772:"Cox is far less notable than most Catholic bishops and not in the same category – they minister up to millions of people"; "sources do not demonstrate notability. Bishops in major religions ar notable because they head a notable eccesiatcial structure. This article gives little evidence that anyone actually recognizes Cox's eccesiastical authority, and even less that he heads a significant eccesiastical sturcture with multiple parishes and priests under him". Suggestions have been made about articles where he should be mentioned. The ordination of a celebrity in a hotel bedroom (after six weeks of theological studies) should perhaps be mentioned in the article about Lourdes.
652:
The sources do not demonstrate notability. Bishops in major religions ar notable because they head a notable eccesiatcial structure. This article gives little evidence that anyone actually recognizes Cox's eccesiastical authority, and even less that he heads a significant eccesiastical sturcture with
705:
is confusing bureaucracy with notability. Someone can be notable without have a large organizational structure under them. They don't have to have accomplished anything to be notable. But they do need to be of interest to people and have enough written about them. That is the case here. So keep it.
201:
ordination; there is some small activity on him in the Irish papers but I'm tending to the view that this material either presents BLP issues or isn't important. The claims about his affiliation in the article are almost certainly false, and either represent incorrect supposition on the part of
467:-- because he is a controversial figure. I thought that canonical consecration of bishops required it to be performed by three of them. The validity of his consecration and of thus of his episcopal acts may well be questioned, but that is not a matter that WP needs to determine.
196:
There has been some BLP-related discussion of this article concerning claims that Cox performed sham marriages for minors, and this has led to closer examination of the rest of the article. What I'm seeing is that almost nothing about him is verifiable and notable except for the
202:
editors or have no source at all. Ordinarily this would turn into a redirect but the other problem is that he isn't a "Catholic bishop" in the sense that most people would take that, and it's not clear that he even claims to be; he is a textbook example of an
238:
being mentioned years later. His consecration of Bishop Pat
Buckley was also newsworthy in the UK and Ireland. He has received Irish media attention for his 'anti-abortion' ship; and for his stance on Traveller weddings. Sources exist for all of these.
854:- He appears to be good at sometimes getting publicity, but there is zero evidence that he actually is a 'pastor to pastors' - actually a real, working bishop. If we let this guy get an article, every breakaway bishop would have to get one.
165:
381:"We have had cases like this before whereby the children actually believe they are legally married and it has taken a lot of effort to unwrangle everything," according to Father Stephen Monaghan, a Travellers' parish priest.
391:(below) it could be interesting. If the controversies are included. I think I found many of the online sources about him but found only single phrases or single sentences about what he believes – it is mostly controversy. –
230:. There seems to be a supposition that we should have an article, or at least a stub, on every bishop of "mainstream" churches but that the same shouldn't apply to bishops of other denominations or independent bishops.
418:- it is an essay, which "summarizes what some editors believe are the typical outcomes of past AfD discussions for some commonly nominated subjects." The fact remains that Cox is more notable than
159:
372:
609:
493:
440:
everyone has biases including me. Cox is far less notable than most
Catholic bishops and not in the same category – they minister up to millions of people. His controversies
340:
118:
91:
86:
95:
378:
In 2002, Buckley "defended his right to give blessings to teenagers as young as 14, after it was reported he performed a ceremony involving a 15-year-old
Traveller."
589:
78:
629:
514:
I was commenting on an AFD, which is about potential deletion, which I consider inappropriate. BLP issues should be resolved by editing, not by deleting.
926:
He is a crank, possibly a crackpot. But he is a crank who is widely covered in reliable sources. I revised lede to make his self-proclaimed status clear.
125:
492:
thank you for comment. It made me think about changing my vote if more reliably sourced controversial content can be retained. Please look through the
384:
There is a common thread of some kind of ceremonies involving children who are under the impression that they are married when they are in fact not.
833:
While there may be some points about notability that may be true, I don't personally believe this conforms with
Knowledge's notability guidelines.
354:, directly above, mentions Cox once – for ordaining O'Connor. The second article mentions Cox twice – for consecrating Buckley, which points out a
180:
147:
344:
773:
382:
379:
82:
893:
565:
141:
52:
Although the validity of his ministry can be questioned there are multiple adequate sources as to the content of the article. --
969:
952:
935:
918:
899:
863:
844:
825:
800:
781:
760:
734:
715:
692:
662:
641:
621:
601:
546:
523:
509:
476:
453:
428:
400:
339:
children who are under the impression that they are married when they are in fact not legally married (see relevant discussion
300:
274:
245:
221:
60:
17:
137:
810:. Sources provided support the argument that this is a person readers would be interested in looking up in an encyclopedia.
74:
66:
498:"some kind of ceremonies involving children who are under the impression that they are married when they are in fact not"
187:
872:
671:
335:
such a bishop. Cox is known for being the man who ordained Sinead O'Connor and for conducting ceremonies involving
58:
988:
658:
576:
40:
914:
411:
324:
153:
496:
and comment on some of those sources. Doubt about his consecration is only one controversy, another is about
519:
472:
410:
That was the first article I came across. The fact is, there are hundreds of such articles mentioning Cox.
374:
965:
777:
365:
section. Circa 1999, Cox and
Buckley founded, what some news articles call, the "Latin Tridentine Church."
984:
931:
888:
725:
having
Catholic Bishop in the title might be confusing, it is to me. But this person is highly notable.
53:
36:
702:
654:
910:
791:
505:
449:
396:
270:
173:
948:
730:
566:
https://www.churchtimes.co.uk/articles/2014/22-august/features/features/an-angry-voice-and-a-tear
515:
487:
468:
376:
961:
859:
711:
637:
617:
597:
542:
204:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
983:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
943:
He's notable, and there's significant coverage about him, even if it's not for great things.
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
927:
882:
820:
362:
336:
234:
doesn't apply: Cox's ordination of O'Connor has been covered by international media and was
217:
198:
751:
320:
231:
209:
358:, and for ordaining O'Connor. O'Connor has a separate article in which Cox is mentioned.
837:
790:
Please note that the above anon IP has specifically followed me here from a dispute at
683:
501:
445:
392:
289:
266:
944:
745:
726:
855:
707:
633:
613:
593:
538:
112:
909:
He is notable. The only problem is that there is too few content in the article.
369:
366:
811:
795:
755:
435:
423:
415:
388:
351:
295:
256:
240:
213:
794:- they have edited no other article but that and it's talk page, and this AfD.
577:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/personal-view/3623138/Sacred-mysteries.html
422:
Catholic bishops. I think you may be a little biased on this issue, BoBo.
754:
discussion ongoing when someone jumped the gun and AFD'ed the article.
329:"bishops of major denominations are notable by virtue of their status"
361:
I think something about Cox and
Buckley should be included in the
977:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
875:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
674:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
294:, in a Traveller's magazine, now included in the article.
108:
104:
100:
172:
881:
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
680:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
356:"controversy over the validity of his consecration"
610:list of Christianity-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
991:). No further edits should be made to this page.
960:- agree with the above two comments verbatim.
343:); i.e. "the weddings have no legal standing."
186:
8:
628:Note: This debate has been included in the
608:Note: This debate has been included in the
590:list of Ireland-related deletion discussions
588:Note: This debate has been included in the
630:list of People-related deletion discussions
208:. At the moment I would argue that he is a
627:
607:
587:
653:multiple parishes and priests under him.
558:
537:He's notable even if I don't like him.
497:
355:
328:
262:
7:
403:; modified 21:54, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
750:, please note there was already a
24:
371:Traveler practise child marriage.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
263:"stance on Traveller weddings"
1:
212:footnote in he singer's bio.
75:Michael Cox (Catholic bishop)
67:Michael Cox (Catholic bishop)
368:Cox ministers to Travellers.
363:Irish Travellers § Marriage
350:The first article cited by
1008:
970:23:37, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
953:00:47, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
936:00:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
919:09:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
900:07:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
864:19:49, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
663:20:21, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
642:17:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
622:17:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
602:17:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
510:02:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
494:BLP noticeboard discussion
477:18:16, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
454:02:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
429:19:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
401:16:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
301:18:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
275:19:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
246:14:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
222:14:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
61:13:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
845:00:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
826:19:14, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
801:16:07, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
782:15:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
761:22:36, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
735:20:39, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
716:16:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
693:07:56, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
547:16:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
524:16:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
980:Please do not modify it.
261:where do you find Cox's
32:Please do not modify it.
500:as I described above. –
792:2011 Norway attacks
341:on BLP noticeboard
902:
703:John Pack Lambert
695:
691:
655:John Pack Lambert
644:
624:
604:
444:his notability. –
414:is, of course, a
412:WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES
325:WP:CLERGYOUTCOMES
999:
982:
896:
891:
885:
880:
878:
876:
843:
842:
840:
818:
798:
758:
749:
690:
688:
681:
679:
677:
675:
579:
574:
568:
563:
491:
439:
426:
337:Irish Travellers
298:
293:
260:
243:
205:episcopus vagans
191:
190:
176:
128:
116:
98:
55:Anthony Bradbury
34:
1007:
1006:
1002:
1001:
1000:
998:
997:
996:
995:
989:deletion review
978:
911:Daniel Kenneth
903:
894:
889:
883:
871:
869:
838:
836:
834:
812:
796:
756:
743:
696:
684:
682:
670:
668:
584:
583:
582:
575:
571:
564:
560:
485:
433:
424:
296:
287:
254:
241:
199:Sinead O'Connor
133:
124:
89:
73:
70:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1005:
1003:
994:
993:
973:
972:
955:
938:
921:
879:
868:
867:
866:
848:
847:
828:
805:
804:
803:
785:
784:
766:
765:
764:
763:
752:Requested Move
738:
737:
719:
718:
678:
667:
666:
665:
646:
645:
625:
605:
581:
580:
569:
557:
556:
552:
551:
550:
549:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
480:
479:
461:
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
405:
404:
385:
359:
347:
346:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
303:
280:
279:
278:
277:
249:
248:
194:
193:
130:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1004:
992:
990:
986:
981:
975:
974:
971:
967:
963:
959:
956:
954:
950:
946:
942:
939:
937:
933:
929:
925:
922:
920:
916:
912:
908:
905:
904:
901:
897:
892:
886:
877:
874:
865:
861:
857:
853:
850:
849:
846:
841:
832:
829:
827:
824:
823:
819:
817:
816:
809:
806:
802:
799:
793:
789:
788:
787:
786:
783:
779:
775:
771:
768:
767:
762:
759:
753:
747:
742:
741:
740:
739:
736:
732:
728:
724:
721:
720:
717:
713:
709:
704:
701:
698:
697:
694:
689:
687:
676:
673:
664:
660:
656:
651:
648:
647:
643:
639:
635:
631:
626:
623:
619:
615:
611:
606:
603:
599:
595:
591:
586:
585:
578:
573:
570:
567:
562:
559:
555:
548:
544:
540:
536:
533:
532:
525:
521:
517:
516:Peterkingiron
513:
512:
511:
507:
503:
499:
495:
489:
488:Peterkingiron
484:
483:
482:
481:
478:
474:
470:
469:Peterkingiron
466:
463:
462:
455:
451:
447:
443:
437:
432:
431:
430:
427:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:
407:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
383:
380:
377:
375:
373:
370:
367:
364:
360:
357:
353:
349:
348:
345:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
314:
310:
309:
302:
299:
291:
286:
285:
284:
283:
282:
281:
276:
272:
268:
264:
258:
253:
252:
251:
250:
247:
244:
237:
233:
229:
226:
225:
224:
223:
219:
215:
211:
207:
206:
200:
189:
185:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
135:Find sources:
131:
127:
123:
120:
114:
110:
106:
102:
97:
93:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
979:
976:
962:DaltonCastle
957:
940:
923:
906:
870:
851:
830:
821:
814:
813:
807:
774:46.15.246.73
769:
722:
699:
685:
669:
649:
572:
561:
553:
534:
464:
441:
419:
332:
316:
312:
311:
235:
227:
203:
195:
183:
177:
169:
162:
156:
150:
144:
134:
121:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
928:E.M.Gregory
884:Omni Flames
831:Weak Delete
723:Strong Keep
416:red herring
389:User:BD2412
160:free images
686:Sandstein
554:References
985:talk page
839:Music1201
634:• Gene93k
614:• Gene93k
594:• Gene93k
502:BoBoMisiu
446:BoBoMisiu
393:BoBoMisiu
331:, Cox is
317:Undecided
290:BoBoMisiu
267:BoBoMisiu
37:talk page
987:or in a
945:Bruriyah
895:contribs
873:Relisted
746:TeeVeeed
727:TeeVeeed
672:Relisted
327:states:
321:WP:BLP1E
232:WP:BLP1E
210:WP:BLP1E
119:View log
39:or in a
856:Bearian
708:VanEman
539:VanEman
166:WP refs
154:scholar
92:protect
87:history
852:Delete
815:bd2412
797:Bastun
770:Delete
757:Bastun
650:Delete
436:Bastun
425:Bastun
352:Bastun
313:Delete
297:Bastun
257:Bastun
242:Bastun
214:Mangoe
138:Google
96:delete
236:still
181:JSTOR
142:books
126:Stats
113:views
105:watch
101:links
16:<
966:talk
958:Keep
949:talk
941:Keep
932:talk
924:Keep
915:talk
907:Keep
890:talk
860:talk
808:Keep
778:talk
731:talk
712:talk
700:Keep
659:talk
638:talk
618:talk
598:talk
543:talk
535:Keep
520:talk
506:talk
473:talk
465:Keep
450:talk
420:many
397:talk
387:Per
271:talk
228:Keep
218:talk
174:FENS
148:news
109:logs
83:talk
79:edit
50:Keep
442:are
333:not
265:? –
188:TWL
117:– (
968:)
951:)
934:)
917:)
898:)
862:)
835:—
780:)
733:)
714:)
661:)
640:)
632:.
620:)
612:.
600:)
592:.
545:)
522:)
508:)
475:)
452:)
399:)
323:.
319:.
273:)
220:)
168:)
111:|
107:|
103:|
99:|
94:|
90:|
85:|
81:|
964:(
947:(
930:(
913:(
887:(
858:(
822:T
776:(
748::
744:@
729:(
710:(
657:(
636:(
616:(
596:(
541:(
518:(
504:(
490::
486:@
471:(
448:(
438::
434:@
395:(
292::
288:@
269:(
259::
255:@
216:(
192:)
184:·
178:·
170:·
163:·
157:·
151:·
145:·
140:(
132:(
129:)
122:·
115:)
77:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.