270:. However, I do acknowedge that the sources I mentioned could be more comprehensive as far as coverage is concerned, but I think she establishes at least a bare minimum amount of notability.
210:
120:
127:
Not notable. Article asserts only a connection with a barely notable group, but this is not enough. Google hits seem to be largely to social networking sites.
233:
255:
87:
82:
91:
17:
74:
268:
265:
310:
36:
150:
132:
166:
is a "barely notable group", why do they have an article? And if they are not, isn't being one of their VPs notable?
309:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
295:
274:
245:
222:
198:
184:
175:
154:
136:
56:
146:
128:
78:
218:
194:
171:
70:
62:
287:
271:
181:
241:
189:
Also, the existence or nonexistence of another article has no bearing on the this article. --
163:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
283:
291:
258:
214:
190:
167:
145:
also the creator has been blocked indefinitely for "promotion of a company or group".
237:
50:
108:
180:
I would think the Chair
Emeritus thing has something to do with that.
267:. She is also briefly mentioned in other major outlets such as CNET
303:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
254:— some mention of her appointment as Chair Emeritus of the IGDA
264:
as the video game industry's top 100 most influential women
115:
104:
100:
96:
211:list of Living people-related deletion discussions
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
313:). No further edits should be made to this page.
234:list of video game related deletion discussions
8:
232:: This debate has been included in the
209:: This debate has been included in the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
282:Fails inclusion criteria as per
1:
330:
296:04:28, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
57:04:22, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
275:17:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
246:15:47, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
223:00:00, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
199:22:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
185:17:11, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
176:17:16, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
155:03:15, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
137:03:11, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
306:Please do not modify it.
286:. No reliable sources.--
257:. She is also listed by
32:Please do not modify it.
44:The result was
248:
225:
147:Thompson Is Right
129:Thompson Is Right
321:
308:
228:
205:
118:
112:
94:
53:
34:
329:
328:
324:
323:
322:
320:
319:
318:
317:
311:deletion review
304:
114:
85:
71:Mitzi McGilvray
69:
66:
63:Mitzi McGilvray
51:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
327:
325:
316:
315:
299:
298:
277:
249:
226:
203:
202:
201:
187:
157:
125:
124:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
326:
314:
312:
307:
301:
300:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
278:
276:
273:
269:
266:
263:
261:
256:
253:
250:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
188:
186:
183:
179:
178:
177:
173:
169:
165:
161:
158:
156:
152:
148:
144:
141:
140:
139:
138:
134:
130:
122:
117:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
54:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
305:
302:
279:
259:
251:
229:
206:
159:
142:
126:
49:
46:no consensus
45:
43:
31:
28:
215:Erwin85Bot
191:Jelly Soup
168:Proxy User
252:Weak keep
272:MuZemike
262:magazine
182:MuZemike
164:TikGames
121:View log
284:WP:NOTE
238:MrKIA11
143:Comment
88:protect
83:history
52:MBisanz
288:Sloane
280:Delete
116:delete
92:delete
162:- If
119:) – (
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
292:talk
260:Edge
242:talk
230:Note
219:talk
213:. --
207:Note
195:talk
172:talk
160:Keep
151:talk
133:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
294:)
244:)
236:.
221:)
197:)
174:)
153:)
135:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
48:.
290:(
240:(
217:(
193:(
170:(
149:(
131:(
123:)
113:(
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.