290:- I am the author of this article and I believe this article need not be deleted from Knowledge. Firstly, the tone of the article is neutral and all the information is verifiable as all the necessary references have been listed now. Yes it is true that there is no substantial third party reference to the subject of the article and that is so because the application is still not officially released and is currently under development process. Moreover, if one can visit CodePlex and do some research, you will notice that MixERP is the most active project among all the "ERP" projects being hosted over at codeplex.
362:
article, but they are popular nonetheless. On the other hand, stuff like my main area of expertise, articles on roads, may not be the most popular thing that everyone around the world and on the internet is talking about, but they still have multiple reliable sources covering them, and thus are notable enough for inclusion in
Knowledge.
361:
I believe you've misinterpreted that line from the GNG. What that's supposed to mean is that just because something is popular, doesn't mean it's notable, and vice versa. For example, a lot of memes aren't covered by reliable sources and are therefore not notable enough to have their own
Knowledge
335:
As I stated earlier, there is definitely serious lack of third party coverage of the product but it isn't completely non-existent either. For instance, the official twitter account of "Planet
PostgreSQL", which apparently has over 4500 followers,recently tweeted one of the article explaining how
347:. So, just because the product has not been popularly mentioned all over the internet, doesn't imply that it isn't important enough to be included in Knowledge. I expect careful consideration of all aspects before making any hasty decisions.
166:
119:
218:
160:
339:. Now, for an application which is not even officially released yet, that is definitely a notable feat and shows the importance of the project. Moreover,
201:
software. References given are either primary or a blog. Google searches provide nothing substantial on this application. Disputed prod.
126:
17:
405:
368:
227:
181:
148:
92:
87:
502:
479:
96:
40:
79:
498:
142:
36:
291:
475:
198:
348:
294:
174:
138:
352:
298:
271:
83:
483:
462:
418:
381:
356:
326:
302:
280:
240:
210:
61:
337:
188:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
497:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
428:
400:
363:
222:
75:
67:
345:"Determining notability does not necessarily depend on things such as fame or popularity "
459:
310:
256:
340:
322:
314:
262:
252:
206:
57:
154:
396:
113:
293:
Nothing is misleading and the article was created only for informative purposes.
410:
373:
232:
440:
431:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
395:- In addition to my above comment, this software doesn't seem to have any
318:
202:
53:
399:
covering it. I don't think it passes any of the notability guidelines.
491:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
109:
105:
101:
173:
438:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
317:? The lack of independent coverage is the issue.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
505:). No further edits should be made to this page.
474:Reliable sources for this article are scarce.
251:- I'm unable to find evidence that this meets
336:MixERP has been powered by PostgreSQL server
219:list of Software-related deletion discussions
187:
8:
217:Note: This debate has been included in the
216:
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
484:23:43, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
463:03:39, 23 August 2013 (UTC)
419:09:50, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
382:20:04, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
357:18:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)
327:07:52, 18 August 2013 (UTC)
303:08:59, 17 August 2013 (UTC)
281:18:58, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
241:12:09, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
211:11:48, 16 August 2013 (UTC)
62:21:27, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
522:
494:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
343:also clearly states,
465:
309:How does it meet
279:
243:
513:
496:
461:
456:
453:
450:
447:
444:
437:
433:
416:
413:
408:
403:
397:reliable sources
379:
376:
371:
366:
278:
275:
269:
266:
260:
238:
235:
230:
225:
192:
191:
177:
129:
117:
99:
48:The result was
34:
521:
520:
516:
515:
514:
512:
511:
510:
509:
503:deletion review
492:
476:DavidLeighEllis
454:
451:
448:
445:
442:
439:
426:
414:
411:
406:
401:
377:
374:
369:
364:
273:
270:
264:
261:
236:
233:
228:
223:
134:
125:
90:
74:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
519:
517:
508:
507:
487:
486:
468:
467:
466:
435:
434:
423:
422:
421:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
330:
329:
306:
305:
284:
283:
245:
244:
195:
194:
131:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
518:
506:
504:
500:
495:
489:
488:
485:
481:
477:
473:
470:
469:
464:
460:
458:
457:
436:
432:
430:
425:
424:
420:
417:
409:
404:
398:
394:
391:
390:
383:
380:
372:
367:
360:
359:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
332:
331:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
307:
304:
300:
296:
292:
289:
286:
285:
282:
277:
276:
268:
267:
258:
254:
250:
247:
246:
242:
239:
231:
226:
220:
215:
214:
213:
212:
208:
204:
200:
190:
186:
183:
180:
176:
172:
168:
165:
162:
159:
156:
153:
150:
147:
144:
140:
137:
136:Find sources:
132:
128:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
493:
490:
471:
441:
427:
392:
344:
287:
272:
263:
248:
196:
184:
178:
170:
163:
157:
151:
145:
135:
122:
49:
47:
31:
28:
161:free images
499:talk page
37:talk page
501:or in a
429:Relisted
349:Nabinked
311:WP:NSOFT
295:Nabinked
257:WP:NSOFT
120:View log
39:or in a
199:notable
167:WP refs
155:scholar
93:protect
88:history
472:Delete
393:Delete
341:WP:GNG
315:WP:GNG
253:WP:GNG
249:Delete
139:Google
97:delete
76:MixERP
68:MixERP
50:delete
313:? Or
265:Gong
182:JSTOR
143:books
127:Stats
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
480:talk
353:talk
323:talk
299:talk
288:Keep
274:show
207:talk
197:non
175:FENS
149:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
52:. --
319:noq
255:or
203:noq
189:TWL
118:– (
54:BDD
482:)
415:JM
412:N7
378:JM
375:N7
355:)
325:)
301:)
259:.
237:JM
234:N7
221:.
209:)
169:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
478:(
455:i
452:t
449:s
446:u
443:D
407:C
402:T
370:C
365:T
351:(
321:(
297:(
229:C
224:T
205:(
193:)
185:·
179:·
171:·
164:·
158:·
152:·
146:·
141:(
133:(
130:)
123:·
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.