531:. I would be happier there were more secondary sources other than MathWorld cited though. I do have an issue with the lack of biographical material in the article however. No date and place of birth, nothing about where he got his degree, etc. To me, notable subject or not, you should at least have some basic facts before creating an article, otherwise you might as well just put the name on the requested articles list. But presumably that info can be found and added to the article so it's a fixable issue and shouldn't be deleted for that reason.--
404:. I was in the same quandary as Agricola44 regarding this. The subject has a grand total of 18 citations on HPoP, with an h-index of 2. Yet, the term “Somos sequence” has 329 citations and an h-index of 11, also on HPoP. And I wouldn’t be surprised if different searches for ideas by the subject would uncover many more hits. In other words, the idea (or ideas) lives on and is cited, but not with reference to its originator or the original article. I guess some great mathematicians who have WP articles (e.g.,
527:: I'm not sure that getting something named for him should be the criterion; not everything gets named after someone who actually had anything to do with inventing it. But if the person did invent something which is mentioned in a secondary source it seems to me that that would qualify as "significant impact" to satisfy
382:. We should tread carefully here, as this seems to be a rather unusual case. Article and supporting info suggest he's not a professional mathematician. Nevertheless, there appear to be at least 2 significant results named after him. This certainly does imply
552:? Should we count that as another "keep" vote? It appears to be Zeilberger's only Knowledge edit, and somewhat competently done. He may be a total newbie among Wikipedians, but he is a respected mathematician.
158:
242:
408:, admittedly from another era) have low citations and h-indexes, but when one looks at citations to their ideas, they are much, much higher. Bottom line: I think the subject meets
386:
amount of notability, but I don't feel knowledgeable enough about these areas at the moment to render an opinion on whether it is sufficient for our purposes. Respectfully,
591:
He is notable enough to have something like that named after him. Inventing a major mathematical equation is notable work. There are 82 results in Google scholar search
119:
152:
427:
362:
341:
365:
to the article. I remember Somos speaking at the MIT combinatorics seminar. But probably that in itself is not evidence of "notability".
92:
87:
96:
17:
79:
173:
140:
49:
649:
36:
648:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
344:. Or (I don't feel inclined at the moment to get my head around this) are these two aspects of the same thing?
301:
283:
253:
134:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
625:
per DreamFocus. One of the references has been added , and there is plenty of scope for the article to grow.
412:
criterion #1 (significant impact in scholarly discipline, broadly construed), although in an unorthodox way.--
557:
515:
439:
370:
634:
630:
617:
579:
575:
561:
540:
519:
501:
477:
463:
443:
421:
395:
374:
353:
349:
327:
305:
287:
257:
231:
130:
61:
473:
417:
57:
189:
Disputed PROD, removed with comment '(remove prod. Noted by
Mathworld. Should be AfDd.)'. I can't find
497:
391:
323:
296:. It's pretty bare-bones so far but at least contains some of the basic facts and a few references. —
274:) even though Somos himself seems hard to find sufficient sourcing about. This seems to be a case of
180:
297:
279:
249:
166:
553:
511:
435:
366:
83:
592:
626:
571:
405:
345:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
595:
549:
536:
469:
459:
413:
53:
271:
146:
493:
387:
319:
275:
548:
Has anyone verified that the original creator of this article is in fact, as it appears,
48:. No consensus to delete. The issue of merging can continue on the article's talk page. (
528:
431:
409:
337:
293:
267:
224:
212:
208:
204:
75:
67:
195:
113:
532:
455:
217:
510:, since things named after him seem to get attention from his colleagues.
570:
I've sent Prof. Zeilberger an email asking if he'd like to comment here.
448:
Another post on the academic delsort page clears up the mystery of HPoP:
340:
would be appropriate, because Somos also appears to be notable for
452:
434:
nor Google is shedding any light. Could you disabbreviate this?
642:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
266:
into an (as-yet-nonexistent, but easily stubbed out) article on
430:, and something tells me that's not what you mean, and neither
243:
list of
Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
449:
109:
105:
101:
165:
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
652:). No further edits should be made to this page.
270:, which are a notable topic in mathematics (see
179:
8:
237:
428:Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix
241:: This debate has been included in the
7:
488:In view of developments I change to
363:Somos' quadratic recurrence constant
342:Somos' quadratic recurrence constant
292:I have since started an article on
336:. I'm not sure that a redirect to
24:
203:of the subject, so seems to fail
594:and some of that looks notable.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
272:Google scholar search results
635:18:29, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
618:17:03, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
580:21:16, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
562:19:57, 12 October 2009 (UTC)
541:16:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)
520:19:45, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
62:00:28, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
502:22:57, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
478:13:35, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
464:05:36, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
444:04:43, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
422:01:22, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
396:16:25, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
375:05:06, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
354:22:27, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
328:22:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
306:23:29, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
288:22:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
258:21:54, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
232:21:42, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
669:
278:and redirects are cheap. —
645:Please do not modify it.
316:sounds like a good idea.
32:Please do not modify it.
426:"HPoP" redirects to
318:I removed the prod.
314:Merge and redirect
264:Merge and redirect
44:The result was
406:Niels Henrik Abel
260:
246:
230:
50:non-admin closure
660:
647:
614:
611:
608:
605:
602:
599:
550:Doron Zeilberger
468:Thanks John Z.--
247:
229:
227:
221:
215:
196:reliable sources
184:
183:
169:
117:
99:
34:
668:
667:
663:
662:
661:
659:
658:
657:
656:
650:deletion review
643:
612:
609:
606:
603:
600:
597:
294:Somos sequences
268:Somos sequences
225:
219:
216:
126:
90:
74:
71:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
666:
664:
655:
654:
638:
637:
620:
585:
584:
583:
582:
565:
564:
543:
522:
505:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
481:
480:
399:
377:
356:
338:Somos sequence
331:
310:
309:
308:
298:David Eppstein
280:David Eppstein
261:
250:David Eppstein
187:
186:
123:
70:
65:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
665:
653:
651:
646:
640:
639:
636:
632:
628:
624:
621:
619:
616:
615:
593:
590:
587:
586:
581:
577:
573:
569:
568:
567:
566:
563:
559:
555:
554:Michael Hardy
551:
547:
544:
542:
538:
534:
530:
526:
523:
521:
517:
513:
512:Michael Hardy
509:
506:
503:
499:
495:
491:
487:
479:
475:
471:
467:
466:
465:
461:
457:
453:
450:
447:
446:
445:
441:
437:
436:Michael Hardy
433:
429:
425:
424:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
400:
397:
393:
389:
385:
381:
378:
376:
372:
368:
367:Michael Hardy
364:
360:
357:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
335:
332:
329:
325:
321:
317:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
290:
289:
285:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
262:
259:
255:
251:
244:
240:
236:
235:
234:
233:
228:
223:
222:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
197:
192:
182:
178:
175:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
145:
142:
139:
136:
132:
129:
128:Find sources:
124:
121:
115:
111:
107:
103:
98:
94:
89:
85:
81:
77:
76:Michael Somos
73:
72:
69:
68:Michael Somos
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
644:
641:
627:FeydHuxtable
622:
596:
588:
572:Phil Bridger
545:
524:
507:
489:
401:
383:
379:
358:
346:Phil Bridger
333:
313:
312:
263:
238:
218:
200:
194:
193:coverage in
190:
188:
176:
170:
162:
155:
149:
143:
137:
127:
45:
43:
31:
28:
470:Eric Yurken
414:Eric Yurken
361:I've added
201:independent
191:significant
153:free images
54:Ron Ritzman
494:Xxanthippe
388:Agricola44
320:Xxanthippe
525:Weak Keep
199:that are
546:Comment:
359:Comment:
276:WP:BIO1E
120:View log
529:WP:PROF
432:WP:PROF
410:WP:PROF
380:Comment
334:Comment
213:WP:PROF
159:WPÂ refs
147:scholar
93:protect
88:history
533:RDBury
456:John Z
209:WP:BIO
207:, and
205:WP:GNG
131:Google
97:delete
613:Focus
220:Chzz
174:JSTOR
135:books
114:views
106:watch
102:links
16:<
631:talk
623:Keep
589:Keep
576:talk
558:talk
537:talk
516:talk
508:Keep
498:talk
490:Keep
474:talk
460:talk
451:See
440:talk
418:talk
402:Keep
392:talk
384:some
371:talk
350:talk
324:talk
302:talk
284:talk
254:talk
239:Note
167:FENS
141:news
110:logs
84:talk
80:edit
58:talk
46:keep
181:TWL
118:– (
633:)
578:)
560:)
539:)
518:)
500:)
492:.
476:)
462:)
442:)
420:)
394:)
373:)
352:)
326:)
304:)
286:)
256:)
245:.
226:â–ş
211:,
161:)
112:|
108:|
104:|
100:|
95:|
91:|
86:|
82:|
60:)
52:)
629:(
610:m
607:a
604:e
601:r
598:D
574:(
556:(
535:(
514:(
504:.
496:(
472:(
458:(
454:.
438:(
416:(
398:.
390:(
369:(
348:(
330:.
322:(
300:(
282:(
252:(
248:—
185:)
177:·
171:·
163:·
156:·
150:·
144:·
138:·
133:(
125:(
122:)
116:)
78:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.