Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Mims-Pianka controversy - Knowledge (XXG)

Source ๐Ÿ“

179:
The article as currently written has 16 sources. Now some of those used are blogs, but by my estimate 12 of the sources are reliable sources. Furthermore, even before we get to the irrelevancy of google hit numbers there are many google hits not covered by the above google search. For example,
237:" by the nom is flat wrong. Furthermore, his search engine test for notability is poorly formed for both search terms and operators and so gives a misleadingly low number of hits. A properly formed search engine test would be 229:
tells us "A topic is presumed to be notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject." Articles in the mainstream media are secondary sources, and these 18
110: 156:
Notable and interesting. Google hits, although an interesting method of determining interest, are not the only thing that matters. Well, Joshua makes a good argument too!
83: 78: 87: 70: 188:
turns up even more sources. And a search of google news shows many additional reliable sources even beyond those used in the article,
17: 189: 231: 74: 338: 323: 302: 286: 272: 250: 218: 201: 171: 148: 130: 52: 36: 337:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
185: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
246: 66: 58: 126: 181: 118: 281: 214: 144: 321: 242: 197: 157: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
238: 122: 298: 210: 140: 233:
show it is a notable enough topic to warrant an article and it characterization as a "
226: 311: 266: 193: 49: 280:
Notable; was notable, will remain notable. Notability does not degrade over time.
104: 294: 184:
turns up many additional sources (many overlapping), and simply googling for
260: 241:
which returns 9100 + hits, rather that his "Mims-Pianka+controversy".
331:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
258:
Non-trivial coverage in a number of reliable secondary sources.
117:
non-notable tempest in the creation/evolution blogosphere, only
235:
non-notable tempest in the creation/evolution blogosphere
100: 96: 92: 139:
Can be covered (and is) in the main subjects article.
192:which include Fox News, the Boston Globe, and CBS. 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 310:Reasonably well-sourced. I would call it notable. 341:). No further edits should be made to this page. 8: 227:Knowledge (XXG)'s notability guideline 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 1: 53:03:57, 11 December 2007 (UTC) 324:01:00, 8 December 2007 (UTC) 303:23:24, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 287:16:12, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 273:14:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 251:03:29, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 219:02:07, 7 December 2007 (UTC) 202:22:57, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 172:22:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 149:22:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 131:21:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC) 182:googling without the hyphen 358: 334:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 67:Mims-Pianka controversy 59:Mims-Pianka controversy 271: 170: 349: 336: 318: 284: 269: 263: 259: 169: 167: 162: 121:hits at google. 108: 90: 34: 357: 356: 352: 351: 350: 348: 347: 346: 345: 339:deletion review 332: 312: 282: 267: 261: 209:, per Joshua. 163: 158: 81: 65: 62: 44:The result was 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 355: 353: 344: 343: 327: 326: 305: 289: 283:Lawrence Cohen 275: 253: 221: 204: 174: 151: 115: 114: 61: 56: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 354: 342: 340: 335: 329: 328: 325: 322: 319: 317: 316: 309: 306: 304: 300: 296: 293: 290: 288: 285: 279: 276: 274: 270: 264: 257: 254: 252: 248: 244: 243:FeloniousMonk 240: 239:Mims + Pianka 236: 232: 228: 225: 222: 220: 216: 212: 208: 205: 203: 199: 195: 191: 187: 183: 178: 175: 173: 168: 166: 161: 155: 152: 150: 146: 142: 138: 135: 134: 133: 132: 128: 124: 120: 112: 106: 102: 98: 94: 89: 85: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 63: 60: 57: 55: 54: 51: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 333: 330: 314: 313: 307: 291: 277: 255: 234: 223: 206: 190:as seen here 176: 164: 159: 153: 136: 116: 45: 43: 31: 28: 186:Mims+Pianka 123:CruftCutter 211:Guettarda 141:Gtstricky 315:Tim Ross 111:View log 194:JoshuaZ 84:protect 79:history 50:John254 262:spryde 165:Marlin 160:Orange 137:Delete 88:delete 295:Filll 105:views 97:watch 93:links 16:< 308:Keep 299:talk 292:Keep 278:Keep 268:talk 256:Keep 247:talk 224:Keep 215:talk 207:Keep 198:talk 177:keep 154:Keep 145:talk 127:talk 101:logs 75:talk 71:edit 46:keep 119:329 109:โ€“ ( 301:) 265:| 249:) 217:) 200:) 147:) 129:) 103:| 99:| 95:| 91:| 86:| 82:| 77:| 73:| 48:. 320:ยท 297:( 245:( 213:( 196:( 143:( 125:( 113:) 107:) 69:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
John254
03:57, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
Mims-Pianka controversy
Mims-Pianka controversy
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
329
CruftCutter
talk
21:34, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
Gtstricky
talk
22:05, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
OrangeMarlin
22:41, 6 December 2007 (UTC)
googling without the hyphen
Mims+Pianka
as seen here
JoshuaZ
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

โ†‘