321:(Portland 2003) Michael Klein, curator of the Microsoft Collection, “Art for Life” Exhibition Catalogue (Portland 2003) Jeff Jahn, “Something to Prove”, Modern Painters (Spring 2003) Stuart Horodner, curator, “Bid” Exhibition Catalogue (Portland 2003) D.K. Row, “Making a Name, Paying the Rent” The Oregonian (24 Jan 2003) Jeff Jahn, “Potential Hullabaloo in 2003?” nwdrizzle.com (Jan 2003) Richard Speer, “First (Thursday) Impressions” Willamette Week (9 Oct 2002) Jeff Jahn, “History Surprise and Risk” nwdrizzle.com (Jul 2002) Ed. Staff, “Best of Portland” Willamette Week (24 Jul 2002) Karrin Ellertson, “Seeking An Alternative” A&E The Oregonian (7 Jul 2000) Karrin Ellertson, “Clean Art Review” Portland Mercury (Dec 2000) Lisa Lambert, “Art Review: Clean” Willamette Week (Dec 2000)
420:
This article doesn't appear to meet any of the critereon for deletion: It is not "original research" (sources check out), it is not an "inappropriate user page" (not a user page), it is not a "vanity page" (sources check out, wide press coverage - though provincial), it is not "advertising" (nothing
98:
You are welcome to comment but please add your comments to the bottom of the page (not the top) and sign them by adding four tildes (~~~~) which will automatically add your username or IP address and the time and date. Please do not alter the comments or votes of others; this is considered vandalism
304:
Here are a few more articles mentioning Oman - I don't have a complete list, but I'm working on it. The
Portland art scene has really exploded and I'm trying to document the key players. Next will be Jeff Jahn, Jane Beebe, William Jameson (just had a park named after him), Miranda July (whose new
370:
says: "vanity by itself is not a basis for deletion, but lack of importance is". This is a tough one - what establishes importance? For example, I just noticed
Richard Tuttle doesn't even have a page, he's having a retrospective at the SFMOMA right now and is probably one of the most influential
174:
That is correct, the above Keep was written by me, the author of the article. I am working on a history of a particular art movement over the last decade in
Portland, Oregon and the artists who were involved. This article is an artist who was part of this movement. This movement and the artists
150:
If you google just Oman-Reagan you get over 99 hits for this artist. Additionally you will find him mentioned in Modern
Painters magazine and ARTnews magazine. More important is the Field gallery listing. It really is an important institution. I say, keep him and add more information about his
331:
This sort of article is the kind of rare bit of information on a relatively obscure contemporary artist that is SO helpful and one of the reasons I always check wiki when I can't find something elsewhere. If Wiki just had what you can find everywhere it wouldn't be useful. Having said that, the
320:
Richard Speer, “First
Impressions” Willamette Week (12 Nov 2003) D.K. Row, “Shows of Note” The Oregonian (7 Nov 2003) Jeff Jahn, “Core Sample” nwdrizzle.com (Nov 2003) Jeff Jahn, “A Completely Biased History…” nwdrizzle.com (Oct 2003) Jeff Jahn, curator, “The Best Coast” Exhibition Catalogue
421:
for sale or promotion), it is not a "Hoax" (sources check out), it is not "idiosyncratic"(seems to not be structural or behavioral characteristic peculiar to an individual or group.) Although, article does contain source text, perhaps that quoted text should be removed?
27:
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for
Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
183:. The following keep was NOT written by me, but rather by a user who shares the same wireless internet connection as I do, as does an entire building and possibly more. His comment is pointless, nevertheless, it is a keep vote as he is a distinct person.
274:
And here is a recent article describing
Portland's most important collector and her interest in and ::collection of Oman-Reagan's work: Joseph Gallivan, “The Accidental Collector” Portland Tribune (21 Jun ::2005)
110:- articles like Pandeism are kept with a lot less google hits and my understanding the google hits is a guideline instead of official policy. He has a total of 37 relevant google hits, so I vote a week keep.
175:
have been repoted about on CNN, written about in Art Forum, ArtNews, Art in
America, The Oregonian, The Organ, The Portland Tribune and more. It has been discussed by Jerry Salz art critic for the
243:"Do not strike out, remove or modify other people's votes or comments, even if you believe them to be in bad faith, unless they have been banned from editing the relevant pages"
366:
Interesting thing - I realized while editing this that I throw the word vanity around a lot but haven't read the definition for a while. For example - wiki definition of
120:. No entry or appearance in the Grove Art database. No entry in any biographical database I searched. No trace of him shows up in a journal article database.
99:
and grounds for blocking. Please do not comment or vote multiple times pretending you are different people; such comments and votes will be deleted or ignored.
85:
they are in the 6,960,000- 21,200,000 range. Clearly this means...? Nothing? Something? you tell me. Apples and oranges, does that mean apples don't matter?
17:
440:
180:
100:
425:
411:
375:
351:
336:
291:
278:
250:
218:
187:
163:
89:
38:
73:
This is an interesting point you make in your vfd request. Let's look at it from another perspective. If I google
53:- Not notable artist vanity. Less than 50 Google hits, for some perspective I googled other minimalist artists like
439:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an
159:
The preceding keep vote was written by the creator of the article, as was the one that originally followed. --
44:
422:
247:
82:
408:
372:
348:
333:
275:
184:
86:
160:
66:
62:
244:
65:, his gallery, google search of "field gallery" Michael Paul Oman-Reagan returns 8 results.
35:
305:
film "Me, You and
Everyone We Know" is taking the country by storm), Harrel Fletcher, etc..
141:
78:
398:
284:
207:
duplicate vote (actually not a duplicate vote, but using the same internet connection)
394:
288:
215:
176:
131:
121:
111:
367:
58:
397:
started a Tuttle article and I added to it. I hope you'll add to it as well.
54:
179:(he called it intimidating), as well as Larry Rinder, former curator of the
74:
214:
Please provide links or citations to these mentions if possible.
433:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
61:
and they were each in the 40,000-60,000 range. I also nominate
230:- There is no shortage of storage in this world. Enlarge yours
205:- There is no shortage of storage in this world. Enlarge yours
77:
I get 985 results. However if I google other
Musicians like
271:
Jeff Jahn, “Something to Prove” Modern Painters(Spring 2003)
332:
article is in shambles, it needs a re-write desperately.
314:
Daniel Duford, “Core Sampler” The Organ (Nov Dec 2003)
268:
Richard Speer,“City Focus: Portland” ARTnews(Oct 2004)
151:role as the founder of the gallery. July 17 2005
443:). No further edits should be made to this page.
347:I tried editing this a bit. Hope that helped.
8:
371:artists at the moment. Just my few cents.
287:and does mention him, but only in passing.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
103:for more information. Thank you.
181:Whitney Museum of American Art
153:unsigned vote by 66.108.21.54,
1:
31:The result of the debate was
393:point! I found today that
460:
426:03:18, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
412:20:21, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
376:05:41, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
352:05:30, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
337:04:43, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
292:00:24, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
279:00:12, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
251:02:56, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
219:00:00, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
188:20:20, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
164:20:04, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
90:21:52, 18 July 2005 (UTC)
39:05:21, 20 July 2005 (UTC)
436:Please do not modify it.
69:8 July 2005 14:30 (UTC)
45:Michael Paul Oman-Reagan
144:9 July 2005 03:33 (UTC)
134:8 July 2005 23:58 (UTC)
130:nn vanity/promotion. --
124:8 July 2005 19:56 (UTC)
114:8 July 2005 19:39 (UTC)
96:New users please read:
263:Here are the sources:
140:non notable vanity.
441:undeletion request
237:From Guide to VfD
451:
438:
459:
458:
454:
453:
452:
450:
449:
448:
447:
434:
283:The article is
79:Michael Jackson
48:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
457:
455:
446:
445:
429:
428:
423:68.174.126.204
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
399:Richard Tuttle
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
340:
339:
324:
318:
317:
316:
315:
309:
308:
307:
306:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
272:
269:
266:
265:
264:
255:
248:68.174.126.204
241:
240:
239:
238:
232:
231:
224:
223:
222:
221:
209:
208:
197:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
190:
167:
166:
161:TheMidnighters
156:
155:
145:
135:
125:
115:
93:
92:
67:TheMidnighters
47:
42:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
456:
444:
442:
437:
431:
430:
427:
424:
419:
416:
415:
414:
413:
410:
400:
396:
392:
389:
388:
387:
386:
385:
384:
377:
374:
369:
365:
364:
363:
362:
361:
360:
353:
350:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
338:
335:
330:
327:
326:
325:
322:
313:
312:
311:
310:
303:
302:
301:
300:
293:
290:
286:
282:
281:
280:
277:
273:
270:
267:
262:
261:
260:
259:
258:
257:
256:
253:
252:
249:
246:
236:
235:
234:
233:
229:
226:
225:
220:
217:
213:
212:
211:
210:
206:
204:
200:
199:
198:
189:
186:
182:
178:
177:Village Voice
173:
172:
171:
170:
169:
168:
165:
162:
158:
157:
154:
149:
146:
143:
139:
136:
133:
129:
126:
123:
119:
116:
113:
109:
106:
105:
104:
102:
97:
91:
88:
84:
80:
76:
72:
71:
70:
68:
64:
63:Field Gallery
60:
56:
52:
46:
43:
41:
40:
37:
34:
33:no consensus.
29:
19:
435:
432:
417:
409:66.108.21.54
407:
390:
373:151.202.8.52
349:151.202.8.52
334:151.202.8.52
328:
323:
319:
276:66.108.21.54
254:
242:
227:
202:
201:
196:
185:66.108.21.54
152:
147:
137:
127:
117:
107:
95:
94:
87:66.108.21.54
50:
49:
32:
30:
26:
368:vanity page
329:Strong Keep
59:Donald Judd
36:Woohookitty
142:JamesBurns
55:Sol LeWitt
108:Weak Keep
101:Read this
75:Bill Doss
395:Gamaliel
289:Gamaliel
216:Gamaliel
132:Etacar11
122:Gamaliel
245:WP:GVFD
112:Falphin
83:Madonna
138:Delete
128:Delete
118:Delete
51:Delete
391:GREAT
16:<
418:Keep
285:here
228:Keep
203:Keep
148:Keep
81:and
57:and
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.