of
459:Lack experience with
508:- only one article.
216:The Washington Post
211:The Washington Post
401:
391:Shawn in Montreal
576:
559:
490:
449:
446:
443:
356:
203:
202:
188:
140:
128:
110:
87:Merlin Trebuchet
79:Merlin Trebuchet
69:
64:
59:
34:
584:
583:
579:
578:
577:
575:
574:
573:
572:
566:deletion review
555:
533:by a mile. One
486:
447:
444:
441:
352:
208:One article in
145:
136:
101:
85:
82:
67:
62:
57:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
582:
580:
571:
570:
550:
549:
520:
510:Deathlibrarian
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
497:
476:
475:
454:
434:
413:
403:
402:
381:
380:
363:
313:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
273:
272:
271:
270:
206:
205:
142:
81:
76:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
581:
569:
567:
563:
558:
552:
551:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
521:
519:
515:
511:
507:
504:
503:
496:
493:
491:
489:
482:
481:
480:
479:
478:
477:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
455:
453:
450:
438:
435:
433:
429:
425:
421:
417:
414:
411:
408:
407:
406:
400:
396:
392:
388:
383:
382:
379:
375:
371:
367:
364:
362:
359:
357:
355:
349:
344:
340:
337:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
314:
307:
303:
299:
295:
294:
293:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:
275:
274:
268:
264:
260:
256:
253:
252:
251:
247:
243:
239:
235:
232:
231:
230:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
212:
201:
197:
194:
191:
187:
183:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
151:
148:
147:Find sources:
143:
139:
135:
132:
126:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
83:
80:
77:
75:
74:
70:
65:
60:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
556:
553:
522:
505:
487:
465:Dlohcierekim
456:
436:
424:Anomalocaris
419:
404:
365:
353:
342:
316:
280:Anomalocaris
233:
220:Anomalocaris
215:
209:
207:
195:
189:
181:
174:
168:
162:
156:
146:
133:
49:
47:
31:
28:
405:Comments:
172:free images
461:WP:CSD#a11
335:coverage:
329:persistent
325:WP: BEFORE
562:talk page
488:O Fortuna
416:Bmbaker88
370:Bmbaker88
354:O Fortuna
348:trebuchet
238:Reverting
37:talk page
564:or in a
529:- fails
420:credible
410:ElThomas
333:in-depth
284:ElThomas
259:Adam9007
131:View log
39:or in a
539:Bearian
527:WP:SNOW
442:Timothy
178:WP refs
166:scholar
104:protect
99:history
54:King of
531:WP:GNG
523:Delete
506:Delete
445:Joseph
437:Delete
366:Delete
317:Delete
298:Jytdog
242:Jytdog
234:delete
150:Google
108:delete
50:delete
457:Query
321:WP:CB
193:JSTOR
154:books
138:Stats
125:views
117:watch
113:links
16:<
543:talk
525:per
514:talk
469:talk
448:Wood
428:talk
395:talk
374:talk
319:per
302:talk
288:talk
263:talk
246:talk
224:talk
186:FENS
160:news
121:logs
95:talk
91:edit
200:TWL
129:– (
52:.
545:)
537:.
516:)
471:)
430:)
397:)
389:.
376:)
341:.
338:,
331:,
304:)
290:)
265:)
248:)
226:)
180:)
123:|
119:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
97:|
93:|
71:♠
541:(
512:(
467:(
426:(
393:(
372:(
300:(
286:(
269:~
261:(
244:(
222:(
204:)
196:·
190:·
182:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
157:·
152:(
144:(
141:)
134:·
127:)
89:(
68:♣
63:♦
58:♥
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.